topic six - organisations, movements and members Flashcards
what are sociologists interested in
the type of religious organisations, how theydevelop and who joins them
who initially distringuished two types or organisations and what were they
Troeltsch:
- chruch
- sect
define church
TROELSTCH: large organisations such as the Catholic Church run by a bureaucratic hierarchy of professional priests
- claim a monopoly of truth and are universalitstic so aim to include the whole of soc
- yet, they attract higher classes because they are ideologically conservative
- place few demands on their members
define sect
TROLESCH: small, exlusive groups with a charismatic leader instead of a hierarchy who are hostile towards the rest of society’s differing beliefs especially
- mainly attract the poor and oppressed
- claim a monopoly of truth as well
- have expectations and demands of their members so expect a high level of commitment
who has identified another type and what is it
Niebuhr:
denominations are a more moderate religious group than a sect as membership is less exclusive than a sect but are relatively bureaucratic and organised
- accepts the legitimacy of society’s values
- impose minor restrictions such as forbidding alcohol
- do not claim a monopoly of truth
Examples: Methodists, Baptists
fourth type of religious organisation
cult:
- highly individualistic and least organised
- made of a few loosely-knit members who share some beliefs
- often led by practitioners or therapists who claim special knowledge to improve life in this world so are world-affirming
- do not have high expectations of members
- ideas and belief systems are not fully developed yet
similarities amd differences:
Wallis:
- churches and sects claim a monopoly of truth
- chuches and denominations are seen as respectable whereas sects and cults are seena s deviant
how is Troelstch criticised
- his descriptions of religious movements do not fit today’s reality for example churches being large organisations only applies to the Catholic Church before the 16th centry as it’s religious monopoly was undermined by the Protestant Reformation
due to what changes how can religious movements be categorised in today’s society
religious diversity becoming the norm in society has led to many new religions and organisations such as Transcendental meditation or Krishna Consciousness
- this has led Wallis to catergorise them into the following:
- World-rejecting NRMs
- World-accommodating NRMs
- World-affirming NRMs
World rejecting NRMs
- distinct religious organisations with a clear notion of God
- highly critical of wider society’s views and seek to bring about radical change
- members believe that in order to attain salvation they must detach fully from their former lives
- there is restricted contact from the wider world as members live communally
e.g. the Branch Davidian
World accomodating NRMs
- often split from mainstream denominations or churches as they believe these are no longer upholding the spiritual purity of religion and so seek to restore this
- they are not accepting nor rejecting of worldly matters and members lead conventional lives
e.g. neo-Pentecostalists
World-affirming NRMs
- not highly organised organisations but offer members spiritual reasoning and powers
- accepting of the world as it is and have an optimistic outlook: enables them to promise followers this-wordly success
- not critical of other views but claim to offer special knowledge to overcome suffering such as unhappiness or illness
which was the most successful of Wallis’ categories
World affirming NRMs such as Scientology with about 165,000 members in the UK as of 2005
How does Wallis criticise themselves
- not all movements can clearly fit into a specific typology and instead could have elements of more than one
- e.g. the 3HO movement
- however, even if general, sociologists find typologies useful as a way of analysing and comparing significant features of NRMs
Who else criticises Wallis
Stark and Bainbridge as the argue religious organisations should be distinguished in terms of the level of conflict between the group and wider society and therefore identify two types:
sects and cults
Stark and Bainbridge’s sect
result from schisms (conflicts in existing organisations) and usually break away from churches due to disagreements about doctrine
- promise other-wordly benefits to those suffering economic deprivation such as salvation/rewards in heaven
Stark and Bainbridge’s cult
new religions such as Scientology
- offer this wordly benefits to more weather prosperous individuals who suffer from psychic deprivation (anomie) or organismic deprivation (health concerns)
how have Stark and Bainbridge further categorised cults
- audience cults
- client cults
- cultic movements
audience cults
S AND B:
- least organised and do not involve formal membership or intense commitment as there is little interaction between members so participantion can be through the media
e.g. astrology
client cults
based on the relationship between the client and a consultant
- in the past they claimed to be practioners of medical miracles or had the ability to contact the dead
- in today’s society, they come across as therapists who promise personal fulfillment/self- discovery
cultic movements
- most organised and demand a higher level of commitment
- requires strict membership (cannot belong to other movements)
- aims to meet members’ needs
e.g. Doomsday cults which predict the end of the world and commit mass suicide