Topic 9: Meta Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

What is Meta Analysis

A

The statistical combination of results from two or more separate studies. A systematic review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why might we want to do meta analysis

A

Individual studies may be too small, studies may address the same question but the trials differ in some ways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why might individual trials be too small

A

Failed to recruit their target, they overestimated the MCID.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In what ways can trials that address the same research question differ

A

Details of treatment, outcome, patient samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is meta-analysis needed in grant applications

A

To demonstrate a new trial is justified, and the question cannot be answered using existing data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What might make a trial difficult to include in meta analysis

A

Difficult to locate, trial might not have made it into literature, the trial is currently ongoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the advantages of meta analysis

A

Increase the power to detect treatment differences, increased precision for estimates of treatment effect. Allows results from small inconclusive studies to contribute. Gain the ability to answer questions not posed by individual studies (eg subgroup effects). It is reassuring to see consistency across a broad range of patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do we need to consider for meta analysis to make sure it isn’t misleading

A

Specific study designs, within study biases, variation across studies, reporting bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the preliminary steps for a meta analysis

A

Formulate review question, specify eligibility criteria, identify, select and criticially appraise studies, collect appropriate data, decide what would be meaningful to analyse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does an assessment of quality of the study mainly look at

A

The risk of bias in the results: for example, over or under estimating a treatment effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an example of a tool for assessing bias

A

Cochranes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give reasons a trial may not be considered of high enough quality to be included in a meta analysis

A

Small sample size, poor measurement of characteristics, poor intervention implications, non-random treatment assignment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do we decide which studies to exclude

A

A study is given a quality score, and we exclude studies based on a quality score cut off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are 2 other ways to assess the quality of trials being considered for the meta analysis

A

Weighting studies, down weighting those of a poorer quality. Or doing a sensitivity analysis where we compare results across pre-specified analyses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What quantity do we usually investigate when it is binary data

A

Risk ratio, odds ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What quantity do we usually investigate when it is continuous data

A

Mean difference, standardised mean difference

17
Q

What quantity do we usually investigate when it is ordinal data

A

Proportional odds ratio

18
Q

What quantity do we usually investigate when it is counts and rates data

A

rate ratio

19
Q

What quantity do we usually investigate when it is time to event data

A

Hazard ratio

20
Q

What analysis method is used for meta analysis

A

Meta regression analysis

21
Q

How does the fixed effects model work

A

The underlying true treatment effect is assumed to be equal for all trials, and then the treatment effect observed in each trial is this plus a sampling error.

22
Q

What distribution does the fixed effects model assume for the sampling errors

A

normally distributed with mean 0 and variance.

23
Q

What is an alternative to the fixed effects model

A

The random effects model

24
Q

What does the random effects model say

A

allows the population treatment effects to vary across trials, since the idea that each observed treatment effect estimates that same underlying quality is not necessarily plausible.

25
Q

What does meta regression analysis do

A

Models the variation between trials investigating why results from different trials might have differred.

26
Q

What is heterogeneity in meta analysis

A

The variation in study outcomes between studies

27
Q

What is I-squared

A

The percentage of total variation across studies due to heterogeneity and not chance.

28
Q

What can we do before deciding whether to carry out a fixed or random effects model

A

Test for homogeneity

29
Q

What is I-squared used as an alternative for and why

A

Homogeneity tests. Homogeneity tests have low power.