Topic 6: Monetarism Flashcards
State Milton Friedman’s quantity theory of money.
Where:
r… = interest rates on money, bonds and equities.
Thing with the derivative is the expected inflation rate. (Also cost of holding assets).
wt = share of wealth in non-human form.
ug = Liquidity preference & other tastes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98829/98829a20f3f7c53eeb94218e3cc0b548e85186fc" alt=""
How can milton friedman’s equation be restated for real money and M/P?
M/P = Remove Yt/Pt.
M/Y = Make Use Pt/Yt instead of Yt/Pt.
Show how an expansion in the money supply works through in the monetarist perspective in an ISLM model with nominal interest rates.
- Initial response is an increase of the LM curve to LM1
- Money demand then begins to adjust so it will return to LM0.
- But the IS curve will expand, to incorporate inflationary expectations.
- As a result, the LM curve must fall even further to LM2, leaving the economy with a higher nominal interest rate. (Due to higher expected inflation.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6221/e6221cb2325ae80af02b418e8538a120f96db33b" alt=""
What is the philips curve?
- The suposed relationship between inflation and unemployment, which forms a convex curve.
- Observed during the 1950’s and 60’s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4367/d4367ca2e0b0b096bdfe4d377da6d1a5200de2f0" alt=""
What happened to the Philips curve in the 70’s and 80’s?
It disappeared.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/833b6/833b62d70a57d896c95a7d8cc8cd7a765995dd49" alt=""
How can the supposed disapearence of the philips curve be explained?
(From the 60’s to the 80’s.)
There is a long run level of unemployment, that the short run philips curve shifts around.
In a dynamic model with constand money growth, consider the effects of an increase in the rate of that growth, from 5% to 10%, where the economy grows at 2% in real terms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cfd1/4cfd18667e02b03e71b85dbfa5c058c87bb8ef26" alt=""
What is superneutrality?
- A static equilibrium point that is invariant to the quantity of money.
- In the absence of money growth, inflation can be zero.
- But once transitions work thourgh, legacy of monetary growth form an inflationary equilibrium -> inflation becomes self generating.
Why did the german economy undergo hyperinflation?
- Bresciani-Turroni say that it was budget deficits.
- Joan Robinson says that when faced with starvation, wage rises were guarentied.
- Conclusion: Quantity of money was the start of the problem, but it was perpetuated by wage pressure.
What are the three sources of hyperinflation?
- Depreciation of the f.c. value of the currency.
- Upward adjustment of wages.
- Budget deficits.
What are Philip Cagans puzzles?
- During period of rapid inflation, price levels rise faster then money balances so real money balances fall.
- There is a shortage of money even though printing presses run non stop.
- If inflation is the result of monetary creation, why create money in the first place?
Summarise Cagan’s model.
Addresses his ‘puzzles’ by stating:
- The expected change in demand for real cash balances is the negative of the expected rate of change in the price level.
- i.e. The elasticity of real demand for money is proportional to the expected rate of change in prices.
- Key point: what causes the expected rate of change in prices.
Formalize Cagan’s Model
Et = βCt-1 + (1-β)Et-1
Where E = Expected price change.
C = Actual price change.
So by substitution:
Et = βCt-1 + β(1-β)Et- + β(1-β)2Ct-3
i.e. People form their expectations with a weighting on the most recent periods.
How does Cagan’s model compare to Milton’s?
Cagan emphasises Friedman’s point that the cost of holding money is given by an expectation, by estimating:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a52d/0a52d01846dde83f8b424381f6070e8517073553" alt=""
Descriptively, how does Cagan see expected inflation?
- Expected inflation is not a force that acts on velocity.
- It is determined by past inflation.
- And so determined by past injections of money.
How do monetists see the printing of money by governments?
- A convienient method of taxation.
- Inflation increases the cost of hodling money, it has the same effect as a tax.
- Except the inflation can become self-perpetuating… oops.