Topic 3: Classical Economics and Walras Flashcards
What is the classical view and dichotomy?
That real economic analysis can be seperated from monetary matters - the classical dichotomy is the idea that money is a veil.
What are the forms of Walra’s model we consider?
In Walras’s model, how is demand determined?
A function of the relative price of all goods, and inital endowement of goods.
What is Say’s law?
Supply creates it’s own demand
What is Walras’s law?
The sum of the numeraire value of demands and the sum of the numeraire value of supply are the equal. This tends to render the last equation of any set of excess demand functions unnecessary.
How can we formalise Walras’s model?
Have n-1 goods.
Demand is a function of relative prices plus endowment.
Excess demandi = f(1,p2/p1 … pn-1/p1, Σpi/p1Si) - Si
All Si are known.
We have n-1 equations, p1 is the numeraire, so we only have n-2 unknowns.
Walras’s law means ΣPiDi = ΣpiSi
So the n-1’th equation can be derived from the others, and there are only n-2 equations indepedent.
What is Say’s identity?
When we look at a non-monetary system, Say’s law becomes a mathematical identity.
What does Walras’s law imply?
That there can be no excess demand or supply across the entire market. Individual products might have excess demand, but there will be excess supply elsewhere that ‘cancells’ it out. The entire market can’t be in excess supply or excess demand in the walras model (without money).
What is the fisher equation?
Fishers exchange circulation equation
MV = PLT
M = Money
V = Velocity of money
T = index of real transactions (real expenditure)
PL = nominal index of the price leves (CPI)
Fisher stresses that PL Derives from M, V and T. Investigates circumstances where V is relatively constant.
What is the classical quantity theory?
MV = Py
What is the cash balances equation?
Also known as the cambridge equation, written up by Pigou in 1917
PR = kY/M
where PR = 1/PL
What was Pareto’s critique of Pigou’s paper?
Written in 1920.
Pareto’s criticism is there is a need to add economic growth and monetary growth, and conduct real analysis.
Determined that growth would have to be zero.
What is the transmition mechanism for changes in the money stock to affect prices?
Direct mechanism:
i) Direct (ΔM -> ΔP)
ii) Indirect (ΔM -> Δi -> ΔLoanable funds -> ΔP)
Show the graph for the direct mechanism. Explain it briefly.
Equates money demand and money supply per the cambridge equation. As the supply of money is fixed, demand adjusts so that the economy remains on it’s locus of monetary equilibria line.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83f28/83f2810f0c8e06a409630e9e00d95dfc447c51cb" alt=""
Show the graph for the indirect mechanism. Briefly explain it.
This looks at the flow of investment by examining the creation / excess of money, loanable funds and bonds.
- ~BS = ~I + ΔMD
- ~BD = ~S + ΔMS
- ~I + ΔMD = ~S + ΔMS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09cc1/09cc12f8e891e39b86e691bac64798001f67f579" alt=""
Show an expansion of the money supply in the indirect money mechanism model.
- The change in the money supply causes a lower interest rate.
- This increases the demand for bonds. Hence there is an excess of investment. In the long run, this will increase demand for money, returning the system back to the level determined by the demand for invesment and savings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/181a6/181a6f763547f15b8997cf2d41460afb90b0be15" alt=""
How do we add money to the walras system?
ED1 = f(p1/pn, p2/pn, p3/pn, … pn-1/pn, Σpi/pnSi) - S1
CPI is defined as pn = Σwipi
n unknown variabels comprising n-1 relative prices and 1 price level variable
n-2 independent ED equations
1 equation for defining the price level
1 equation for the quantity level
What are the implications of adding in money to the walras model?
The sum of real demand for goods and demand for money is equal to the sum of real supply of goods and supply of money.
There can be an excess supply of goods, and excess demand of money.
Says equality, not Says identity.
What is Patinkin’s inconsistancy in the classical dichotomy?
When money is added, was variation in the absolute price level allowed to alter excess demand? Nope. Each price in the system is divided by pn so there are no relative price changes.
It is relative price changes that influence excess demand.
What is patinkins solution to the classical dichotomy?
Model money as a good which can be stockpiled. An increase in real cash balances can increase demand for goods, as there is an excess supply of money.
Show Patnkin’s equation for excess demand
ED with real balances.
Where Si/pn represents the real money supply.
Money is no longer a veil.
Say’s identity is ruled out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/458e0/458e0ae338a6967189824a5ae873685c274ba602" alt=""
Show the patinkin’s graph for real balances and goods
Patinkin’s model assumes real balances have utility
But prices will eventually increase, pulling the budget constraint back, as in the quantity theory, as argued by archibald and lipsey. This means the classical dichotomy holds in the long run. Patinkin argues this doesn’t even wash out in the long run.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/052e8/052e84a1ee06abbbd69efc69b35c797db6f817aa" alt=""
Constrast the excess demand equations for different versions of Walras’s models.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7582a/7582a57c9041fa233a20a7bfa5e711543da5da72" alt=""