Topic 5: Relationship between media and audiences Flashcards
A media text
any media product which describes, defines or represents something such as Tv/ radio etc
Polysemic
a media text (message/ headline/ picture) can be interpreted in different ways by different people
Methodological problems of researching media effects
if it is shown that those who watch more violence on television are more aggressive than those who watch less, this might be because people whose social circumstances have made them more aggressive, choose to watch more violent programmes
Media effects models
How passive or active are the audiences?
passive: do they ‘mindlessly’ consume media texts and accept everything thrown at them
active: interpret and criticize media texts - giving them different meanings and interpretations
Media effects models
Hoe powerful are the media in affecting audiences?
How influential are the media, if at all, compared to other influences on audience behaviour, such as their own
experiences
1.The hypodermic syringe model
- Suggests that media directly injects messages into passive audiences, who accept and act on them without resistance
- media influences behaviour by spreading dominant ideologies, leading audiences to imitate what they see
The hypodermic syringe model
Dworkin 1981
Argued that pornography leads to the abuse of women. The model was also used to explain the role of social media in fuelling the 2011 Tottenham/London riots.
The hypodermic syringe model
A03
- The model assumes the entire audience is passive and homogeneous (sharing the same characteristics) and will react in the same way to media content.
- It assumes audiences are passive, gullible and easily manipulated
3 It assumes the media have enormous power and influence- overriding all other agencies of socialization and people’s own experiences.
- The two-step flow model
Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955).
That the media still have quite strong effects on audiences, but they do not simply passively and directly react to media content, and will respond in a variety of ways to it.
Opinion leaders
Audience responses are influenced by opinion leaders within their social networks, such as family, friends, colleagues, or peers.
These respected individuals interpret media messages, form opinions, and influence discussions within their groups.
The two-step flow model (Steps)
1st: opinion leaders select, interpret and filter media texts before they reach mass audiences, and form their own opinions and interpretations of them
2nd: Opinion leaders then selectively pass on these messages, which contain their own opinions and interpretations, to others in their social groups
Two step flow model A03
- There are probably more than two steps in the media’s influence.
- It still rests on the basic assumption that the influence of the media flows from the media to the audience-
- It suggests that people are very vulnerable to influence and manipulation by opinion leaders.
- It suggests the audience is divided into ‘active’ viewers/readers (the ‘opinion leaders’) and passive’ viewers/ readers who are influenced by the opinion leaders.
- With the rise of the new media and social networking sites, the role of opinion leaders may be less influential,
- The cultural effects model - the ‘drip drip’ effect
Neo-Marxist cultural effects theory argues that media content is influenced by powerful groups in society and generally reflects the dominant ideology. However, audiences are not passive; they interpret media messages based on factors like social class, gender, ethnicity, and personal experiences. While most people accept media narratives, some may question or reject them
Encoding/Decoding and reception analysis
The analysis of how audiences receive and interpret media texts, and therefore
what effects they have on audiences, is known as reception analysis.
Encoding/Decoding and reception analysis
Hall (1980)
neo-Marxist perspective, suggests media texts - the content of media messages such as television news and current affairs programmes - are ‘encoded’ by those who produce them,
most audiences will receive and interpret - or decode - media texts containing this dominant
hegemony viewpoint in the way they were intended or encoded,
Morley (1999 (1980),
how audiences responded to or decoded media texts in the popular Nationwide BBC1 news programme 1969-1983
1) A preferred (or dominant) reading
2) A negotiated reading
3) An oppositional reading
Selective filtering - an Interpretivist approach
Klapper (1960) suggested, like Hall and Morley, that people have
experiences of their own, make choices, and interpret, or decode, and filter what they read, see or hear in
the media. Klapper suggests there are three filters that people apply in their approaches to and interpretations of the media:
Selective filtering - an Interpretivist approach (3 filters)
1 Selective exposure. This filter means people must first choose what they wish to watch, read or listen to in the media, and they may choose only media messages that fit in with their existing views and interests.
- Selective perception. This filter means people will react differently to the same message,
- Selective retention. This filter means people will forget material that is not in line with their views and interests,
The Glasgow Media Group
Philo (2008) of the GMG criticizes the idea that media texts are completely open to audience interpretation. While he acknowledges that audiences can be active and sometimes critical, he argues that media holds significant power in shaping public perceptions
Philo (1990) British miners’ strike study (1984/5)
Found that most people, regardless of class or politics, accepted the media’s portrayal of miners as responsible for the violence. Even those sympathetic to the miners were influenced by the dominant media narrative. The only exception was people who had seen a picket line first-hand, who rejected the media’s version of events. Philo concluded that the media strongly shapes public understanding of social issues and that most people rely on traditional news sources to form their views.
The cultural effects model highlights:
- The dominant class’s influence on media content, promoting a shared ideology among journalists.
- Media’s biased portrayal favouring the dominant class, but audiences actively interpret content differently.
- Audience responses are influenced by factors like social circumstances, experiences, education, class, values, and beliefs.
- Over time, media significantly shapes people’s views, leading to the acceptance of the dominant hegemonic perspective as common sense.
Cultural effect Model A03
- It assumes media personnel like journalists work within the framework and assumptions of the dominant ideology. This fails to recognize that journalists have some independence in their work
- It suggests the audience can, through selective filtering, have some control over their response to media output, but long-term socialization by the media through repetitive messages may limit the ability of audiences to filter those messages,
- The uses and gratifications model
The uses and gratifications model starts with a view that media audiences are thinking, active and creative human
beings, who use the media in various ways for their own various pleasures and interests (gratifications).
- The uses and gratifications model
McQuail (1972) and Lull (1990, 1995)
- Diversion
- Personal relationships.
- Personal identity:
- Surveillance:
- Background wallpaper: while doing other things.