Topic 5: Accuracy of Eye Witness Testimony Flashcards

1
Q

what are the three factors which affect the accuracy of EWT

A

leading questions
post event discussion
anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are leading questions

A

questions which, because of the way it’s phrases, suggest a certain answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who’s research supports leading questions

A

Loftus and Palmer (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

outline Loftus and Palmer’s procedure

A
  • 45 american uni students divided into 5 groups
  • each group shown same 7 clips of car crashes
  • “About how fast were the cars going when they [verb] each other?”
  • verbs were smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contacted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

outline Loftus and Palmer’s findings

A
  • estimated speed varied based on the verb used
  • smashed produced highest speed of 40.8 but contacted produced lowest speed of 31.8
  • shows that choice of verb influenced participants perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

outline Loftus and Palmer’s conclusion

A
  • wording of questions can distort eyewitnesses memory
  • memory is not a perfect recording and can be influenced by external factors like language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the follow up study

A

Loftus and Zanni (1975)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

outline Loftus and Zanni’s procedure

A
  • group of participants watched a video of a car accident
  • participants were asked either: “did you see a/the broken headlight?”
  • definitive vs non definitive
  • there was no broken headlight
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

outline Loftus and Zanni’s findings

A
  • 17% said yes to the definitive
  • 7% said yes to the non-definitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

give one piece of contradicting research

A

yuille and cutshall (1986)
- witnesses of an armed robbery gave very accurate reports of crime 4 months later even with misleading questions
- real life study - ecologically valid
- leading questions don’t make a difference with real life crime?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate the generalisability of research into leading questions

A

P. research was done on uni students, hard to generalise universally
E. uni students usually have an above average IQ so their memories may be more efficient
E. they are younger and research shows that memory ability declines with age
L. study is limited in how far it can be used to explain effect of LQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluate the practical applications of research into leading questions

A

P. research has led to useful practical applications for society
E. research has contributed to development of enhanced cognitive interview used by police
E. eliminates leading questions usage in EWT
L. benefited criminal investigations in real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaluate the internal validity of research into leading questions

A

P. well controlled lab experiments
E. experiments have high internal validity
E. we can make statements about cause and effect
L. validity of research strengthens the support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaluate the external validity of research into leading questions

A

P. they lack external validity because they are lab experiments
E. this is because they take place in artificial and uncontrolled settings
E. participant would expect the accident so they’d pay attention
L. difficult to generalise findings to real life EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is post event discussion

A

when witnesses to a crime discuss the events with others, their memories can become contaminated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what factors can lead to post event discussion

A

Retroactive Interference, memory conformity, and repeated interviewing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

outline retroactive interference as a factor that leads to PED

A
  • hearing about a crime on news or conversation could contaminate the original memory of events#
  • as this new info may interfere, the accuracy of your memory could get called into Q
  • in many countries, pre trial publicity is prohibited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

outline memory conformity as a factor that leads to PED

A
  • many eyewitnesses have a desire to be correct and accepted
  • if the eyewitness was to hear other testimonies, they could change their testimony consciously or unconsciously
  • in high pressure environment of a court, we naturally have a drive to feel accepted
  • in many countries, efforts are made to try and keep eyewitnesses apart
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

outline repeat interviewing as a factor that leads to PED

A
  • psychologists believe that repeated interviewing could damage original memory of events due to the reconstructive nature of memory
  • subtle differences made in recall of events
  • police tend to record all interviews carefully to help minimise the risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

outline research to support PED as a negative impact on accuracy of EWT

A

Gabbert et al (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

describe procedure of gabbert et al study

A
  • participants watched a video of a girl stealing from a wallet
  • participants were put into pairs and told they saw the same perspective but they didn’t
  • participants discussed the video on what they saw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

describe findings of gabbert et al study

A
  • 71% of witnesses recalled information they had never seen
  • 60% said the girl was guilty even though they saw nothing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

evaluate research to support post event discussion

A

P. research supports
E. gabbert procedure
E. gabbert findings
L. PED clearly contaminates EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

evaluate individual differences of post event discussion

A

P. it may not account for other factors
E. eg individual differences - older people proven to be worse at EWT than younger people
E. research often uses younger people to be identified
L. implies that individual differences may affect the results of research into post event discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
evaluate the external validity of post event discussion
P. research suffers low external validity E. lab setting E. misses out key considerations such as anxiety L. research support for the effects of post event discussion may lack credibility
26
evaluate the practical applications of post event discussion
P. practical applications to help society E. separate eye witnesses to avoid memory contamination E. leads to more accurate EWT L. improves criminal investigations
27
what is anxiety
witnesses when they are in a state of high arousal - more likely if there is threat/danger
28
what are the 3 areas to consider when looking at how anxiety affects EWT
1. anxiety level of witness 2. weapon focus effect 3. increased violence
29
What does the Yerkes-Dodson law suggest
- performance and arousal are directly related - increase in arousal to a certain level can help boost performance - once arousal crosses optimal level, performance of individual diminishes
30
give research to support the Yerkes Dodson law
Deffenbacher et al (2004)
31
what did Deffenbacher find
- carried out a meta analysis of 63 studies - there was an increase in EWT accuracy up to high levels of anxiety - supports ideas proposed in the Yerkes Dodson law
32
what is the weapons focus effect
if a witness is anxious due to a threat, they may pay more attention to the threat and remember more about the thing that poses a threat and less about details
33
give research to support the weapons focus effect
Johnson and Scott (1976)
34
what were the two conditions of Johnson and Scott's (1976) study
condition 1: pts overheard a low key discussion in a lab about equipment failure. a person then emerged from the lab holding a pen in grease covered hands condition 2: pts overheard a heated and hostile debate between people in the lab. after the sound of breaking glass and crashing chairs, a man came out of the lab holding a letter opener covered in blood
35
what were the findings of Johnson and Scott's (1976) study
- they were then asked to recall the person from 50 photos 49% were able to recall the person when they held the pen 33% were able to recall the person when they held the letter opener
36
give research to support that violent crimes affecting EWT
Loftus and Burns (1982)
37
what was the procedure of Loftus and Burns (1982) study
- one group of participants saw a film of a crime with no violence - another group were shown the same film but with a violent incident (boy shot in face)
38
what were the findings of Loftus and Burns (1982) study
those who saw the violent incident recalled significantly less than those who saw the film without the violence - anxiety caused by the violence negatively affected recall
39
give research to support the fact that in real life situations EWT is still accurate besides anxiety
Yuille and Cutshall (1982)
40
what was the procedure of Yuille and Cutshall (1982) study
- 21 witnesses of fatal shooting => all were interviewed by police - 13 witnesses agreed to a research interview 4-5 months after
41
what was the results of Yuille and Cutshall (1982) study
- witnesses were highly accurate and little changed in amount or accuracy of recall over 5 months - only aspects of color memory, age, height and weight estimations differed - eyewitnesses resisted leading questions and stress levels at the time appeared to have no negative effects on memory
42
evaluate contradictory evidence into anxiety and EWT
P. there is contradictory evidence that criticises impact of weapons focus and anxiety on ewt E. Pickel 1998 hair salon - different item in each variation of footage E. recall was poorer in low threat high unusualness condition (raw chicken) compared to high threat (scissors) and control conditions (wallety) L. accuracy can be affected by unusualness of an item not the threat it poses
43
evaluate the internal validity of research into anxiety and EWT
P. studies are often well controlled and have high internal validity E. Loftus and Burns are well controlled - establish cause and effect E. level of anxiety during violence was responsible for changes in recall L. research provides good support for theory - credible
44
evaluate the reliability of research into anxiety and EWT
P. high level of control increases reliability E. standardised procedures E. Loftus and burns: two experimental conditions L. study can be replicated with ease to check consistency
45
evaluate the external validity of research into anxiety and EWT
P. reliance on lab experiments - low external validity E. crime is usually viewed on video E. less threatening and anxiety provoking L. not as generalisable to real life EWT
46
evaluate inconsistent findings of research into anxiety and EWT
P. inconsistent findings are present E. Christian and Herbinette (1993) - 110 witnesses of 22 bank robberies E. bystanders + victims; some showed more detailed and accurate recall than others L. contradicts findings of experimental research - reduces credibility
47
what is the cognitive interview
procedure used by police during interviews. uses recall strategies to increase accuracy of memories
48
who made the cognitive interview
Fischer and Gieselman (1985,1992)
49
what are the 4 cognitive interview techniques
- mental reinstatement of original context - report everything - change order - change perspective
50
what is mental reinstatement of original context
witness is asked to recreate mentally the context of incident imagining themselves at the scene with emotional responses
51
why is mental reinstatement of original context important
gives witnesses contextual and emotional cues from when event happened
52
what is report everything
asking witnesses to tell police every single detail of their memories of the event
53
why is reporting everything important
memories are often interconnected so by recalling an irrelevant piece of information it may then cue a whole lot of information
54
what is change order
recalling events in an unusual order (backwards) it may help witnesses recall things which don't fit in with schemes
55
why is change order important
witnesses may fill in blanks on what they expect to happen so by changing order it may prevent this happening
56
what is change perspective
witnesses putting themselves in the place of other victims/witnesses
57
why is change perspective important
witnesses may fill in blanks on what they expect to happen so by changing perspective it may prevent this happening
58
what are techniques in the enhanced cognitive interview
- witness led - open ended questions - minimal distractions - slow speech - no guessing - anxiety reduction
59
evaluate the strength of research to support the cognitive interview
P. Kohnken et al (1909) research supports E. conducted a meta analysis E. found that compared to standard interviewing techniques, CI was more accurate L. so CI is more effective than regular techniques
60
evaluate the practical use of the cognitive interview
P. there are practical problems with the use of the cognitive interview E. police aren't given enough training E. they only received 4 hours of training which lacked information L. Ci needs more training which is impossible with police budget
61
evaluate further practical problems with use of cognitive interview (Kebbell and Wagstaff 1999)
P.further practical problems E. kebbell and wagstaff survey report said police used Ci E. takes time to conduct and worried about large amount of incorrect information L. may be difficult for police to use CI in practical - limits usefulness
62
evaluate the effectiveness of the cognitive interview
P. important to consider the way the CI is used that may make it more or less effective E. Milne + Bull (2002) found all 4 techniques used singularly produced more recall than standard interview E. however the Report everything and CR combination had less recall than individually using other parts L. whole CI isn't necessary for higher recall