Topic 4: The Rise to Dominance of the United States of America Flashcards
What were the beginnings of settlement in the US?
- English settlements of North-East America began in the early 17C as private ventures, initially to grow tobacco as the cash crop and/or for fur trading. These colonies grew with arrivals from Europe.
○ Also grew from refugees from Europe
○ English, Dutch and German - often indentured servants or those seeking religious freedom (e.g. the Puritans), Quakers in Pennsylvania- The earliest colonies were Virginia (1607) - tobacco farming, Massachusetts (Plymouth 1620, Salem 1626, Massachusetts Bay 1630 - fur trading), Maryland (1634), Rhode Island (1644), Connecticut (1639), Pennsylvania (1681) - Quakers, Delaware (1702), North and South Carolina (1670); whilst New York and New Jersey were originally settled by Dutch and Swede settlers in 1620s and taken over by the English in 1664 and 1681 respectively.
How were the American Colonies divided in 1750? What did each region specialise in?
- The 13 states before the war of independence
- New England Region: Massachusetts, New Hampshire - major ports were there
○ Manufacturing, light handcrafts
○ Fur trading - Middle Region: New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey
○ Fertile land for agriculture
○ Became bread basket for these colonies - Southern: Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia
○ Relied on crop farming
○ Initially tobacco using slaves, and then later on cotton
§ West Africans used
○ These were the slave states
○ Free settlers avoided the southern states
○ European immigrants tended to avoid these states - These were separated with the Appalachians
- On the other side was the Middle colonies and the southern colonies such as Ohio (British settlement)
- The New England region colonies with poor land for agriculture but with ports well situated for trading became the major early manufacturing centres.
- The Middle colonies of New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey offered fertile land for agriculture and became the bread basket of the colonies.
It was the Southern colonies of Maryland, Virginia and Georgia that were most suitable for growing the cash crops of tobacco on plantations using African slaves in labour gangs from the mid-18C. Along with North and South Carolina, these colonies became the slave plantation colonies. European immigrants avoided these colonies because of lack of opportunity.
- New England Region: Massachusetts, New Hampshire - major ports were there
What was the growth of American colonies pre- American War of Independence? What were American colonies’ role in relation to Britain?
- By the eve of American War of Independence (1775-1783) the colonial population had grown to nearly two-and-half million, probably consisting of over 400,000 black slaves.
- Because the living standards of the white population was relatively high, American colonies became a valuable foreign market for British manufactures in the 18C as well as a means to obtain needed raw materials and re-exports (i.e. tropical products, chiefly tobacco).
- Britain fought and won the ‘French and Indian War’ (1754-62) in the Ohio Valley to ensure westward expansion of the American colonies.
○ British effectively defeated the French
○ George Washington fought in this war on the British side
What was the nature of government of the Colonies?
- An important factor in the cause of the American War of Independence (1775-1783) is that all thirteen English colonies* were self-governing with their own charter in which there was an appointed Royal Governor, assisted by his Council of advisors and with elected assemblies whose delegates were elected by whites with property.
○ Already established governments
○ Probably more democratic than the British Parliament
○ Local and could deal with local issues- With enlightenment these assemblies, who could propose legislation, increasingly came into conflict with their British appointed Governors over policies affecting the rights of their colonial citizens.
○ Assemblies felt that their autonomy was being constrained over time- Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Georgia, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina, Rhode Island.
- With enlightenment these assemblies, who could propose legislation, increasingly came into conflict with their British appointed Governors over policies affecting the rights of their colonial citizens.
What were the major causes of the American War of Independence?
○ British land policy to deny colonies (in particular, Virginia) land for settlement west of the Appalachians via ‘The Quebec Act 1774’ secured by French and Indian War.
§ British decided the land open for expansion (towards the West)
§ Colonies, particularly Virginia, did not have access to it
§ Land sale was a major source of revenue for governments
○ British trade policy under the Navigation Acts constrained the colonial merchants as well as production of manufactures that could compete with British industry (e.g. prohibition against import of iron manufactures but not pig iron). This was a source of concern mainly for the New England colonies.
§ Source of tension - economic autonomy
○ After the expensive ‘Seven Years’ War’ in 1763 the British imposed greater taxation (i.e. on tea, glass and paper) on the colonies to pay for their defence and effectively curb the powers of the American colonies. It was an arrogant and stupid reaction by the British authorities to colonial protests to these measures which ignited the war.
§ E.g. the Stamp act of 1765, the Townshend Acts of 1767
§ The taxes imposed were less than those in Britain - but the Americans did not feel this way
○ 1774: coercive act by the British Government to end self-government in Massachusetts
§ This followed the Boston Tea Party - dumped 342 chests of tea from a ship that was ready into Boston harbour
When was the Birth of the United States?
What was in the Constitution?
- The United States of America was officially born 4 March 1789 when Congress declared its Constitution effective.
- The constitution ensured that all states would be forbidden to impose discriminatory interstate transit duties on goods and services with Federal government customs duties, taxes and regulations applied uniformly to states. Private property rights secured consistent with a prescribed system of land sales for settlement.
○ Government itself responsible for selling land to settlers - An independent nation with a government capable of acting in the best interests of its own peoples was clearly the most important event in the successful economic development of the United States of America. Without independence the economic development of the American colonies would over time have been considerably hampered by its subjugation to the interests of Britain and industrialisation much delayed.
- The constitution ensured that all states would be forbidden to impose discriminatory interstate transit duties on goods and services with Federal government customs duties, taxes and regulations applied uniformly to states. Private property rights secured consistent with a prescribed system of land sales for settlement.
What was the territorial expansion of the US between 1790 and 1853?
- By treaty with Britain the territory of the original 13 colonies together with the westward land up to the Mississippi River, was about 890,00 square miles. The Louisiana Purchase of land from Napoleon in 1803 added 827,000 square miles.
○ Napoleon realised he was better off selling it
○ Nearly doubles the territory- In 1819, by treaty with Spain, Florida was acquired, adding another 72,000 square miles. In 1836 the Texans revolted against Mexico to become an independent nation, before joining the union in 1845, adding a further 390,000 square miles.
○ Texas used to be part of Mexico - Settlement of a longstanding dispute with Britain in 1846 added Oregon Country of 286,000 square miles to the Union. On settlement of the Mexican war in 1848, what became the states of California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico plus the Gadsden Purchase from Mexico in 1853 added another 556,000 square miles of territory. The total land area from the Atlantic to the Pacific was 1.9 billion square miles in 1853.
- In 1819, by treaty with Spain, Florida was acquired, adding another 72,000 square miles. In 1836 the Texans revolted against Mexico to become an independent nation, before joining the union in 1845, adding a further 390,000 square miles.
When were the early stages of industrialisation in the US?
- When the USA became an independent nation in the 1780s the industrial revolution had begun in Britain.
- On independence, the United States economy was agrarian-based with about 75% of the labour force employed in agriculture. Nevertheless, there was a small manufacturing-handcraft industry, mainly producing textiles and other household goods, and mainly situated in the north-east population centres (Boston, Massachusetts)
- Modern technology was imported from Britain, often introduced by immigrants, and applied where profitable.
Industrialisation only began in earnest from the 1820s onwards.
What were the policies by Alexander Hamilton?
Policy of Protection
- Alexander Hamilton, as first secretary of US Treasury, released his Report of Manufactures in 1791 recommending government support of manufacturing by subsidies and import tariffs.
- Given Britain’s overwhelming competitive dominance in manufactures the ‘infant industry’ argument (later associated with Friedrich List) resonated and protectionist policy was firmly established.
○ Needed support until they were big enough to stand on their own two feet
- Tariffs started out in the 1790s at about 15% but rose sharply in the 1820s and peaking at 62% by 1830. By 1860 they declined to 20%.
○ On manufactured goods
- An important factor was that Federal Government revenue depended on customs duties.
○ Obtain fiscal revenue and protect industries
What was Henry Clay’s guiding policy of economic development?
- The dominant political figure in the first half of the nineteenth century was Henry Clay, who developed a guiding policy of economic development by which to bind and unify the ‘Union’ which he called the ‘American System’. The policy basically consisted of three elements:
1. A tariff of 20-25% on import goods to protect and develop domestic manufacturing. (imported manufactured goods)
2. Federal government investment (including funding assistance to state investment) in infrastructure - a national transportation system of roads, bridges, harbors and canals to commercially and politically bind the union.
3. A Federal Government national bank to hold and distribute federal funds, float government bonds and loans and print and distribute a national currency in place of state and private bank currencies (e.g. ‘Second Bank of the United States’ - chartered bank under congress).
§ America did not have a central bank for most of its industrialisation
§ This was also part of Alexander Hamilton’s policies
§ Why the first Bank was not renewed - believed it was state’s rights to have control over their currency and monetary systems - e.g. Jefferson opposed a national bank and militia
Who was Henry Clay?
- Henry Clay (1777-1852), was a lawyer, politician and skilled orator who represented Kentucky in the United States Senate and House of Representatives. He served three terms as Speaker of the House and was Secretary of State from 1825 to 1829. He was the leading proponent of the ‘American System’ policy, fighting for an increase in tariffs to foster industry in the United States, the use of federal funding to build and maintain infrastructure, and a strong national bank. He was Abraham Lincoln’s mentor.
• Lincoln would set the policy direction after the Civil War- Clay was the most important political force in keeping the ‘union’ together till the 1850s, enabling the North to become powerful enough to ultimately resolve the stain of slavery by civil war to establish a unified and genuinely free nation.
• Probably becomes most important politician in America in first half of the 19th C
• Never became president - probably had too many enemies
- Clay was the most important political force in keeping the ‘union’ together till the 1850s, enabling the North to become powerful enough to ultimately resolve the stain of slavery by civil war to establish a unified and genuinely free nation.
What were Henry Clay’s Crucial Brokered Compromises?
- When new territories are brought into the union, there were problems
- Missouri Compromise of 1820
• Admitted Missouri as slave state and Maine as free state to maintain balance of free to slave state senators. Slavery forbidden in all westward territory above latitude 36◦30’, a line determined by the southern boundary of Missouri. It was undone by Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 that did open up tensions that led to civil war. - Tariff and Nullification Crisis of 1833
• A compromise by gradual reduction of tariff over 10 years to a minimum of 10% ad valorum (to prevent Federal conflict with South Carolina).
• Southern states began to acquire nearly majority in the house
• Prevent them from leaving the union - Texas Annexation Crisis of 1836
• Recognition of Texas independence but indefinite postponement of annexation to maintain Senate balance
§ Texas broke away from Mexico
• Texas were not allowed to become part of the union until later - Compromise of 1850 over Slavery Question
• California a free state, Nevada and Utah to decide on status; abolition of slave trade in District of Columbia but stricter Fugitive Slave Law.
• Slaves would leave their state to go to the North - law - they had to be returned to their owners. Some Northern states started anti-slavery movements in the 1840s
- Missouri Compromise of 1820
What was the impact of American Protectionist Policy?
- The protectionist policy created tensions between the North and the South (i.e. southern ‘slavery’ states). With the economy depending heavily on cotton exports (to Britain), the South wanted low tariffs. Tariff protection involved a deal between the North and Western states (mid-west today) in which high protection was given in exchange for Federal expenditures on land improvements in the west (key figure was Henry Clay, Senator/Congressman of Kentucky).
- The tariff question was indeed a contributing factor to the civil war. When Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860, it was on the plank of maintaining increased protection. Lincoln himself was a strong protectionist who followed Henry Clay’s longstanding ‘American System’ policy, comprising industry protection together with infrastructure development.
• Lincoln’s position: did not want slavery to expand further. Southern states did not accept him as president - During the Civil War the Lincoln administration raised tariffs in 1862 and then still higher in 1864 to raise revenue to meet rising war expenditures. Indeed, the victory of the North ensured the US continued with its longstanding protectionist policy of its manufacturing industry until the First World War.
- US manufacturing enjoyed the greatest protection from foreign competition of any nation in the nineteenth century. After the civil war tariff rates on manufactured products usually varied between 40% to 50% and, in 1913, when the US was the mightiest industrial nation, it was still 40%.
Although today there is much revisionist history suggesting protection was in fact counterproductive, the fact remains that under this protectionist umbrella US industry had sole access to the biggest and fastest growing national market in the world and grew at a faster rate and on a greater scale than ever before experienced.
- The tariff question was indeed a contributing factor to the civil war. When Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860, it was on the plank of maintaining increased protection. Lincoln himself was a strong protectionist who followed Henry Clay’s longstanding ‘American System’ policy, comprising industry protection together with infrastructure development.
Describe the state of Antebellum industrial development in the US?
- By 1860 industrialisation in the US was well under way with only 56% of the population employed in agriculture and over 14% in manufacturing. Indeed, by the time of the Civil War (1860s) the US was the second largest industrial economy behind Britain, but a long way behind Britain and its iron and engineering industry was perhaps technologically inferior to that of Germany.
- Led initially by the textiles sector, manufacturing industry progressively became more innovative and productive as the widening in markets provided profitable opportunities for enterprises to implement more mechanized techniques.
- Along with the rapid growth in population, population density in the north-east and better transport infrastructure increased the market size for manufactures as well as lowered the transport costs of inputs.
• Pattern of development is westward
What was a main characteristic of american innovation?
- An early established feature of American innovation was the use of standardisation in the design of products and in the production process. The main emphasis in the design of machinery was to save on skilled labour that was short in supply even if this involved the wasteful use of raw material inputs that were by contrast in abundance.
- An early example of this ‘system’ was in armoury production when the Federal Government in 1798 commissioned Eli Whitney to produce 10,000 muskets and Simeon North pistols for the militia. Both produced the arms by designing stamping and cutting machines to make identical interchangeable parts that with minimum hand filing by unskilled labour were assembled into final products. In this way they were able to overcome the shortage of skilled armourers and produce arms more cheaply with lower cost of maintenance.
• Need less skilled labour - It is argued by some historians that a characteristic of American technological development is that it was labour-saving but material-consuming because skilled labour was in short supply whilst material resources were abundant.
- An early established characteristic of innovation was the use of ‘standardisation’ American
- Wood in machinery –etc wood coke in iron industry – but to further simplify production process along Adam Smith’ division of labour because of lack of skilled workers -
- An early example of this ‘system’ was in armoury production when the Federal Government in 1798 commissioned Eli Whitney to produce 10,000 muskets and Simeon North pistols for the militia. Both produced the arms by designing stamping and cutting machines to make identical interchangeable parts that with minimum hand filing by unskilled labour were assembled into final products. In this way they were able to overcome the shortage of skilled armourers and produce arms more cheaply with lower cost of maintenance.
What was the American System of manufacturing? What did it represent?
- What became known as the ‘American System of Manufacturing’ – simplicity of design, standardisation, interchangeable manufacture and large-scale output – had become common in the textile and light consumer goods industries by the mid-nineteenth century.
- Within a couple of decades it was widely employed in the heavy industries of mining and metal-processing as well as the machine-making industry.
- The American system was highly productive with labour productivity generally greater in US manufacturing than that in British and European industry.
• Further sophistication of the division of labour
• Reliant on large-scale demand for product and economies of scale - The American industry’s superior way of innovation in the organisation of assembly line production essentially represented a better application of Adam Smith’s division of labour in which simplification in the stages of the production process enabled greater labour-saving mechanization (i.e. machinery).
- A reason why perhaps American innovation developed this character was the relatively higher cost of labour in the nineteenth century arising from the opportunity cost to workers of alternatively acquiring cheap land and becoming a settler/farmer on the frontier which helps explain the persistent shortage of skilled labour.
What was the role of innovation on machine making?
- In the American way innovation became central to industry with an endless stream of profit-seeking entrepreneurs willing to try new methods and change machinery as well as to produce a better product for the consumer.
- On the demand side, American consumers developed a want for factory-made products that were simple, functional and inexpensive and would readily change to new better products even before they used up existing ones (especially true of labour-saving tools such as shovels, axes etc).
• Large amounts of obsolescence of consumer products
• Also led to greater obsolescence of investment
• Pressure to always innovate and produce new techniques - Product designs tended to be tailored to machine capabilities so that profit-making was dependent on technical innovation in machine design and production. The machine-making and tool industries became central to US industrial development.
- Rapid consumer and machine obsolescence magnified both consumption and investment growth.
- On the demand side, American consumers developed a want for factory-made products that were simple, functional and inexpensive and would readily change to new better products even before they used up existing ones (especially true of labour-saving tools such as shovels, axes etc).
What sorts of resources did the technologies use in US Industry?
- A feature of US industry is the ready use of raw materials, especially wood, that was in abundant supply and relatively cheap. Hence, up to the mid-nineteenth century wood was employed wherever possible as a substitute for metals in the production of tools, machinery and transport equipment and in construction. In 1860 the lumber industry was second only to cotton textiles.
- The cheapness of wood also meant the iron industry continued to employ charcoal in small furnaces. With the development of transportation in the north-east linking ironworks to coal mines producing the right quality coking coal the American iron and steel industry quickly developed technologically.
• Also no shortage of coal - Pennsylvania coal fields - Whilst the steam engine was widely in use, as late as 1869 nearly half the motive power used in industry was water. Steam power applied to manufacturing required the material of metal and wood was less useful.
- The cheapness of wood also meant the iron industry continued to employ charcoal in small furnaces. With the development of transportation in the north-east linking ironworks to coal mines producing the right quality coking coal the American iron and steel industry quickly developed technologically.
What was the state of antebellum industrial development?
- Industrialisation was well under way in the US by the time of the Civil War with the pattern of development well established:
• Westward settlement of the country accommodating a fast growing population (at the expense of the indigenous Indians!)
§ Particularly the Prairie Territory: Indiana, Ohio
• Higher population density and urbanisation in the north-east
• Considerable development in transport and communications linking resources to production and the latter to markets
• Highly innovative and dynamically productive manufacturing sector, led by the cotton textiles and consumer-producing industries – driven by a rapidly expanding internal market from population growth and transport development.- One impediment was over whether slavery should be allowed to spread from the South to any states westward – so undermining the demand-driven economic development of the US based on the consumption growth of ‘free labour’.
• Slavery for internal development - not sustainable
• Slaves didn’t generate much consumption/demand
- One impediment was over whether slavery should be allowed to spread from the South to any states westward – so undermining the demand-driven economic development of the US based on the consumption growth of ‘free labour’.
What were the implications of the American Civil War and when was it?
Implications of the American Civil War 1861-1865
- There are different views about the cause of the civil war, but the spread of slavery to westward states of America was certainly a key contributing factor which the north was not going to tolerate. Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg speech made abolition of slavery an objective of the war so giving the war a moral purpose (i.e. ‘honour’) in achieving union of the country ‘with a new birth of freedom’.
- It is estimated in 1860 there were 2.9 million black slaves in the Southern plantation states who would be freed in 1865.
- The war cost 600,000 lives, around 9% of the male population aged 15 to 39.
• New casualties from developments in new calibre rifles and their bullets
- The US was able to industrially develop according to the principles of free action without being weighed down by slavery and its moribund form of production.
- The postbellum South remained economically depressed into the twentieth century racked by poverty and racism.
• Cotton farming became much less profitable, breakdown of all the estates, new approach of sharecropping, raw cotton became more competitive in other parts of the world (e.g. Middle East)
• Jim Crowe policies introduced in the South - until the 1950s and 60s until Civil Rights legislations were introduced in the South
What was the role of Transport and Communications in building a national market?
- It is difficult to underestimate how important transport and communications was to American 19C economic development of such a large and territorially expanding country. With settlers pouring continuously into ever western lands, transport infrastructure was necessary to bind the expanding population into an expanding national market that stimulated industrialisation.
- Early in the 19C the development of transportation was in roads, canals and steamboats. In 1808 the Secretary of Treasury, Albert Gallatin, advanced a comprehensive system for internal land and water transport in the eastern part of country, called the ‘Gallatin Plan’, to be financed by the Federal Government. The plan was largely fulfilled by private entrepreneurs with state and Federal assistance to expand transport in the north-east and mid-west (under the tariff deal).
When were turnpike roads built, what was their impact?
- Turnpike roads for inter-city travel were built in the early 19C. Over $25 million of private capital was invested in several hundred turnpike companies so that between 1810 and 1830 turnpike roads opened increased from around 4,600 miles to 27,800 miles.
- Because the turnpike companies were typically small and relied on tolls on fairly short distances as part of a longer connecting road, profitability was poor. Their freight transport capacity, relying on horse drawn carriages, was not great.
- By the 1830s turnpikes had been overtaken by canals, then by the railroads, and they were subsequently abandoned.
When was the American canal-building era? What was its impact?
- The American canal-building era dates from 1815 to 1860 when it is estimated that nearly $100 million was invested, close to 70% coming from governments.
- The first major canal was the Eerie Canal in 1825 that ran for 363 miles from the Hudson River to Lake Eerie in the mid-west. This canal reduced shipping costs by at least one-third and provided an important link between agricultural mid-west and the industrial urbanised north-east. The success of this canal, induced greater foreign investment, and led to a number of feeder canals built as well as to other states investing in canals such as the Main Line and the Wabash and Eerie along the Ohio River.
- By 1860 the extensive canal network of north-east to mid-west America was quite impressive and provided the foundation in transport infrastructure for early industrialisation and urbanisation in the north-east.