Topic 4 Flashcards
Continuous data
Numerical data that can take any value within a given range, e.g. heights and weights
Discrete data
Numerical data that can only take certain values, e.g. shoe size
Quantitative data
Results that can be expressed using numerical values
Qualitative data
Results that can’t be expressed as numbers, e.g. opinions
Proportional symbols map
good - Illustrates the differences between many places
bad - Not easy to calculate the actual value
good - Easy to read
bad - Time-consuming to construct
Choropleth map
bad - Makes it seem as if there is an abrupt change in the boundary, Distinguishing between shades can be difficult
good - Shows a large amount of data, The clear visual impression of the changes over space
Scatter graph
good - Clearly shows data correlation, Shows the spread of data
bad - Data points cannot be labelled, Too many data points can make it difficult to read
Pie chart
good - Clearly shows the proportion of the whole,Easy to compare different components
bad - Does not show changes over time, hard to compare two sets of data
Population pyramid
good - Easy to compare age and sex data
bad - Can take a long time to construct
good - Easy to read and annotate
bad - Detail can be lost in the data
Compound or divided bar chart
good - A large amount of data can be shown on one graph
bad -bar chart can be difficult to read if there are multiple segments
good - Percentages and frequencies can be displayed on divided bar chart
bad - Can be difficult to compare sometimes
bar chart
good - Summarises a large set of data
bad - Requires additional information
good - Easy to interpret and construct
bad - Does not show causes, effects or patterns, can be too simplistic
Line graph
good - Shows trends and patterns clearly
bad - Does not show causes or effects
good - Quicker and easier to construct than a bar graph
bad - Can be misleading if the scales on the axis are altered
Histograms
good - Large data sets can be graphed easily
bad - They can only be used for numerical data
good -You can compare data
bad - Can be difficult to pinpoint exact data values
secondary sources
Leaflets
Posters
Newspapers
Journals
Relief
Height and shape of ground surface, named features, overall appearance
Physical features
Vegetation, climate, relief, drainage, distinct features
Human features
Grouping of buildings - offices, homes, factories etc. Urban or rural or fringe settlements.
Qualitative Data strengths and weaknesses
good -
More in-depth than quantitative data
More valid than quantitative data
bad -
Often a small sample size
Enquiries are not easy to duplicate
Quantitative Data strengths and weaknesses
good -
Possible to have a larger sample size
Information can often be collected quickly
bad -
the meaning behind the results is not clear
Human error or equipment error can lead to mistakes in measurement
Primary Data strengths and weaknesses
good -
Know that the data is reliable and valid
The data is specific to the enquiry
bad -
Time-consuming
May need specialist equipment/resources
secondary data strengths and weaknesses
good -
Easy to access
Low cost or free
bad -
It is not specific to the enquiry
No control over the data quality