TOPIC 3 - RISK AND RETURN Flashcards
Economy’s equilibrium level of real interest rates depends on
1) willingness of households to save
2) government fiscal and monetary policy
what reflects the willingness of households to save (as the driver of the economy’s equilibrium real interest rate)
reflected in the supply curve of funds and on the expected profitability of business investment in PPE and inventories as reflected in the demand curve for funds.
nominal rate of interest =
equilibrium real rate + expected rate of inflation.
in general can expected real rates of interest be observed?
No. can only observe nominal interest rates and from them we must infer expected real rates using inflation forecasts.
assets with guaranteed nominal interest rates are risky or safe
risky in real terms because the future inflation rate is uncertain
equilibrium expected rate of return on any security =
sum of the equilibrium real rate of interest, the expected rate of inflation and a security-specific premium,
Investors face a tradeoff btw
risk and expected return.
Historical data confirms what?
assets with low risk levels should provide lower returns on average than those with higher risk
historical rates of return over the last century in other countries suggests what about the US history of stock returns?
suggests the US history of stock returns isn’t an outlier compared to other countries
Historical returns on stock exhibit larger or smaller deviations from the mean than would be predicted from a normal distribution
larger, BUT discrepancies from the normal distribution tends to be minor and inconsistent across various measures of tail risk and have declined in recent years.
The lower partial standard deviation (LPSD), skew and kurtosis of the actual distribution quantify the deviation from normality.
What are the two widely used measures of tail risk?
1) value at risk (VaR)
2) expected shortfall (equivalent to conditional tail expectations)
What does Value at Risk (VaR) measure?
loss that will be exceeded with a specified probability (ie 1 or 5%)
What does the expected shortfall (ES) measure
expected rate of return conditional on the portfolio falling below a certain value, Thus, 1% ES is the expected value of the outcomes that lie in the bottom 1% of the distribution.
Conditional value at risk/ES is derived from the value at risk for a portfolio or investment.
Do investments in risky portfolios become safer in the long run?
NO. The longer a risky investment is held, the greater the risk!!!
The basis of the argument that stocks are safe in the long run is the fact that
the probability of an investment shortfall becomes smaller.
However, probability of shortfall is a poor measure of the safety of an investment because it ignores the magnitude of possible losses.
Whilst we have theories about relationship between risk and expected return that should prevail in rational capital markets, there is no theory about
the levels of risk we should find in the market place
given there’s no theory about the level of risk we should find in the market place, at best we can:
estimate from historical experience the level of risk that investors are likely to confront
given expected return nor risk are directly observable, what can we only observe?
realised rates of return (gains the investment made, offset by its losses and adjusted for inflation.)
–> provide noisy estimates of the expected returns and anticipated risk.
what’s the issue with relying historical rates of return?
No matter what the historical record says, we can’t guarantee it shows the worst an best that might be thrown in the future
holding period return =
total return earned on an investment during the time that it has been held
r(T) = [(Income generated) + (End value - initial value P(T))]/Initial value P(T)
P(T) = price paid today for a zero coupon bond with maturity date T, –> over the life of the bond the value of the investment grows by the multiple 100/P(T)
what does the holding period return formula show?
the longer you invest ur $ the higher returns you’ll get
How do we compare returns on investments with differing horizons? (ie, 0 coupon bond with longer maturity has lower PV and lower price, thus providing higher return).
effective annual rate
effective annual rate is defined as the % increase in funds per year –> what are we re-expressing?
we re-express each total return as a rate of return over a common period
EAR formula
= 1+ nominal rate/no. compounding periods
effective interest =
interest rate that’s adjusted for compounding over a given period
for a 1 year investment, the EAR is simply the:
total return on the bond, the % increase in the value of the investment which is (for investments <1 yr we compound the 1/2 yr return)
annual percentage rate (APR) vs effective annual rates (EAR)
EAR explicitly account for compound interest
APR just use simple interest and ignore compounding (use for short-term investments with holding periods <1 yr)
1 + EAR =
(1+ APR/n) ^n
it explicitly accounts for compound interest
APR =
n x [(1+ EAR)^1/n -1]
annualised using simple rather than compound interest
If you have an EAR and APR applied to the same 1 year investment at the same interest rate which will be higher?
the EAR, bc it increases each month by the multiple