Topic 2 - Regulation of Financial Institutions Flashcards
In terms of government regulation, the last 50 years is often divided into three periods:
- 1.1Regulation (pre-1980s)
- 1.2Deregulation (1980s)
- 1.3Post-deregulation (1990s onward)
Two key events in the history of regulation are: 2.1.4The Wallis Inquiry (1997)
2.1.5The Murray Inquiry (2014)
Prior to the 1980s, banks were subject to very stringent regulation, including restrictions on:
Who could operate as a bank The entry of foreign banks The types and maturity of deposits The size and type of loans made Interest rates paid and received A Liquid and Government Securities ratio A Statutory Reserve Deposit ratio
During the 1980s, the level of regulation faced by banks was progressively eased:
Monetary and interest rate controls were eased or lifted
Building societies were permitted to become banks Foreign banks were allowed to operate in Australia The Australian dollar was floated
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WALLISINQUIRY
The Campbell Inquiry (1981) and the Martin Review (1984) led to the 1980s deregulation
By the 1990s there was a need to establish wide-ranging enquiry to evaluate the Australian financial system
The Financial Systems Inquiry was established in June 1996 and reported in April 1997, and is usually referred to as the Wallis Inquiry (after its chairman, Stan Wallis)
Terms of reference for the Wallis Inquiry
Considering the impact of the deregulation during the 1980s
Analysing the forces likely to drive further change Making recommendations on regulatory arrangements affecting the financial system
Taking account of, but not making recommendations on, monetary policy, retirement incomes policy, the regulation of general companies and taxation policy
Most of the Report’s 115 recommendations were accepted, including
Restructuring regulatory arrangements so that the emphasis is now on regulation by function rather than by type of institution
Policies to promote greater competition within the financial system
The only significant recommendation that was not accepted was abolition of the “6 pillars policy”, although it became a “4 pillars policy”
MURRAY INQUIRY TERMS OF REFERENCE
The inquiry’s terms of reference were based on one overriding objective:
Position the financial system to best meet Australia’s evolving needs and support economic growth
The final report comprised two general themes: Funding the Australian economy: Removing distortions to efficiency
Competition: Allowing competition and market forces to drive the economy
The final report had five specific themes, and the final recommendations are grouped accordingly:
RESILIENCE –Strengthen the Australian economy by making the financial system more resilient
RETIREMENT INCOMES –Lift the value of the superannuation system and retirement incomes
INNOVATION –Drive economic growth and productivity through settings that promote innovation
CONSUMER OUTCOMES –Enhance confidence and trust by creating an environment in which financial firms treat customers fairly
REGULATORY SYSTEM –Enhance regulator independence and accountability, and minimise the need for future regulation
In its response to the Murray Inquiry final report, the government
Agreed with 41 of the report’s 44 recommendations, and will implement those recommendations, allow APRA to do so, or will consider how best to implement them in the future
Disagreed with 1 recommendation
Agreed with the objectives of the other 2 recommendations, but disagreed with the specific approach recommended by the report
Three components of current regulatory system
- 4.1The Reserve Bank of Australia
- 4.2The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
- 4.3The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)
The key element of the current approach to the regulation of financial institutions is:
2.4.4Prudential supervision
THE AUSTRALIAN PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY (APRA)
APRA was established by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 1998 as a result of the Wallis Inquiry APRA is responsible for the prudential supervision of:
Banks
Non-bank financial institutions
Insurance and superannuation companies
Prudential supervision
Prudential supervision refers to requirements to limit risk-taking by financial institutions, to ensure the safety of depositors’ funds and the stability of the financial system
There are 9 separate aspects to prudential supervision
Authorisation of banks Ownership and control of banks Association with non-banks Non-callable deposits Supervision of bank liquidity Exposure limits Capital adequacy External review Board attestation
Assessing the capital adequacy of a bank is a 6-step process
- Credit risk-weighted balance sheet assets
- Credit risk-weighted off-balance-sheet items
(a) Market-related transactions
(b) Non-market-related transactions - Notional market risk-weighted assets
- Calculating total assessed risk
- Identifying the capital base
- Calculating the Capital Adequacy Ratio
NamethethreemainregulatorybodiesinvolvedwiththeAustralianfinancialsector; identifytheirspecificareasofresponsibility.
TheReserveBankofAustraliaisresponsibleformonetarypolicy,systemicstabilityandthe paymentssystem. TheAustralianPrudentialRegulationAuthorityisresponsiblefortheprudentialregulationof deposittakingincludingbanks,buildingsocietiesandcreditunions,aswellasforinsuranceand superannuationinstitutions. TheAustralianSecuritiesandInvestmentsCommissionisresponsibleforconsumerprotection andmarketintegrity.