Topic 2 Flashcards
LABELLING AND SELF FULFILLING PROPHECY
Hartley and Sutton’s study of 140 children in three Kent primary schools
Children were assigned to work in two groups , the first were told that boys don’t perform as well as girls, the other group was not told this. They were then tested in maths, reading and writing. Boys in the first group performed significantly worse than those in the second. White girls performed better in both groups
Interactionist perspective
Micro or small scale detailed studies of what happens within the class room
Qualitative research methods like unstructured interviews or participant or non-participant observation. They seek to discover, upon interaction with others, teachers or pupils experience education.
What is labelling ?
The process of defining a person of group in a certain way- as a particular “type” of person or group.
Can contribute to the moulding of student identities and has been shown to affect educational performance
What is a stereotype?
A generalised oversimplifying View of the features of a social group, allowing for a few individual Differences between members of the group
Can produce a halo effect e.g if a teacher may think a student is bright etc even if they are not just because they are well mannered etc
Opposite also occurs
What is the Halo effect ?
When pupils become stereotypes, either favourably or unfavourably, on the basis of earlier impressions
What is self fulfilling prophecy ?
Where people act in response to predictions which have been made regarding their behaviour thereby making the prediction come true
Waterhouse (2004) on pivotal identity
Case study on 4 primary and secondary schools
Teacher labels pupil either label a pupil as either normal/ average or a deviant.
Affects the way a teacher interacts with pupils , Waterhouse says this produces a pivotal identity for students , a core identity providing a pivot from which classroom events are interpreted
Once established this affects the interpretation of specific classroom behaviour
For example: if a pupil was labelled with a pivotal identity as deviant is likely to have episodes of normal, conformist behaviour is thought by the teacher to be a temporary episode and the other way around
Becker (1971) on teacher stereotypes of the ideal pupil
Teachers initially evaluate pupils in relation to their stereotypes of the “ideal” pupil. Which set the standard for teachers judgements of the quality of young people as pupils and would represent the typical normal or average conforming pupil .
Hempel-Jorgensen (2009)
“Ideal pupil” research in 12 primary schools
Year long research - observation with children and semi structured interviews with teachers.
Pupils and teachers have same views of the ideal pupil and ideal learner when pupils were asked what the ideal pupil would be if they were to start school.
This influenced how children viewed themselves and classmates. It also affected their motivation, aspirations and academic attainments
Becker (1971) and Rist (1970) Social class affecting labelling
Social class and how far pupils conform to middle class standards of teachers, rather than their ability, were the most significant factors influencing student labelling.
Gillborn (2011)
Ideal pupil
Ideal pupil held by teachers is mainly white , do not see black students as academically successful.
Denying opportunity to black pupils especially black Caribbean pupils regardless of their social class,gender or ability
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968)
Evidence for self-fulfilling prophecy
Randomly chosen group of students whom teachers were told were bright and could be expected to make good progress even though they were no different from other students in terms of ability, did in fact make greater progress than students not so labelled
Hartley and Sutton (2011)
Gender affecting labelling and self fulfilling prophecy
Labelling, stereotypes and the expectations of teachers, as well as peers , parents and the media, generating a self-fulfilling prophecy with negative effects on performance of boys.
Study of 140 children in three Kent primary schools
Children assigned to two groups , with one told that boys do not perform as well as girls, and the others were not told this. They were then tested in maths , reading and writing. Boys in the first group performed significantly worse than those in the second. Suggests that boys poor performance nationally could be explained due to stereotyping
What is banding?
Either is where schools try to ensure their intakes have a spread of pupils drawn from all bands of ability , or more commonly is used as an alternative word for streaming
What is streaming?
Where in schools, students are divided into groups of similar ability (bands or streams) in which they stay for all subjects