Topic 1: Stressors in the Environment: Additional Studies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: What was the aim of the experiment?

A

To manipulate different features of noise to try to isolate aspects which cause the most stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: What did they give the participants, and list the 3 variables that they manipulated.

A

They gave participants simple cognitive tasks and were exposed to recordings that lasted 25 minutes. They manipulated:
1) Volume
2) Predictability
3) Perceived control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: Describe the manipulated variable ‘volume’.

A

56 or 108 decibels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: Describe the manipulated variable ‘predictability’.

A

9-second bursts at regular intervals or unpredictable bursts of irregular lengths.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: Describe the manipulated variable ‘perceived control’.

A

Some people were shown a switch & told they could stop the noise by pressing it, others were not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: Describe the 2nd stage (what did they measure).

A

In the 2nd stage, the noise was stopped & the participants were given 2 further tasks (this was to measure their tolerance for frustration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Glass & Singer: What did the results show?

A

That unpredictability and perceived control had a greater effect than volume/loudness on task performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: What did this experiment investigate?

A

How drivers responded in different temperatures when they were trapped behind a stationary car.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: What was the temperature range?

A

31-46°C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: Where did this experiment take place?

A

Arizona.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: Describe the method used for this experiment.

A

A confederate positioned themselves at some traffic lights in their car and remained stationary throughout the 12 seconds the lights were on green. The participant was the person directly behind them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: What did the observer do and where were they positioned?

A

An observer who was hidden counted the number & duration of horn honks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: Results: What was the correlation made regarding temperature?

A

Higher temperatures were positively correlated with increased
likelihood of honking & amount of time leaning on the horn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Kenrick & MacFarlane: What does this experiment provide evidence for?

A

This provides evidence that temperature can be an environmental stressor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Lundberg: What was the independent variable for this experiment?

A

Low/high density of train and where the passengers got on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Lundberg: What was the dependent variable for this experiment?

A

Adrenaline levels in the passengers’ urine and self-ratings of discomfort and perceived crowdedness.

17
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Lundberg: Explain the results of this experiment.

A

Adrenaline is higher during more crowded conditions, but lower for those who got on at the first stop.

18
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Lundberg: What was the conclusion of this experiment?

A

length of train journey is not a main indicator of stress, but rather social factors crowding, and level of control.

19
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Lundberg: Describe the participants for this experiment.

A

All male.

20
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Ellis: What is Rational Emotive Therapy (RET)?

A

RET is an active form of psychotherapy that helps clients manage self-defeating beliefs and develop more rational thoughts.

21
Q

(Topic 1: Additional Studies) Ellis: Describe the process of RET.

A

A – Activating event (the stressor)
B – Beliefs (about the stressor)
C – Consequences – (the actions to avoid stressor)
In therapy, the aim is to add D and E to this:
D – Disputing (questioning the irrational beliefs)
E – Effects (restructured thoughts hopefully helping the
person to cope with the stressor in future)