Topic 1 - definitions and models Flashcards

1
Q

Stimulus based definition

A

• X situation causes stress

If we use stimulus-based, we end up with a huge list, because what is stressful to me might not be stressful to you. –> too unspecific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Response based

A

• We know that X is stressful because it causes Y response

Response-based: if we don’t identify the STIMULUS that is stressful, does that mean that stimulus is not stressfull? Not really? –> too specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Circularity problem in defintion of stress

A

Essentially, when we use a stimulus-based definition, we end up looking at responses anyway, and vice versa = circularity

Circularity issue: looking at either of the based definitions:
Stim-based: exams are stressful = not true for all
Resp-based: exams stressful because heart rate goes up (but this is not true for everyone)
–> exams can both be stressful and not, depending on definition!
–> we go back and forth between definitions to identify what things are actually stressful. –> Circularity!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Process focused definition

A

Lazarus: we need to consider cognitive appraisal and coping in how exposure to events lead to certain responses and account for individual differences. –> it’s not a “simple” cause/reaction relationship!

What we DO know: role of cognition is central, and fills most of the research, field is cognitively driven. –> many treatments are CBT based. Cognitively driven interventions dominate.

  • Stress as a process is the dominate view
  • In this process; external and internal stimuli/forces/systems interact where triggers activate a response system that may lead to exhaustion and vulnerability (Wheaton 1994)
  • Stress responses can occur at behavioral, cognitive and physiological levels

as “a process in which environmental demands tax or exceed the adaptive capacity of an organism, resulting in psychological and biological changes that may place persons at risk for disease” (Cohen, Kessler, & Gordon, 1997, p. 3, emphasis in original).
Important factor included in this definition:
• inclusion of environmental, psychological, and biological phenomena, which incorporates three distinct traditions.
• Focus on process, which contrasts with some earlier views in which stress is a more static construct, referring, for example, to a stimulus or a response.
• The idea of an imbalance between environmental demands and adaptive capacity, suggests a person–situation interaction that causes a departure from homeostasis and activates compensatory psychological and biological activity.
• recognizes that much interest in stress among scientists and lay persons alike lies in its potential role in the development and control of health problems, particularly those involving physical disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General adaption syndrome

A

Selye (1956)
• General Adaptation Syndrome

• Step 1: Appearance of a challenge (fight/flight)

• Step 2: Activation of coping abilities - After the initial shock of a stressful event and having a fight-or-flight response, the body begins to repair itself. It releases a lower amount of cortisol, and your heart rate and blood pressure begin to normalize.
Some stressful situations continue for extended periods of time. If you don’t resolve the stress and your body remains on high alert, it eventually adapts and learns how to live with a higher stress level

• Step 3: Prolonged exposure, potentially exhaustion
At this stage, the person is no longer able to adapt to the stressor: the body’s ability to resist becomes depleted as physical wear takes its toll on the body’s tissues and organs. As a result, illness, disease, and other permanent damage to the body

Definition: The general adaptation syndrome (GAS) is a theory of stress responding proposed by Hans Selye. It refers to the nonspecific, generalized responses of the body in response to stress and provides a framework for the link between stress and chronic illness (Selye, 1956).

Selye = continuation of Cannon earlier work. (Cannon articulated the fight-flight response )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Activation/Exhaustion Model

A

Selye (1976)

Stimulus –> activation –> EITHER adaption OR exhaustion

MOST SIMPLE LEVEL MODEL

The model assumed the activation was universal for everyone.
The model has gone through changes over time including e.g. Genetics in individual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stress Diathesis Model

A

Levi (1972) (see notes for actual model)

• Main point: The response is modulated by the person, and every person has a different reaction to a stressor, also dependent on the environment

Environment affects both the stressor and the person
The person and the stressor in turn affect the stress.
The stress then affects psychological and physical stress.

THIS IS AN INTERACTIONAL MODEL - DOES NOT INCOORPORATE FEEDBACK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4-way division of stress models

A

Feuerstein, Labbe, Kuczmierczyk (1976)

  1. Response-based models (ex. Selye’s)
  2. Stimulus-based models
  3. Interactional models (ex. Levi’s)
  4. Information Processing models

Different types of models
Response- don’t account for individual differences in responses. – from earlier slide:

Response based definition
• We know that X is stressful because it causes Y response

Stimulus-based: limited in that we don’t know exactly what one person will find stressful.

Stimulus based definition
• X situation causes stress

Interactional: stressful response is dependent on the stressor and the context.

Info-process: these models are complex, look at interactions and stress as a whole (an aggregate of a sitution) involving recognition of a stress, and the evaluation of the stress (meaning and impact), this impact the amount of attention you give to the stress, and affects the way of coping you do. It also depends on previous experiences with the stressor, if it was stressful then.

Take away: stress is much more complictaed than the original models, and made it possible to incoorporate the learning that occurs underway. (first year exam –> super stressful –> but you learn to cope with it –> you evaluate it as less stressful)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hamilton (1980) - info processing model example

A
  • Looks at the whole
  • Stressor recognition
  • Stressor evaluation
  • Meaning of the stressor
  • Amount of attention allocated
  • Recollection of past effective and non-effective coping experiences

importan point:
Recollection: maybe exams went well in past –> “maybe it’s stressful, but I can do it!” –> less stressful response. (accounts for “feedback” of information)
= includes updating information, a feedback loop!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Allostasis

A

“stability through change” = person is faced with stressors and challenges all the time, need to adapt to new circumstances, rather han return to original state, in order to ensure homeostasis = this process is called allostasis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Allostatic (over)load

A

The definition of allostatic overload (AO) refers to the chronic, cumulative effect of stressful situations in daily life experienced by the individual as taxing or exceeding his or her coping skills.

Types of allostatic load include (1) frequent activation of allostatic systems; (2) failure to shut off allostatic activity after stress; (3) inadequate response of allostatic systems leading to elevated activity of other, normally counter-regulated allostatic systems after stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

McEwens 4 situations of allostatic overload:

A

Repeated hits:
repeated exposure to a stressor with no time in between to recover.
Example: In ER, people are constantly hit with high-impact, stressing trauma patients, with no time to recover to a state of prior functioning, nor adjust to the situation.
–> allostatic overload because no time to get better

Lack of adaption model:
Example: living in Chicago on a main road, always sirens going by - over time, adapted to sirens, could sleep through them.
Allostatic overlad: every time they hear sirens they wake up = black lines.

Third occurence of allostatic overload: prolonged stressor
Prolonged stressor, one long line instead of “mountain tops” = failure to recover - kinda situation. Something we see in PTSD or major anxiety disorders. Lack of recovery from stressor. (will not ask specific question about that on exam)

The fourth one is super complex.
Basically the different models interacting with each other, turning each other on and off. Beyond the relevance for this course.
–> looking at interactions of systems in body, co-activating each other, and they are not able to shut off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lack of adaption model:

A

Example: living in Chicago on a main road, always sirens going by - over time, adapted to sirens, could sleep through them.
Allostatic overlad: every time they hear sirens they wake up = black lines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Repeated hits:

A

Example: In ER, people are constantly hit with high-impact, stressing trauma patients, with no time to recover to a state of prior functioning, nor adjust to the situation.
–> allostatic overload because no time to get better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Eustress

A
  • Pleasurable, satisfying experiences that are also associated with increased stress responses (e.g. giving birth)
  • Stress can be motivating and helpful
  • Can push us to exercise
  • To tackle a problem
  • To develop skills
  • To work hard

Stress = not always bad thing –> differentiating between STRESS and potential/resulting DISTRESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CHALLENGES IN STUDYING STRESS

A

What is stressful for one person, may not be stressful to another.
Contemporary research has three main things (points?): (didn’t catch this)
• Stress = Situation that evokes a stress response.
• Stress = subjective response, more internal
• Stress = body’s physiological reaction to a demand/event.

We need to think of stress, and the challenges in the field, in a continuum (stress can affect social consequences, eating habits, disease, etc)

17
Q

Coping (definition)

A

Efforts to deal with a threatening or harmful situation either to remove the threat or to diminish the ways in which it can have an adverse impact on the person (Carver, 2011).

18
Q

Emotion Focused Coping

A

• Lazarus and Folkman (1984)
Emotion-focused = aimed at preventing, minimizing or reducing distress associated with stressful circumstances (exercising, alcohol, medidation, distraction, suppresion, etc)

Controllability of stressor often affects with coping approach people use. If controllable: more proactive appraoch, if not –> emotional approach. BUT people have individual tendencies/preferences for what they tend to do to cope. –> especially relevant in resiliency!

Problem-solving coping can lead to emotion-focused coping (if you’re done handling, you emotionally cope), or emotional coping may lead to problem-focused. (you have processed your emotions, now you’re ready to act)

19
Q

Problem Focused Coping

A

• Lazarus and Folkman (1984)
Problem-focused = aimed towards the stressor (e.g. Study for an exam, practicing for a competition, leaving a stressful job/relationship) = using your problem-solving skills, or seeking advice, towards solving the stressful problem

Controllability of stressor often affects with coping approach people use. If controllable: more proactive appraoch, if not –> emotional approach. BUT people have individual tendencies/preferences for what they tend to do to cope. –> especially relevant in resiliency!

Problem-solving coping can lead to emotion-focused coping (if you’re done handling, you emotionally cope), or emotional coping may lead to problem-focused. (you have processed your emotions, now you’re ready to act)

20
Q

Approach coping:

A

efforts to directly deal with stressors or emotions evoked.

both actively handling problem and actively diminishing your emotions.

21
Q

Avoidance coping

A

attempts to escape from having to deal with a stressor

attempt to escape emotional stress (e.g. “wishful thinking”) –> can be useful on short-term, you can let emotions out, and then afterwards be more effective –> but not good on long-term (e.g. Denying presence of stressor (immediately good, gives some “overskud”, but in long run leads to problems like psychological distress, physical illness)

22
Q

Positive Meaning-Focused and Spiritual Coping

A

Positive meaning focused coping: trying to cope with adversity by finding experiences that induce positive emotions

Maybe eating food that tastes good, “releasing” positive emotions?
Maybe watching comforting TV inducing a happy state.
Also finding meaning within a stressor:

This aspect goes a bit into emotional-coping, but more than just coping with the emotional experience - you’re recognizing and using the emotion, but one step further is that you’re trying to find meaning in it, finding a silver lining!

23
Q

Problem of fuzziness (definition)

A

A certain amount of imprecision is to be expected in defining constructs, especially when they represent complex social, psychological, and biological phenomena.
Formulations that avoid the limitations of stimulus- and response-focused approaches, by defining stress in terms of processes (i.e., whereby certain kinds of stimuli lead to certain kinds of responses), will leave something to be desired as regards precision and specificity, until those processes are clearly and thoroughly characterized.
Lazarus (1984) argued that the concepts of cognitive appraisal and coping are required in order to explain how exposure to certain kinds of hard to say where the cognitive–evaluative (appraisal) process that initiates stress terminates, and where the coping activity whereby the person manages the perceived stressor and its effects begins. The concepts are fuzzy and overlapping.

24
Q

Problem of Probabilistic Causation (in definitions)

A

Kinda like every event has some probability of causing stress, depending on the context and individual (and incoorporating these factors has improved precision of prediction).

It has been suggested that definitional problems with the
stress concept have contributed to its inability to provide
a basis for acquiring adequate empirical support for a priori
statements as to what kinds of stimuli will provoke
stress responses and which bodily systems will respond
(e.g., Engel, 1998). However, this criticism may be countered,
as it is in many areas of inquiry, by recognizing that
elements of the processes involved in stress show probabilistic,
rather than deterministic causal relationships with
one another.

Research in the field incoorporates additional constructs to improve precision.
stressors are not inherently stressful, they are events and conditions that
are potentially stressful (i.e., that may produce predicted
responses) depending upon cognitive appraisal and coping
processes. The outcomes of those appraisal and coping
processes, in turn, depend upon personal attributes
and social–contextual factors that operate as resources or
vulnerabilities, either dampening or amplifying the stress
response (at least in part) through their effects on appraisal and coping.
–> understanding/inccorporating other factors has increased precision in predictions of occurence and outcomes of stress.