Tolman: There Is More Than One Kind of Learning Flashcards
Overview
*Tolman emphasizes the importance of bringing together theoretical, learning, and clinical psychologists
There are six kinds of learning:
cathexes, equivalence beliefs, field expectations, field-cognition modes, drive discriminations, motor patterns
There is a lack of empirical evidence for acquisition, de-acquisition, and forgetting
Cathexes
Attachments of specific types goal-object [or negative “disturbance-object”] to basic drives
Positive cathexis – attachment of a type of positive goal to a positive drive
Acquisition
Occurs through trying out objects in finding out whether or not they work to reduce the corresponding drive – this is reinforcement
Tolman agrees with Hull in the efficacy of need-reduction, however, there is no experimental evidence to prove this
De-acquisition
Failure of reinforcement that weakens cathexis
Negative Cathexis
Attachment of a type of disturbance-object to a negative drive
Acquisition occurs through negative reinforcement
De-acquisition through ERP
Equivalence beliefs
Connection between a cathected goal type to a subgoal
Field Expectations
“sign-gestalt-expectations”
Gestalt principles of learning and forgetting [not associationistic principles], are of prime importance in the acquiring and forgetting the field expectancies
When an organism is repeatedly presented on successive occasions with an environmental setup, it acquires an apprehension of not only each group of immediate stimuli, but also a “set”
When the organism comes into contact with the first group of stimuli, it is prepared for the stimuli to come
These sets make latent learning possible
and for organisms to make shortcuts
e.g. cognitive maps
Field-Cognition Modes
Innate modes or manners of functioning of perception, memory, and inference
Important for field expectancies
Though innate, experience also contributes
Drive Discriminations
rats can learn to discriminate thirst from hunger
However, there is no data on how we learn, unlearn, or forget drive discriminations
Motor Patterns
Motor patterns are acquired through simple conditioning, without reinforcement [He agrees with Guthrie on this point]
However, learning of motor patterns is a necessity for larger goal-directed activity
This is something Guthrie didn’t emphasize
For Tolman, cats learn “stereotype” behaviors because of their larger goal of getting out of the box
Summary
Reinforcement is probably valid for the acquisition of cathexes and equivalence beliefs
Reinforcement per se is not valid for the acquisition of field expectancies
Gestalt principles of learning and forgetting [not associationist principles], are of prime importance in the acquiring and forgetting the field expectancies
No laws available yet for the acquisition, de-acquisition and forgetting of the field-cognition modes of perception, memory, and inference
No laws for drive discriminations
Motor patterns are acquired through simple conditioning