Mawhiney & Mawhiney: Operant Terms and Concepts Applied to Industry Flashcards
Reinforcement Schedules
The presumption is that one can accurately isolate what are reinforcers and punishers that can be made contingent upon a response by a schedule
Psychologists have exhibited some difficulty with the task of accurately identifying and defining reinforcers in both theoretical discussions and field tests of operant principles of reinforcement
Reinforcement
The term reinforcement always refers to increasing (or maintaining) the strength or rate of response by manipulation of its consequences
Reinforcement of a response involves altering the environment in which behavior occurs – “stimulus consequences”
Positive reinforcement
Reinforcement effected by contingent presentation of the stimulus consequence
The stimulus consequence is called a Positive Reinforcer
Negative Reinforcement
Reinforcement effected by contingent removal of a stimulus as a stimulus consequence
The removal is called a Negative Reinforcer
Punishment
The reduction of response rate by contingent presentations of aversive consequences or removal of appetitive consequences
Extinction
The discontinuance of a contingency following a conditioning procedure
Premack
A positive reinforcer in one circumstance can be made to function as a positive punisher in another circumstance
The controlling factor is relative deprivation/satiation for the stimulus consequence
Topography
Characteristics of the response, not just the response itself
The term “operant response” is typically used to refer to the effect of a response upon its environment – without reference to topography
To say the lever’s press says nothing about the pattern of movements, or the force that is exerted in achieving the response
Purposive Behavior
the purpose of behavior is its historic consequences
This is the basic subject matter of operant psychology
The operant paradigm represents an attempt to describe the determinants of purposive behavior from the point of view of an objective third person observer
Misconceptions/misapplications by I/O Psych
Overapplication of operant concepts
Use of cognitions and intentions
Omission of reinforcement histories – they only consider responses and schedules of reinforcement
I.e. they only look at two-term operant contingencies, and neglect the history and antecedent
2-term contingencies don’t allow understanding of purposiveness or intent
Social situations yield compliance with contingencies, but do not necessarily yield satisfaction
Antecedent Stimuli
Environment in which a response occurs
Stimulus Consequences
Reinforcement or punishment
Changes response rate or strength of response by contingent presentation or withdrawal of consequences
Two ways to define “purposive” behavior
- Implication of future tense – goal theory
- Descriptive – state the present behavior and conjoin it with what happened in the past – Operant Theory
* *only definition appropriate for scientific analysis