Title V - Possession Flashcards
Art. 523. Possession is the […].
Art. 523. Possession is the holding of a ting or the enjoyment of a right.
What is the concept of possession according to De Leon?
Possession is the holding of a thing or the enjoyment of a right with the intention to possess in one’s own right.
What is the difference between ownership and possession?
There is ownership when a thing pertaining to one person is completely subjected to the will in a manner not prohibited by law and consistent with the rights of others. Ownership confers certain right to the owner, among which are the right to enjoy the thing owned and the right to exclude other persons from possession thereof.
On the other hand, possession is defined as the holding of a thing or the enjoyment of a right. Literally, to possess means to actually and physically occupy a thing with or without a right.
What are the two ways in which a person may have possession of a thing?
Possession in the concept of an owner, and possession of a holder.
What are the elements of possession?
- There must be holding or control of a thing or right;
- The holding or control must be with intention to possess;
- It must be in one’s own right.
What are the relations created by possession?
- Possessor’s relation to the property itself – assumes that the possessor exercises some degree of control more or less effective over the object;
- Possessor’s relation to the world – possessor must also have the ability to exclude others from his possession.
What are the forms or degrees of possession?
- Possession without any title whatever – mere holding without any right or title at all;
- Possession with a juridical title – possession is predicated on a juridical relation existing between the possessor and the owner;
- Possession with a just title – possession of an adverse claimant whose title is sufficient to transfer ownership but is defective (ie. the seller is not the true owner but the possessor acted in good faith);
- Possession with a title fee simple – possession derived from the right of dominion or possession of an owner. This is the highest degree of possession.
What are the classes of possession?
- Possession in one’s own name or in the name of another (Art. 524);
- Possession in the concept of owner or possession in the concept of holder (Art. 525); and
- Possession in good faith or possession in bad faith (Art. 526);
Art. 524. Possession may be exercised in […].
Art. 524. Possession may be exercised in one’s own name or in that of another.
Art. 525. The possession of things or rights may be had in one of two concepts: either in […], or in that of the […], the ownership pertaining to another person.
Art. 525. The possession of things or rights may be had in one of two concepts: either in the concept of owner, or in that of the holder of the thing or right to keep or enjoy it, the ownership pertaining to another person.
Art. 526. He is deemed a possessor in good faith who is […].
He is deemed possessor in bad faith who possesses in any case […].
[…] may be the basis of good faith.
Art. 526. He is deemed a possessor in good faith who is not aware that there exists in his title or mode of acquisition any flaw which invalidates it.
He is deemed possessor in bad faith who possesses in any case contrary to the foregoing.
Mistake upon a doubtful or difficult question of law may be the basis of good faith.
Requisites for possession in good faith or in bad faith.
- The possessor has a title or mode of acquisition;
- There is a flaw or defect in said title or mode; and
- The possessor is unaware or aware of the flaw or defect or believes that the thing belongs or does not belong to him.
Art. 527. Good faith is […], and upon him who alleged bad faith on the part of a possessor […].
Art. 527. Good faith is always presumed, and upon him who alleged bad faith on the part of a possessor rests the burden of proof.
Art. 528. Possession acquired in good faith does not lose this character except in the case and from […].
Art. 528. Possession acquired in good faith does not lose this character except in the case and from the moment facts exist which show that the possessor is not unaware that he possesses the thing improperly or wrongfully.
Art. 529. It is presumed that possession continues to be […], until the contrary is proven.
Art. 529. It is presumed that possession continues to be enjoyed in the same character in which it was acquired, until the contrary is proven.
Art. 530. Only things and rights which are […] may be the object of possession.
Art. 530. Only things and rights which are susceptible of being appropriated may be the object of possession.
What is the difference between jus possidendi and jus possessionis?
jus possidendi - the right to possession which is incidental to and included in the right of ownership;
jus possessionis - the right of possession which is independent of and apart from the right ownership.
What are the benefits to the possessor in fact?
The fact of possession gives rise to certain rights and presumptions. Thus, a possessor has a right to be respected in his possession, and should he be disturbed therein, he shall be protected in or restored to said possession. A possessor has in his favor the presumption that his possession is lawful – that he is the owner or has been given the right of possession by the owner. He who would disturb a possessor must show either ownership or a better possessory right. [De Leon]
Is possession a definitive proof of ownership?
No. Possession is not a definitive proof of ownership nor is non-possession inconsistent therewith. Possession, however, may create ownership either by occupation or by acquisitive prescription.
What is actual possession?
Actual possession is occupancy in fact of the whole or at least substantially the whole. With reference to land, it consists in the manifestation of acts of dominion over it of such a nature as a party would naturally exercise over his property. Literally this means to actually and physically occupy a thing with or without a right.
What is constructive possession?
Constructive possession, on the other hand, is occupancy of part in the name of the whole under such circumstances that the law extends the occupancy to the possession of the whole.
How may possession be exercised?
Art. 524. Possession may be exercised in one’s own name or in that of another.
Differentiate voluntary possession in the name of another and necessary possession in the name of another.
There is voluntary possession in the name of another when the possession is exercised by virtue of an agreement while there is necessary or legal possession in the name of another when the possession is exercised by virtue of law; such as the possession in behalf of incapacitated persons and juridical entities.
What is the legal effect of unauthorized voluntary possession by a third persons in the name of another?
The legal effect of unauthorized voluntary possession by a third persons in the name of another is that it shall not be effective unless it is ratified.
Differentiate physical or material possession from juridical possession.
There is physical or material possession when the possessor is a mere custodian or keeper of the property or funds received and has no independent right or title to retain or possess the same as against the owner, such as the possession of money received by a teller for the bank.
There is juridical possession when the possession gives the transferee a right over the thing which the transferee may set up against the owner, such as the possession of an agent who receives the proceeds of sales of goods delivered to him in agency by his principal.
What are the two concepts in which possession of things or rights may be had?
Art. 525. The possession of things or rights may be had in one of two concepts: either in the concept of owner, or in that of the holder of the thing or right to keep or enjoy it, the ownership pertaining to another person.
When is a possessor deemed as a possessor in good faith?
According to paragraph 1 of Art. 526, “He is deemed a possessor in good faith who is not aware that there exists in his title or mode of acquisition any flaw which invalidates it.”
When is a possessor deemed as a possessor in bad faith?
According to paragraph 2 of Art. 526, “He is deemed a possessor in bad faith who possessing any case contrary to the foregoing.” (i.e. he is aware that there exists in his title or mode of acquisition a flaw which invalidates it.)
Is ignorance of the law a basis for good faith?
Manresa is of the opinion that gross and inexcusable ignorance of the law may not be the basis of good faith but excusable ignorance may be such basis if it is based upon ignorance of a fact.