Time Limits Flashcards
Application to appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court
Must be made no more than 28 days after the decision date. (can be either prosecution or defence if it involves a point of LAW only).
Time Limit for trying an accused in the Magistrates Court (summary offence)
A magistrates’ court may not try an accused for a summary offence unless the application for a summons was served on the magistrates’ court within six months of the time when the offence was allegedly committed. (does not apply to either-way or indictable offences)
Time limit for the prosecution issuing the written charge and requisition process.
where a prosecution is initiated by the written charge and requisition process, the written charge must be issued within the six months permitted by s. 127. For these purposes, ‘the written charge can be regarded as issued only when the document comprising the written charge is completed, with all relevant details and in the form needed for service. Provided that is done within six months of the relevant offence, the written charge will have been issued in time’
What is the procedure if there is uncertainty as to whether proceedings were started in time?
where there is uncertainty as to whether proceedings were started in time, the question should be determined according to the criminal standard of proof and the magistrates should decline to hear the matter unless satisfied so that they are sure that the proceedings were commenced within the statutory time-limit.
Time limit for bringing charges of an either-way offence
As regards either-way offences, there is no time-limit within which proceedings must be started, unless it is one of the exceptional offences for which there is statutory limitation on the time for taking proceedings on indictment, in which case that limitation applies equally to summary proceedings (s. 127(2) and (4)).
Even where a statute creates an either-way offence and then appears to impose a time-limit in respect of summary proceedings (but not proceedings on indictment), the limitation is overridden by the MCA 1980, s. 127(2).
Time limit for disclosure of unused material in the Crown Court
There are no statutory time-limits for disclosure of unused material in the Crown Court. That being the case, the default position is set out in the CPIA 1996, s. 13(1): disclosure must be made as soon as reasonably practicable after the happening of a particular event, such as service of the prosecution case.
When must a notice of intention to call a witness be given?
Notice of intention to call a witness must be given within 14 days from the date when the prosecutor complies, or purports to comply, with his duty to disclose under s. 3
When must a defence statement be served?
The defence statement must be served within 28 days of the prosecution’s compliance (or purported compliance) with the duty of initial disclosure. There is no limit to the number of applications that may be made (reg. 3). Time runs from the date of service of a statement by the prosecution under the CPIA 1996, s. 3(1)(h), not from service of the scheduled unused material
When does the “relevant period” begin?
begins with the day on which the prosecutor complies, or purports to comply, with section 3 (initial duty of prosecutor to disclose).
How long is the relevant period for disclosure in summary trials?
14 days, beginning with the first day of the relevant period
How long is the relevant period for disclosure in crown court trials?
28 days, beginning with the first day of the relevant period
Is there a limit to how many applications can be made to extend the relevant period?
No
What failures to comply with defence disclosure will the court award sanctions for under s11 CIPA?
Section 11 CIPA
sanctions for failure in defence disclosure which apply if the accused:
a. fails to give the initial defence statement required under s. 5 in respect of Crown Court cases;
b. gives the initial defence statement after the 14-day period during which it must be served in the magistrates’ court or after the 28-day period during which it must be served in the Crown Court (see D9.40);
c. fails to provide an updated statement required under s.6B(1) or a statement that no updating is necessary under s.6B(4) (note, however, that s. 6B is not yet in force);
d. supplies the documents in (c) outside the applicable time-limit;
e. sets out inconsistent defences in the defence statement;
f. puts forward a defence at trial that was not mentioned in the defence statement;
g. relies on a matter that should have been mentioned in the defence statement to comply with s. 6A, but was not;
h. gives evidence of alibi or call a witness to give evidence in support of alibi without having complied with the provisions relating to notification of alibi witnesses;
i. calls a witness not included or adequately identified in the notice of defence witnesses.
The above list is a summary of s.11(2)
Can the prosecution or co-accused comment on defects in disclosure?
Other parties (the prosecution and co-accused) may also comment upon any defect in disclosure, but in certain circumstances such comment requires the leave of the court. Those circumstances are where the defect that triggers the sanction is a failure to mention a point of law (including failure to mention a point about admissibility of evidence or abuse of process) or authority to be relied on, failure to give notice of or adequately identify a witness, or failure to give such notice in time (s.11(6) and (7)).
Can the jury draw inferences from failure to comply with s11 (Defence disclosure)
If any of the above deficiencies applies, the court or jury may also draw such inferences as appear proper in deciding whether the accused is guilty of the offence concerned (s. 11(5)(b)). The accused may not, however, be convicted solely on the basis of such an inference (s. 11(10)).
If there is a failure of defence disclosure by breaching the requirements of the CPIA, what sanctions are the court limited to?
If there is a failure of defence disclosure by breaching any of the requirements of the CPIA 1996, the only sanctions available to the court are those contained in s. 11. Therefore, the court cannot:
• punish by way of contempt of court a failure to comply with its direction to amend (or provide) the defence statement (Rochford [2010] EWCA Crim 1928, [2011] 1 WLR 534);
• rule as inadmissible the evidence of alibi witnesses on the basis that no defence statement had been served providing details of them (R (Tinnion) v Reading Crown Court [2009] EWHC 2930 (Admin), [2010] RTR 24 (263)); and
• decline to allow the accused to put forward matters in cross-examination which go to a relevant issue because the material on which such cross-examination is based is produced at a very late stage with no advance notice (T [2012] EWCA Crim 2358).
Time allowed for deferring sentencing
The court must fix the date to which sentence is deferred, the maximum period allowed being six months (s. 1(4)). Subject to an exception mentioned below, sentence may be deferred only once (s. 1(4)). (once per court – e.g. can be deferred in the Mags and then committed to crown and deferred again.)
Maximum time the magistrates may adjourn after conviction, before sentencing
The adjournment shall not be for more than four weeks at a time unless the court remands the accused in custody and, where it so remands him, the adjournment shall not be for more than three weeks at a time. The court may, if necessary adjourn again.
Maximum Sentence a Magistrate can impose
The maximum sentence that magistrates may currently impose upon an offender summarily convicted of an either-way offence, is six months’ imprisonment and/or a fine of any amount
Maximum time for a conditional discharge
The period of the conditional discharge is fixed by the court but must not exceed three years.
What is considered the “reasonable amount of time” for the repayment of fines?
The Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines state that ‘normally a fine should be of an amount that is capable of being paid within 12 months’, however, it was held by the Court of Appeal that the maximum time is not limited to 12 months.
There is an exception in relation to corporate defendants, where the fine may be payable over a substantially longer period than for an individual.
What is the time limit on completing an unpaid work element?
The number of hours of unpaid work which may be ordered by the court, must be not less than 40 and not more than. The work required should normally be completed within 12 months (s. 200(2)).
What are the limits on the number of hours available to the court to impose a curfew (per day)
A curfew requirement is a requirement that the offender remain at a place specified by the court for certain periods of time. These periods of time must be not less than two hours and not more than 16 hours in any given day.
What is the longest a curfew period can be implemented?
12 months
How long can the court delay imposing a confiscation order?
The confiscation order may be made before sentence. Alternatively, the court may postpone the confiscation hearing for up to two years from the date of conviction and proceed first to sentence the defendant, but must not impose any financial orders or penalties in that period, such as a compensation order or fine. In ‘exceptional circumstances’ longer postponements are possible.
Can a justices’ clerk issue a warrant?
No. A justices’ clerk may issue a summons but not a warrant.
How does a prosecutor apply for a summons?
Under CrimPR 7.2(1) a prosecutor who wants the court to issue a summons must either serve a written application on the court, or present an application orally to the court (but with a written record of the allegation(s) made by the prosecutor). By virtue of CrimPR 7.2(3), the application must set out the allegation(s) made by the applicant and, if there is a time limit for prosecution of the offence(s), demonstrate that the application is made in time.
How long can the Magistrates remand an accused in custody?
The maximum period for which a magistrates’ court may remand an accused in custody is ‘eight clear days’
Can Magistrates award further remands?
Yes. A person who is brought before the court after an earlier remand may be remanded again. The only limitation on the number of remands is the general discretion of magistrates to refuse an adjournment if it would be against the interests of justice.
Can the ‘eight clear days’ be extended in one period of remand?
Yes. the accused may be remanded for a period greater than eight clear days if the remand is on bail and both the accused and the prosecution agree to a longer period of remand.
Time Limit between:
first appearance and committal
the maximum period for which an accused charged with an indictable offence may be held in the custody of the magistrates’ court between first appearance and committal proceedings is 70 days.
Time Limit between:
first appearance and summary trial
If the offence is triable either way and the court determines to try the case summarily, the maximum period in custody between first appearance and the court beginning to hear evidence for the prosecution is again 70 days, unless the decision for summary trial is taken within 56 days, in which case the limit is reduced to 56 days