Tillich's View Of Religious Language As Entirely Symbolic Flashcards
Within theology, Tillich is probably best known for his “? of ?” (“correlation” meaning a mutual relationship between two or more things), with an aim to correlate faith and ?
Theology.
Correlation.
Culture.
Tillich was a German-American theologian who was part of a movement working to show Christianity as relevant for people living in a ?-? ?
Post-war society.
Tillich believed all religious language is ? rather than literal, and can’t be ? to tests in order to assess its meaningfulness.
Symbolic.
Subjected.
He argued that symbols can take us beyond the world available to our sense into the “? ?” of the symbol.
Internal reality.
Tillich made a distinction between signs and ?, arguing that signs are chosen arbitrarily to stand for something else and a symbol “? in” the object represented.
Symbols.
Participates.
All of our most important ideas, concerns, feelings and experiences are expressed through ?
Symbols.
Following Aquinas, ? claimed that to use literal language of God’s unhelpful and conveys a false impression of the nature of ?
Tillich.
God.
Tillich understood God to be Being-Itself, sometimes expressed as “? ? ? ? ?”. When understanding this, we have a solid response to the ultimate ? question.
The ground of all being.
Existential.