The Cataphatic Way, Or Via Positiva, As A Way Of Speaking About God Flashcards

1
Q

Aquinas used the term via eminentiae (the way of ?) to show that what we say ,and know, of God is only ?

A

Eminence.

Partial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Summa Theologica, Aquinas suggested there could be a way of making positive claims about God as long as we understand the words we use have an ? application.

A

Analogical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The most famous analogy in the Christian philosophy of religion is ? watchmaker, where he claims God’s design of the world’s ? to a watchmaker’s design of a watch.

A

Paley’s.

Analogous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Univocal means the same words are used in the same way (? mat and ?).

A

Bath.

Doormat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Equivocal means the same word is used in two different ways (? bat and ? bat).

A

Fruit.

Cricket.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

We use words in a way that’s ?, meaning that the same term is used, in not the same sense, but in a similar or related ? (? blanket and blanket of ?).

A

Analogical.
Sense.
Woollen.
Snow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Aquinas rejected using ? language to speak of God because it makes God too small and doesn’t sufficiently convey the greatness and mystery of God.

A

Univocal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aquinas divided ? into two main types:

  • Analogy of attribution, where there’s a ? relationship between the two things described. When we speak of God as loving, we should think about the casual ? here and realise that God doesn’t only display love but is the cause of all love.
  • Analogy of proportionality, where the words relate to objects that are different in ? In religious terms, Aquinas thought that we can use terms such as “loving” and “faithful” when we speak of God, but we have to recognise these are on an ? vaster scale than our own.
A
Analogies.
Casual.
Relationship.
Proportion.
Infinitely.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly