Tier 1 And 2 Weight Management Flashcards
Obesity statistics in the UK: overall prevalence, prevalence in children, prevalence of overweight and obesity in men and women
- overall: 26.2% obesity
- children: 28% overweight or obese p
- 41.2% of men are overweight, 31.3% of women are overweight
- 7/10 men are overweight or obese, compared to 6/10 women
Waist circumference and CVD risk
- moderate risk: high SC fat around the midline
- high risk: high visceral fat around the midline
- why BIA and waist circumference measures need to be used in addition to BMI
- visceral adipose tissue correlates well with measures of waist circumference
- the greater the waist circumference the greater the risk of metabolic disease
- WHO cut-offs are 80cm for women and 94cm for men
Meta-inflammation and ichemia in obese adipocytes
- blood supply doesnt match adipose expansion in obese people and tissue becomes hypoxic, leading to inflammatory cytokine/adipokine release, immune cell infiltration, insulin resistance, inflammation
- can lead to lipid accumulation and insulin resistance in the liver and the muscle
Risk factors for obesity
- lower socioeconomic class
- having genetic variants which predispose to obesity in environment with high food provision
Benefits of 10 kg weight loss
- 20-25% reduction in total mortality
- 30-40% reduction in deaths related to diabetes
- 40-50% reduction in obesity-related cancer deaths
- 10 mmHg reduction in DBP and SBP
- diabetes: 30-50% reduction in fasting glucose, 15% reduction in HbA1c
- 10% reduction in overall cholesterol, 15% reduction in LDL, 30% reduction in TG, 8% increase in HDL
- improved ovarian function, lung function, insulin sensitivity
- improved sleep apnoea, joint pain, reduced back pain
Tier 1 weight management
- preventative strategies from a public health perspective to prevent obesity
- more so for those with a BMI of <25
- prevention and reinforcement of healthy eating and PA messages
- environmental and population-wide services and initiatives
- includes national campaigns
- CCGs are responsible for provision of community-based interventions which encourage healthy eating and PA
- self-directed weight management has been found to have minimal impact at 12 months, interactive programs may be more beneficial at managing weight
- public acceptability was greater for the least intrusive interventions i.e provision of information and services, but most effective were interventions which eliminated/restricted choice
Tier 2 weight management
- for people with a BMI of 25-30
- assessed at GP and referred to multi-component weight management services
- i.e weight watchers or slimming world or digital interventions (encouraging diet, PA, self-regulation and CBT techniques)
- aim for 3% weight loss at 3 months, 5-10% at 6 months
- maintenance at 12 months
- local CCGs are responsible for commissioning of weight management services
- seem to be effective in the short term, but weight loss often not retained
- but commercial open-group programs are more effective that SoC
- referral for 52 weeks achieves greater weight loss than standard 12 week interventions, extended referral improves fasting glucose
Obesity prevention strategies (agentic, agento-structural, structural, micro, macro)
- agentic: individuals required to make independent choices
- agento-structural: structural changes to facilitate healthier choices
- structural: structural arrangements altered to the extent that individual choice in a given context is removed
- micro: schools, work, clinical, home
- macro: national, state or community level
Critical features of successful tier 2 interventions
1) supportive relationships between service users and providers
2) self-regulation and maintenance of a healthy weight depend on individual own ability of engage in activities such as exercise
3) relationships are an essential first step in a weight management journey
Implications of weight bias: an unintended consequence of weight management
- stress: leading to binge eating, lower PA, physiological reactivity (increased levels of cortisol, CRP, HbA1c)= leads to weight gain and psychological distress
- healthcare quality: poorer treatment adherence, lower trust of HCP, avoidance of follow-up, poorer communication. Leads to poorer psychological health, including poorer glycemic control