Third-Party Beneficiaries Flashcards
third party beneficiary (TBP)
3P that benefits from a k entered into between other parties
promisor
party who promises to perform for TPB
promisee
party who secures promise
two types of TPB
- intended TPB
- Incidental TPB
intended TPB
- Named in K: parties to the K intend for TPB to benefit from the k
- Can enforce K: TPB has rights under K and can enforce directly
1 step: name in K
incidental TPB
- Unintended: stands to benefit from k although not intended by parties to k
- No rights: under k + no right to enforce k
determining TPB status
whether a TPB is an intended beneficiary under the k is a question of fact
courts look @ following factors
- is TPB expressly designated in k
- does TPB directly benefit from some performance under k
- does TPB have rights under k
- Does TPB stand in such relationship to the promisee under the k that an intent to benefit 3P can be inferred
If answer to any of the above is “yes,” more likely that TPB is intended
TPB characteristics
- not parties to k; merely beneficiaries
- intended TPBs have a right to sue for breach of k even though they are not parties to k
- Creditor TPBs
- donee TPBs
creditor TPB
benefit is conferred based on a debt owed by the promisee to k
donee TPB
benefit is conferred gratuitously
requirement for TPB to enforce right
TPB’s rights must vest first before TPB can enforce
vesting of TPB rights
occurs when TPB either:
1. Accepts benefits: of k in a manner requested by parties to k,
2. Sues to enforce: brings suit to enforce k, or
3. detrimental reliance: detrimentally rlies on K (ie, materially changes position in justifiable reliance on k)
changes to TPB rights timing
k can be rescinded/modified until TPB’s rights have vested unless
1. TPB consents, or
2. K provides otherwise
enforcement of TPB k
- either promisee or TPB can enforce rights against promisor
- Promisor has same defenses against TBP as against promisee
- promisee can sue promisor at law and in equity for specific performance
- creditor beneficiary can sue promisee on existing obligation between them
- donee beneficiary may only sue promisee if detrimental reliance exists