Theory Flashcards
What are the two ways that we can understand the term ‘rhetoric’?
- rhetoric might be understood in terms of ‘rhetoricity’ - property of a type of language allied to/ identical with the literary
- rhetoric might also be considered as the art of persuasive speech (practical art)
How did Aristotle define ‘a really distinguished style’ in the Poetics?
“a really distinguished style varies ordinary diction through the employment of unusual words”
What did Aristotle mean by the term ‘unusual’ in the Poetics when he identified that the use of unusual words is a component of ‘a really distinguished style’?
“strange words and metaphor and lengthened words and everything that goes beyond ordinary diction”
If, says Aristotle, someone was to write only in unusual words ie. “strange words and metaphor and lengthened words and everything that goes beyond ordinary diction” - what would be the result?
“a riddle or a barbarism”
What origin does the word ‘barbarism’ have and what significance does this hold?
the word ‘barbarism’ comes from ‘babbler’ or ‘barbarous’ - links an experience of strangeness to not understanding
What is the implication of limiting barbarism?
only so much foreignness is acceptable
What kind of language is connected to barbarism?
rude or unpolished language
Which two theorists and their texts can be put in discussion on the topic of rhetoric?
Erasmus, Copia vs. Paul de Man, The Resistance to Theory
What did rhetoric mean to Erasmus?
Erasmus himself - world of courtly politics, rhetoric was a social performance and was in social/ political contexts - supposed to have impressive variety, intention was not to make a successful act of communication
What was copia?
Copia - a style of abundance in rhetoric
What function did copia have?
means of avoiding tautologia (repetition of a word or phrase)
What is the relationship of form and content in copia?
whatever aspects of the form shift - the meaning of the content is maintained (even though he introduces ‘possible figures, tropes and schemes of rhetoric’)
What are the three aspects of the trivium as De Man sees it?
Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic
What does grammar serve in De Man’s trivium?
logic
How is logic defined in De Man’s theory?
Logic = the rigour of linguistic discourse - it allows access to the phenomenal world (ie. the world and its objective reality)
Where does the ‘literary’ sit in De Man’s trivium?
the ‘literary’ foregrounds the rhetoric aspect of the trivium over grammar/ logic
Where do speech and tropes fit in the trivium?
they straddle the borderlines between grammar and rhetoric
True or false - in De Man’s view literature works by logic
False - “literature is not a transparent message”, “the grammatical decoding of a text leaves a reside of indetermination”
What are the two purposes of literature as defined by Sir Philip Sidney in An Apologie for poetrie?
‘to teach and delight’
What kinds of images did Philip Sidney use in order to convey people ‘at their best and worst’?
through ‘notable images of virtues, vices’
Did Philip Sidney aim for novelistic realism?
No, even though his ‘Arcadia’ was an inspiration for the modern novel
In what writing, by what author in what year, is apostrophe described as a ‘turning’?
Abraham Fraunce, The Arcadian Rhetoric (1588)
In Abraham Fraunce’s The Arcadian Rhetoric (1588) - list the types of turning that a character can do
- to men
- sometimes from men to gods
- poetic invocations
- sometimes to a dumb and senseless creature
- sometimes brute beasts
We might say that In Abraham Fraunce’s view of Apostrophe as ‘turning’ in The Arcadian Rhetoric (1588) might not account for when an apostrophe is used at the beginning of a text. Why would this not hold up?
To Fraunce, an apostrophe used at the beginning of a poem is still a turn because the poem has turned away from what is expected of the beginning of a poem