Theorists Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain Durkehim’s Key Theories

A
  • Functionalist theory, based on consensus - macro theory; all the institutions in society have apositive effect upon the individuals
  • Used the mechanical solidarity and organic analogy; to describe the shift that occurred from
    pre-industrialisation to industrialisation.
  • The modern collective consciousness: the shared norms and values that are now stressed
    are: individual dignity, equality of opportunity, work ethic and social justice
  • Social fact: the formula is social fact = externality (it exists out there in society) + constraint (it acts back upon the individual, exercising power and constraint over
    them) e.g. the law
  • State of anomie; state of normlessness, when the norms and values of the society rapidly change or are blurred by changes
  • Is functionalism still relevant today? There is evidently less of a collective consciousness
    due to postmodernism and industrialisation, we have become more individualised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain Parson’s Key Theories

A
  1. Work 1: ‘The Structure of Social Action’ (1937) – voluntaristic theory of social action.
    Social action is ‘individual’. ‘Can be understood as part of a larger system of normative orientations defined in terms of a general theory of social action’ It’s not just a response to stimulus but there are other factors e.g. norms, moral codes (HAMILTON)
  2. Work 2: ‘The social system’ (1951) – move from voluntarism to explore systems of action
    in social structures. Tthe focus is on how people are geared to enact roles associated with positions. Differentiation of roles - professions interdependency of roles.
  3. Work 3: ‘Concern with social evolution’ – 1) differentiation 2) adaptation 3) inclusion 4) generalisation of values 5) legitimization of the increasingly complex system
  4. The ‘unit act’ = individual ‘actor’ makes ‘choices’, in context of ‘norms’ and ‘values’, and
    ‘obstacles’. Unit acts made up of ‘systems of action’ (e.g. interaction) with institutionalised roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain Parson’s Action Theories

A

PARSONS ACTION THEORY: 1) Aim: ‘analytical realist’ theory of ‘subjective’ events - this
is the reality of action for people (creating a model for it)

2) Critique of utilitarian and behaviourism (materialistic)
theories of action (its mostly a response to a stimulus), maximisation of utility. Gaining from something. We need to think of culture and values in social action that determine
why people make rational decisions 3) Place of culture and ‘ultimate values’ 4) A social system consists in a plurality of individual actors interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect, actors who are motivated in terms of a tendency to the “optimization of gratification” and whose
relation to their situations, including each other, is defined and mediated in terms of a system of culturally structured and shared symbols

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the critiques of Parson’s Action Theory

A
  • WRIGHT MILLS: Theory of theory sake. ‘’To what is translated we must add
    that the roles making up an institution are not just one big ‘complementarity’ of shared expectations’.
  • 2) Conservatism: functionalism has the capacity to provide a critique of existing
    social conditions (MERTON)
  • 3) Western centrism: theory is mostly a defence of America and the American way
    of life, it’s about how America and the western way of living is better. Problematic.
  • 4) Not a verifiable theory: problem of causality in interdependent systems.
  • 5) Theory: abstraction as necessary for creation of social science own language.
    It’s about taking the most important concepts and looking at them through a new
    lens.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain how Parsons explains social change

A
  • Societies move from simple to complex structures e.g. in traditional society a single institution performs many roles e.g. church or local parish would provide religious services, politics and education, socialises its members but now it is split up
  • As societies develop, the kinship system loses these functions – to factories, schools, churches etc. Parsons calls this structural differentiation – a gradual process in which separate, functionally specialised institutions develop, each meeting a different need
  • Parsons also sees gradual change occurring through what he calls moving or a dynamic
    equilibrium – as a change occurs in one part of the system, it produces compensatory changes in other parts e.g. rise of industry brings about a change in the family from extended to nuclear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the system needs that Parsons identified

A

1) Goal attainment: society needs to set goals and allocate resources to achieve them. This is the
function of the political sub-system, through institutions such as parliament
2) Adaptation: the social system meets its members’ material needs. These needs are met by the
economic sub-system.
3) Integration: the different parts of the system must be integrated together in order to pursue
shares goals. This is performed by the sub-system of religion, education and the media
4) Latency: refers to processes that maintain society over time. The kinship sub-system provides
pattern maintenance (socialising individuals to go on performing the roles society requires) and
tension management (A place to let off steam after the stresses of work)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Merton’s criticiques of Parsons

A

1) Indispensability: Parsons assumes that everything in society is functionally indispensable in its existing form. Merton argues that this is an untested assumption and he points to the
possibility of functional alternatives E.G. Parsons assumes that primary socialisation is best
performed by nuclear family, but it may be that one parent families or communes do it just aswell or better
(EV = FEMINISM – escaping domestic abusive partner, better and safer, strong single mothers and dads and homosexual partners provide so much love)

2) Functional unity: Parsons assumes that all parts of society are tightly integrated into a single whole and assumes that change in one part will have a knock-on effect on all other parts. Complex modern societies have many parts, some of which may be only distantly related to one another. Some parts have functional autonomy, independence from others.

3) Universal functionalism: Parsons assumes that everything in society performs a positive
function for society as a whole. Some things might be functional for some but dysfunctional
for others (EV = Feminism and Marxism and other critical theories have developed this)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the external criticques of Functionalism

A

1) Logical criticisms
- Teleology is the idea that things exist because of their effect or function e.g. functionalists claim
that the families exist because children need to be socialised is teleological
- A REAL EXPLANATION of something is one that identifies its cause – and logically, a cause must come before its effect.

2) Conflict perspective criticisms –
- Marxists and Feminists argue that society is not harmonious – it is based on unequal power and inequalities which are perpetuated by every institution - shared values that functionalist society has are merely a cloak concealing the interests of the dominant class (ISA AND RSA)
Frank Pearce: nothing more than caring faces

3) Action perspective criticisms
- Dennis Wrong criticises functionalism’s over socialised or deterministic view of the individual
- the social system uses socialisation to shape people’s behaviour so that they will meet the system’s needs by performing their prescribes roles.
Individuals have no free will or choice
- The only social reality is the one that individuals construct by giving meaning to their worlds
(hypodermic syringe approach vs decoding approach – we choose what is real for us)

4) Postmodernist criticisms
- Functionalism is an example of a meta-narrative that attempts to create a model of the workings of society. An overall theory is no longer possible because today’s society is increasingly fragmented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain New Right Theories

A
  • Shares a lot in common with functionalism e.g. meritocratic society and the traditional family
  • Demonise the ‘underclass’, specifically single parent mothers and blames the state for being too generous with welfare and encouraging the ‘underclass’ to increase
  • Keynesian economics became discredited because of rising inflation in the 70s
  • PM Thatcher, argued that the free market, rather than government, was the most efficient allocator of resources

E.G YOUTH CLUBS BEING SHUT DOWN IN AND AROUNDLONDON – 88 IN LONDON ALONE – causing and fuelling further violent crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain evalutations for the New Right

A

EV: political ideology centred on neo-liberal principles it is ideologically blinkered

EV: many of their ideas are seen as simplistic and short-sighted, ignoring the complexities of modern society and reinforcing stereotypes that lack evidence

EV: Murray’s views on lone mothers and the underclass have been denounced by Walker as reliant on little more then ‘innuendo, assertions, and anecdotes’ rather than any firm evidence

EV: others challenge the naïve assumptions of the New Right that we have quality of opportunity and live
in a meritocracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain what historical materialism is

A
  • Materialism is the view that humans have material needs
  • They use the means of production to do so
  • In the earliest stage of human history, these forces are just unaided human labour, but over time peopledevelop tools, machines etc. to assist in production
  • Led to a division of labour develops between two classes: Bourgeoisie (class that owns the means of
    production) and Proletariat (class of labourers who are being exploited) by the owners of the means of production
  • We currently live in a society where we have a capitalist mode of production, this forms the economic
    base of society, this economic base shapes all other features of society (the superstructure of institutions) – shapes the nature of religion, law, education etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain what Marx meant by class society and exploitation

A
  • In the earliest history of human history, there are no classes, no private ownership and no exploitation everyone works, and everything is shared
  • Marx describes the early classless society as ‘primitive communism’, he believes that one day we are going to go back to our natural state
  • In class societies, one class owns the means of productions, which enables them to exploit the labour of others for their own benefit (clearly shown in Victorian era – workhouses full of poor, working for the rich – poor conditions and dangerous work conditions)
  • They cannot control the society’s surplus product – this is the different between what the labourers actually produce and what is needed simply to keep them alive and working
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain what Marx meant by capitalism

A

Capitalism has three distinctive features:

  • The proletariat legally free and separated from the means of production. They don’t own any means of production, they have to sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in return for wages in order to survive - not an equal exchange.
  • The proletariat do not receive the value of the goods that their labour produces, but only the cost of subsistence – of keeping them alive.
  • The difference between the two is the surplus value – the profit that the capitalist makes by selling the commodities that the proletariat have produced
  • Competition forces capitalists to pay the lowest wages possible
  • Capitalism continually expands the forces of production in its pursuit of profit – production becomes concentrated in ever-larger units (technological advances de-skill the workforce)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain what Marx meant by class consciousness

A

-Capitalism creates the conditions under which the working class can develop a consciousness of its own economic political interests in opposition to those of its exploiters
- Aware of the needs to overthrow capitalism
- EV = hypodermic syringe approach vs decoding) – do we have free will or is reality distorted through ruling class tools, such as the media?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain what Marx meant by ideology

A
  • The class that owns the means of production also owns and controls the means of mental production – the production of ideas
  • The dominant ideas in society are the ideas of the economically dominant class
  • The institutions that produce and spread ideas, such as religion, education, media, all serve the dominant class by producing ideologies
  • Ideology gives us a false consciousness in the subordinate classes and helps to sustain class inequality
  • Marx used the analogy of the ‘camera obscura’ to show that ideology is a set of ideas capable of making circumstances appear upside down and inverting our perception of reality; the workers end up supporting capitalism which exploits them
  • Ideology that pervades the superstructure therefore alters and distorts the individual’s perception of the
    outer world – their objective social reality
  • RSA – Think about who is now being targeted - LINK TO RACE, CRIME AND AGENTS OF SOCIAL CONTROL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain what Marx meant by alienation

A
  • Alienation is the result of our loss of control over our labour and its product and therefore our separation from our true nature
  • Alienation exists in all class societies because the owners control the production process for their own needs

Alienation reaches its peak for two reasons:

  1. Workers are completely separated from and have no control over the forces of production
  2. Workers is reduced to an unskilled labourer mindlessly repeating a meaningless task (they cannot even afford the items they make with their salary)
  • Religion for Marxism also causes alienation and exploitation – making people believe that if they work hard and well, then they will be praised in the afterlife
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain what Marx meant by the state and revolution

A

Marx defines the state as armed bodies of men – the army, police, prisons etc.
- The state exists to protect the interests of the class of owners who control it (form the ruling class)
- Use the state as a weapon in the class struggle, to protect their property, suppress opposition and prevent revolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are two evaluations of Marx’s theories?

A

1) Class
- Simplistic, one dimensional view of inequality – sees class as the only important division
- Weber: status and power differences can also be important sources of inequality,
- Weber sub divides the proletariat into skilled and unskilled classes, and includes a white-collar middle class of office workers and a petty bourgeoisie

2) Economic determinism
- Marx’s base superstructure model is criticised for economic determinism – view that economic factors are the sole cause of everything in society, including social change
- Fails to recognise freewill
- Weber argues that it was the emergence of a new set of idea e.g. Calvinism that led to help bring modern capitalism into being (e.g. work ethic was high brought about capitalism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is humanistic marxism?

A

e.g Gramsci, draws on Marx’s early writings, focusing on alienation and people’s subjective experience of the world

  • Voluntarism: humans have free will. Active agents who make their own history. Their consciousness and ideas are central to changing the world
  • Socialism will come about when people become conscious of the need to overthrow capitalism
  • Encourages political action, time is always ripe for revolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is scientific marxism?

A

E.g. Althusser, draws on Marx’s later work, where he writes about the laws of capitalist development
- Marxism is a science – discovers the laws that govern the workings of capitalism
- Determinism: structural factors determine the course of history – individuals are passive puppets, victims of ideology manipulated by forces beyond their control
- Socialism will come about only when the contradictions of capitalism ultimately bring about the
system’s inevitable collapse
- Discourages political action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Explain Gramsici’s key ideas

A
  • Proletariat must develop its own ‘counter hegemony’ to win the leadership of society from the bourgeoise

Gramsci sees the ruling class maintaining its dominance over society in two ways:
1) Coercion: it uses the army, police, prisons and courts of the capitalist state to force other classes to accept its rule (RSA)
2) Consent (hegemony): it uses ideas and values to persuade the subordinate classes that its rule is legitimate (e.g. religion – God intended this way, ruling class were chosen by God to rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explain how the hegemony of the ruiling class is never complete

A
  • The ruling class are a minority: to rule, they need to create a power bloc by making alliances with other groups

1) The proletariat have a dual consciousness: their ideas are influenced not only by bourgeois ideology, but also by their material conditions of life – the poverty and exploitation they experience
- There is always the possibility of ruling-class hegemony being undermined, particularly at times of economic crisis

  • Gramsci: the working class can only win this battle for ideas by producing their own ‘organic intellectuals’ by this he means a body of workers, who are able to formulate an alternative vision of how society could be run
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Evaluate Gramsci’s key ideas

A
  • Accused of over-emphasising the role of ideas and under emphasising the role of both state coercion and economic factors –
  • E.G. workers may wish to overthrow capitalism, but be reluctant to try because they fear state repression or unemployment - they need the means of employment to help them survive in this society (very materialistic and consumeristic)
  • Sociologists stress the role of ideas and consciousness as the basis of resisting domination and changing society e.g. Willis describes the working class lads who saw through the schools’ ideology to recognise that meritocracy is a myth – but they still managed to slot themselves into meaningless labour jobs
  • HUMANISTIC MARXISTS SEE HUMANS AS CREATIVE BEINGS, ABLE TO MAKE HISTORY THROUGH THEIR CONSCIOUS ACTIONS – People shape society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Explain Althusser’s key ideas

A

Structural determinism, there are three structures/levels:
1) Economic level: comprising all those activities that involve producing something in order to satisfy a need
2) Political level: comprising all forms of organisation
3) Ideological level: involving the ways that people see themselves and their world
In this model the political and ideological levels have relative autonomy or partial independence from the economic level.

  • Economic level dominates in capitalism BUT the ideological and political levels perform indispensable functions e.g. workers who rebel must be punished.
  • The state performs political and ideological
    functions that ensure the reproduction of capitalism:
    RSA (repressive state apparatus)
    ISA (ideological state apparatus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Explain Althusser’s key criticsms of humanist marxism

A

For structuralist Marxists, our sense of free will, choice and creativity is an illusion. Everything about us is the product of underlying social structures
Craib – society is a puppet theatre, we are merely puppets, and these unseen structures are the hidden puppet master, determining all our thoughts and actions

  • Socialism will not come about because of a change of consciousness but will come about because of a crisis of capitalism resulting from over-determination (the contradictions in the three structures that
    occur relatively independently of each other, resulting in the collapse of the system as a whole)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Evaluate Althusser’s key ideas

A
  • Humanistic Marxists such as Gouldner: scientific approach discouraged political activism because it stresses the role of structural factors that individuals can do little to affect
  • E.P. Thompson criticises Althusser for ignoring the fact that it is the active struggles of the working class that can change society – accuses Althusser of elitism (belief that communist party knows what is best for the workers, who should therefore blindly follow the party’s lead)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Explain Willis study of working-class bodies

A
  • Working class counter school culture rejects middle class values – formal academic knowledge is derided as feminine – practical jobs are believed to be masculine
  • The boys develop a counterculture that resists the philosophy of school, namely that academic hard work will lead to
    progress.
  • Through language, dress etc. they make clear that their rejection of middle class ideals and instead emphasise their belief in practical skills and life experience, developing what Willis sees as a patriarchal attitude
  • The boys see academic knowledge as feminine and pupils who aspire to achieve as ‘’ear’oles’’ and inferior
  • The lads experience their employment as a matter of theirown free choice rather than exploitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Describe and evaluate Butler’s theories

A

Problem with sex/gender dualism: **
* Gender is material (as well as social) e.g. gender performed through the body. Sex is social (as well as biological)
* BUTLER – sex as social grouping of bodily aspects, social selection of important distinctions, gender concept naturalises sex
BUTLER – gender identity as a performance, gender is what we do not what we are.
* Gender trouble and the importance of the body for consumption and identity – cultural configurations of gender have seized a hegemonic hold (
GRAMSCI**): needs to be challenges (subversive action): the mobilisation, subversive confusion, and proliferation of genders and therefore identity.
BUTLER – we all put on a gender performance, whether traditional or not, it is not a question of whether we do a gender performance, but what form of performance will take.
* By choosing to be different about it, we might work to change gender norms and the binary understanding of masculinity and femininity
* People perform in ways that are expected of them by their culture – traditional expectations of gender are based on how most people behave in their culture – gender is a kind of imitation for which there is no original – gender is what you do, rather than a universal notion of who you are (we perform gender e.g. female gender is known to wear dresses)
* Critiques: some have argued that she implies a lack of free will in those imitating the sexual norms of society, whereas in fact those norms have frequently been broken by those who felt uncomfortable with them. Many postmodern thinkers believe that her writing has attracted the criticism that its convoluted form conceals some basically simple ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Describe and Evaluate Liberal Feminim

A

Liberal Feminism
1. Challenging the limitations of the female role
2. Opening up equality of opportunity for women

Greer: women liberation, sex and the pill
1. Highly positive with the changes that have been occurring
2. Optimistic about the future and what lays ahead for women, acknowledging the evident process that women have made
3. Believe that we can change and see more progress by tackling/challenging attitudes and laws
e.g Evident with equal pay act of 1970 and sex discrimination act of 1975
e.g GIST and WISE are also important campaigns as they attempt to bring more girls into engineering and science, allowing girls to branch out into subjects that traditionally are male dominated

**EV **- radicals believe that liberals are too passive when it comes to progress, we still have sexual harassment within all institutions, including schools and workplaces, issues such as this have not been addressed enough and need to change
**EV **- laws are just caring faces, they are there to mute the population that it is addressed for e.g. equal pay act, women are still not paid equal (17.1% less in the UK)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Explain the key ideas of liberal feminism

A

**LIBERAL FEMINISTS **sexist attitudes and stereotypical beliefs about gender are culturally constructed and transmitted through socialisation.
* To achieve gender equality, we must change society’s socialisation patterns 🡪 promote appropriate role models in education and the family e.g. fathers doing more domestic tasks.
* Also, challenging stereotyping in the media (over time, such actions will produce cultural change and gender equality will become the norm

Enlightenment project and its faith in progress:
1. Changes in socialisation and culture are gradually leading to more rational attitudes to gender and overcoming ignorance and prejudice
2. Political action to introduce anti-discriminatory laws and policies is steadily bringing about progress to a fairer society in which a person’s gender is no longer important

EV = Liberal feminists can be seen as a critique of functionalism 🡪 gender roles (Parsons), who distinguishes between instrumental (public sphere) and expressive roles (private sphere)
E.g In modern society, when women began to work and to prove themselves worthy of being able to do a man’s job – it actually made things harder – women were expected to do dual labour (work and household – paid and unpaid labour) 🡪 this is why we need more men branching out and helping with housework and childcare (Can argue that this does happen now, in western societies at least – must expand it across the globe - new man)
* Men and women are equally capable of performing roles in both spheres and that traditional gender roles prevent both men and women from living fulfilling lives
**Liberal feminism **recognises conflict between men and women, these are not seen as inevitable but merely a product of outdated attitudes
* Believe that women’s rights have come a long way and looks at it in an optimistic way – we have gained a lot of rights and we have been successful.
* Believes that women’s emancipation is a ‘win-win’ situation that will help men gain too (e.g. hegemonic masculinity vs subordinate masculinity – will allow men to express their feminine nurturing side, which current gender stereotypes force them to suppress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Describe and Evaluate Radicial Feminim

A

Radical feminism
1. Patriarchy: the rule of the father was the fundamental oppression within society and pre-dated capitalism and class oppression
Firestone: suggested that women would only be free when birth was done by machines she combined this with an idea of separation from women’s natural condition of difference and from men
* Exposed such oppressions as: rape, domestic violence, child sexual abuse
* Women must separate themselves from men, who’s desire is always to dominate women - knives, missiles and penises (all swords of the pig)

Greer: believe that women should drink their own menstrual blood, in order to prove that they are a woman
Firestone and Holt: believe that men are the enemy and the direct oppressors of women, 99% of men oppress women
Segregation: to stop men from being in contact with women, proved useful with women’s refuges e.g. domestic violence
Political lesbianism: becoming lesbians in order to avoid sleeping with the enemy

EV - cannot change someone’s sexuality, therefore lesbianism maybe an unrealistic solution
* Even though some solutions are unrealistic, they had influenced many women to stand up for themselves and to be more active; evident with various movements across the world such as *Pussy Riot in Russia and the tampax tax protests that occurred in London because sanitary products are not luxuries but are necessities *
*Women are not conforming to the gender norms that are put forward like not shaving frequently and not wearing make up *

EV - functionalists believe in the nuclear family and socialisation, equips the child with the necessities that are needed to socially conform to the societies norms and values
EV - Marxism believes that there is more of a class issue e.g. class exploitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Explain the key ideas of radical feminism

A
  • Emerged in the 70s, key concept is patriarchy **‘rule by fathers’ **– a society where men dominate women. They make the following claims:
  • Patriarchy is universal: male domination of women exists in all known societies.
  • Firestone: the origins of patriarchy lie in women’s biological capacity to bear and care for infants, since performing this role means they become dependent on males
  • Patriarchy is the primary and most fundamental form of social inequality and conflict. The key division in society is between men and women. Men are women’s main enemy
  • All men oppress all women. All men benefit from patriarchy – especially from women’s unpaid domestic labour and from their sexual services** (EV = Kingsley Davis)**
  • Patriarchal oppression is direct and personal – occurs not only in the public sphere but also in the family (private)
  • Radical feminists see the personal as political: all relationships involve power and they are political when one individual try to dominate another.
  • Personal relationships between the sexes are therefore political because men dominate women through them – radical feminists refer to these power relationships as sexual politics; Has the effect of controlling all women e.g. Brownmiller: fear of rape is a powerful deterrent against women going out alone at night** (EV = Heidensohn, media and patriarchy – Islington crime survey – 54%) **
  • Radical feminism also sheds new light on the nature of sexuality – mainstream sociology regards sexuality as a natural biological urge BUT radical feminists argue that patriarchy constructs sexuality so as to satisfy men’s desires e.g. women are portrayed in pornography as passive sex objects and penetration as the main source of sexual pleasure – creates unrealistic fantasies of men, who then coerce their partners to do stuff they are not comfortable with
    Adrienne Rich: men force women into a narrow and unsatisfying ‘compulsory heterosexuality’, which becomes the only socially acceptable form of sexuality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Describe and Evaluate Marxist Feminism

A

Marxist feminism
1. Believe that gender and capitalism are interlinked, women produce the free labour force e.g. reproducing and socialising the next generation of labour force into the capitalist hierarchy

Ansley: ‘‘women are the takers of shit’’ - this is because women absorb their husbands anger and instead of revolting, they release their anger (built up by capitalism) upon their wives, causing a revolution to not occur (arguably working class women are affected more)

  • Solution: to revolt, working class women are affected more by domestic violence, must address this

EV - revolution is not realistic, only occurred in Russia in 1917

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Explain the key ideas of Marxist feminism

A

** Dismiss liberal feministview that women’s subordination is merely the product of stereotyping or outdated attitudes
Reject radical feminists **view that it is the result of patriarchal oppression by men
**Marxist feminists **see women’s subordination as rooted in capitalism.
* Individual men may benefit from women’s subordination, the main beneficiary is capitalism
* Women’s subordination in capitalist society results from their primary role as unpaid homemaker, which places them in a dependent economic position in the family.
* Their subordination performs a number of important functions for capitalism:
* Women are a source of cheap, exploitable labour: for employers.
* They can be paid less because it is assumed, they will be partially dependent on their husbands’ earnings
* Women are a reserve army of labour: that can be moved into the labour force during economic booms and out again at times of recession. They can be treated as marginal workers in this way because it is assumed their primary role is in the home
* Women reproduce the labour force: through their unpaid domestic labour, both by nurturing and socialising children to become the next generation of workers and by maintaining and servicing the current generation of workers – their husbands. They do this at no cost to capitalism
(Benson)

* Women absorb anger: that would otherwise be directed at capitalism. Ansley describes wives as ‘takes of shit’ who soak up the frustration their husbands feel because of the alienation and exploitation they suffer at work.
* For Marxist Feminists, this explains male domestic violence against women. Men go to work and are tired and frustrated with their subordinate masculinity and subordinate roles/positions at work.
* They come home and instead of releasing their anger at their colleagues or at capitalism, they express it upon their wives – capitalism causes domestic violence** (EV = domestic violence happens in all classes and backgrounds)**

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Describe and evaluate Dual-system feminism

A
  • Have sought to combine the key features of Marxist and Radical feminism in a single theory
    **An economic system – capitalism
    A sex-gender system – patriarchy **
  • Dual systems theorists such as Hartmann see capitalism and patriarchy as two intertwined systems that form a single entity ‘patriarchal capitalism’
  • These theorists accept that patriarchy is universal, but they argue that patriarchy takes a **specific form in capitalist societies **
  • To understand women’s subordination, we must look at the relationship between their position both in the domestic division of labour and in paid work e.g. domestic work limits women’s availability for paid work – but the lack of work opportunities drives many woman into marriage and economic dependence on a man (two systems reinforce each other)

Walby 🡪 Capitalism and patriarchy are inter-related. The interests of the two are not always the same. They collide over the exploitation of female labour. While capitalism demands** cheap female labour for its workforce, patriarchy resists this, wanting to keep women subordinated to men within the private, domestic sphere.
* In the long run
capitalism is usually more powerful and so patriarchy adopts a strategy of segregation** instead: women are allowed into the capitalist sphere of paid work, but only in low status ‘women’s’ jobs, subordinated to men

EV = Walby’s approach is useful because it shows how the two system interact and structure one another, without assuming that their interests always coincide
Pollert: patriarchy is not actually a system in the same sense as capitalism, which is driven by its own internal dynamic for profit making. Patriarchy is merely a descriptive term for a range of practices such as male violence and control of women’s labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Describe Heidensohn’s Theories

A

Heidensohn
* Found that women commit less crime due to the controls in society
* Home: dual labour; free childcare + cooking at home, while expecting to go to paid job and pay the bills. Domestic violence is also an issue.

  • Public: media overexaggerates sexual crimes.
    e.g Islington Crime Survey found that 54% of women are scared to go out alone after dark in the fear of sexual and violent crimes
  • Work: maternity and paternity leave not equal, no equal pay. Glass ceiling; less women in the managerial world, the higher you go up in the work hierarchy, the less women you will see.
  • Sexual harassment; male gaze is extended by the CCTV system and male teachers running into female headed classrooms if a fight breaks out
  • Women are evidently blamed for being rape victims - comments on how much she had to drink, amount of make-up and dress code.
  • Depending on their background, many men get away with rape e.g. Stanford rapist - upper class, white, prestigious university and good athlete
    2014 Canadian Judge - in court asks rape victim ‘‘why couldn’t you have kept your legs closed?’’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Describe Carlen’s Theories

A

Carlen
* When it comes to courts, female offenders are judged not on their crime but on their role as a mother, wife etc. Found in her study on criminal women that CJS forces femininity upon females
* Working class women may commit more crime due to the frustration that they experience by being rejected by a movement that is supposed to represent them
Chesney-Lind: found that more women are branching out into crime but these are usually drug related crimes which link to prostitution, which is a key and very unliberated crime

Gender and class deals - shows that if society doesn’t provide than women will turn to crime, the society in a way pushes certain women to crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Describe and Evaluate Difference Feminism

A

Difference feminism
* They want a universal feminism that represents all women from across the world.
* To them, radical and liberal feminism are only for middle class, white, western women but we need one that applies to all and deals with a more broad array of issues such as FGM and poverty etc.

Adichie: wrote a famous speech on feminism, being brought up in Nigeria and intellectual women like this are inspiring

Bell Hooks: argues that we need feminism for men also. Ever since colonialism, when the white man took charge of less developed countries, they viewed the black man to being inferior to the white man

e.g we are all women, we do not experience feminism in the same way e.g. others will experience gender barriers while others will experience racism, class barrier and gender
* For this reason we need a feminism that incorporates everything and everyone
* Inequalities within religion e.g. taboos with childbirth and menstruation, deemed as unclean and polluting, cannot touch holy script
e.g Victorian England - sex was only for the pleasure of the man and the wives had to obey
* Many feminists view the sex industry as degrading to women, strongly linked to sexual abuse and drug addiction

**EV **- many sex workers see themselves as independent women

  • All the gender norms are ingrained and start from birth especially when it comes to primary socialisation, taught from a young age how to do gender e.g. boys encouraged to play rough and play outside, respect women and protect them while girls are taught how to be caring, cook and clean like their mother and to obtain the bedroom culture
    Feminist researchers: have demonstrated how cultural and media products marketed to young audiences embody traditional attitudes towards gender and towards the sorts of aims and ambitions girls and boys are expected to have
    Freud: saw women as men who lacked a penis and argued that they envied males for possessing one (penis envy theory)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Describe and evaluate postmodernist feminism

A

Judith Butler:
* Concerned with discourses and power/knowledge
* Discourses are ways of seeing, thinking, or speaking about something. The world is made up of many, often competing, discourses e.g. religious, scientific, medical, and artistic
* By enabling its users to define others in certain ways, a discourse gives power over those it defines e.g. by **defining childbirth as a medical condition **and healthy women as patients, medical discourse empowers doctors and disempowers women
Knowledge is power – the power to define or constitute the identities of others
E.G. Enlightenment project is a form of discourse
* Butler argues that the **Enlightenment ideals were simply a form of power/knowledge that legitimated the domination of western, white, middle-class males over other groups **– these supposedly universal ideals that claimed to apply to all humanity in reality excluded women, black people and other oppressed groups

  1. ALSO, the white, western, middle-class women who dominate the feminist movement have falsely claimed to represent **‘universal womanhood’ – feminists are wrong to believe they can adapt the Enlightenment project **so that it somehow includes all women – because women are not a single entity who all share the same ‘essence’
    (EV = problems with essentialism – intersectionality – not all the same)
  2. For poststructuralism, there is no fixed essence of what it is to be a woman because our identities are constituted through discourses, and because there are many different discourses in different times and cultures, there can be no fixed entity called ‘womanhood’ that is the same everywhere
  3. E.G. womanhood in Saudi Arabia is constituted partly by Islamic discourse, whereas in the Western world its mainly discourses of advertising and the media
  4. Butler argues that poststructuralism offers advantages for feminism – its enables feminists to ‘de-construct’ different discourses to reveal how they subordinate women – as in the medicalisation of childbirth
  • Need to reject essentialism and by stressing the diversity of discourses, poststructuralism recognises and legitimates the diversity of women’s lives and struggles, rather than prioritising some and excluding others
    EV = they offer a theoretical basis for recognising the diversity of women’s experiences and struggles against oppression
    EV = Walby 🡪 agrees that there are differences among women, but she argues that there are also important similarities – they are all faced with patriarchy e.g. compared with men, women face a greater risk of low pay, domestic violence, and sexual assault
    EV = celebrating difference may have the effect of dividing women into an infinite number of sub-groups, thereby weakening feminism as a movement for change
    **EV = Segal **🡪 criticises poststructuralist feminism for abandoning any notion of real, objective socials structures. Oppression is not just the result of discourses – how we think and speak about women, it is about real inequality. Feminists should therefore continue to focus on the struggle for equality of wealth and income
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Describe and Evaluate Walby’s Theories

A

Walby’s Theory of patriarchy:

  • Understanding capitalism and patriarchy
  • Together: housework limits women’s public life (including work), whilst limits on women’s public equality (such as unequal pay and promotion) reinforces their primacy in housework, and leads women to value a husbands higher earnings
  • Historically we’ve moved from a system of private to public patriarchy and contemporary public patriarchy consists of 6 structures:
    1. Paid employment
    2. Household production
    3. Culture
    4. Sexuality
    5. Violence
    6. The state
  • Private patriarchy is based upon household production as the main site of women’s oppression
  • Private patriarchy uses a strategy of excluding women from public life, public patriarchy by contrast, works by segregating and subordinating them within the public sphere
  • Public patriarchy is based principally in public sites such as employment and the state’’ (Walby)
  • Even if you set out to have an equal relationship, different opportunities for men and women often lead to choices being made that reproduce gendered divisions of labour - especially when choosing partners and bringing up children (and now with elder care)

Criticism
Anna Pollert: abstract structuralism, a static form of system theory
* Walby analysis is too structural - it is not embedded in an empirical, micro-sociological study of lived experience *i.e. women’s experiences of home, work, sex etc.
Heidi Gottfried: gender must be analysed in lived experience in order to dissolve the static opposition of capitalism and patriarchy. Mutually constituting terms mean that there are no ungendered class relations and no gender without class dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What gender theories are patriarchal and focus on men e.g. Functionalism

A

Kingsley Davis: prostitution is okay because it acts as a safety valve, for the family
Murray: believes that single mother households breed deviance
Marxism: picks up on how capitalism is a ‘‘dog eat dog’’ system that thrives competition among men
Foucault: when talking about power and the body, addresses a man (androcentrism)
Oakley: distinguished between sex and gender and asserted that gender is a social construct
Butler: stated that gender is what we do, not what we are. We all put on a gender performance
Gender is a social construct - within the Victorian era, pink was the colour symbolising a new born boy, exacerbating that we as a society created a stereotypical boy and girl, attaching colours and toys etc. to the gender

Bowlby - **maternal deprivation **- not adequate socialisation (women should go back home after the second world war)
1,500 nurseries opened during world war 2 - allowing women to work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Describe Connell’s Theories

A

Connell:
* Men’s interest in patriarchy is condensed in hegemonic masculinity
* Assumed that masculinity is a natural, biological state that cannot be altered (it is actually an** acquired identity**)
* **Hegemonic vs subordinate masculinity **(class, ethnicity distinction?)
* Men reap significant benefits from maintaining dominance over women, their general interest and investment in patriarchy is formidable
Globalisation - *media glamorises the hegemonic ideal through its adulation of ruthless billionaire entrepreneurs and fighting fit, contact-sports stars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Describe Hook’s Theories

A

Bell Hooks
* White women do not experience the same intersectionality of oppressive forces as black women, so may not recognise them
* White women do not wish to be seen as unfeminine (a fear of breaking away from patriarchy’s gender roles)
* White women have a vested interest in exploiting class and race privileges, so they can be freed from dirty work
* Capitalism values money more than people, so the wealthy are seen as more important than the poor (**imperialism and colonialism **also remain relevant because historically, non-white peoples and their countries resources have been plundered and exploited by white supremacist capitalists in their pursuit of wealth )
* Cannot dismantle patriarchy as long as we are in collective denial about its impact on our lives
* Women in lower class and poor groups, particularly black women, would not define women’s liberation as equality with men, because men in their groups are also exploited and oppressed - they too lack social, political and economic power
* Women with multiple social privileges may see a situation as demonstrating just one form of oppression, rather than the intersectionality of many different types of oppression - may be due to ignorance
* Feminism is a political movement, not a romantic notion of personal freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Describe and evaluate difference/Black feminism

A
  • All feminist perspectives we have examined so far assume that all women share a similar situation and similar experience of oppression 🡪 ethnocentricity of other feminisms, blamed with essentialism
  • Different feminists do not see women as a single homogeneous group – argue that middle class and working-class women, white and black women, lesbian and heterosexual women have very different experiences of patriarchy, capitalism, racism, homophobia and so on
  • Feminist theory has claimed a** ‘false universality’ **for itself – claimed to be about women, but in reality it was about the experiences of white, western, heterosexual, middle-class women e.g. by seeing the family only as a source of oppression, white feminists have neglected black women’s experience of racial oppression – many black feminists view the black family positively as a source of resistance against racism
  • Western beauty regimes have now damaged many women across the world. They are coercing and encouraging women who do not fit the** ‘Western beauty ideal’ **to change their traditions to be deemed beautiful – e.g. black women straightening their hard and Asian women getting surgery to widen their eyes
  • They want a** universal feminism that represents all women from across the world. To them, radical and liberal feminism are only for middle class, white, western women but we need one that applies to all and deals with a broader array of issues such as FGM and poverty** etc.

Bell Hooks: argues that we need feminism for men also. Ever since colonialism, when the white man took charge of less developed countries, they viewed the black man to being inferior to the white man
* Evidently, even though we are all women, we do not experience feminism in the same way e.g. others will experience gender barriers while others will experience racism, class barrier and gender. For this reason we need a feminism that incorporates everything and everyone

Calhoun and Nicholson: described as difference feminists recognise that women’s experiences of family life varies depending on their type of household. They are critical of feminist perspectives that overlook the simple point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Describe Oakley’s Theories and Study

A

Oakley **
* Housework is directly opposed to self-actualisation
* Housework in capitalist and patriarchal societies is exploitative because it is low status work that is assumed to come naturally to women – because it offers little opportunity for creativity or self-fulfilment
* Oakley in 1974 undertook one of the first feminist sociological studies into domestic labour when she interviewed 40 London housewives between the ages of 20-30, all of whom had at least one child under five.
Findings:
* Housework should be understood as a job and not a natural extension of a woman’s role as a wife or mother
* Women are compelled to engage in domestic duties for no wages (
exploitation**)
* Domestic duties have often been regarded as natural for women due to their ability to give birth
* It does not occur to most women to demand wages for the work they give for free - ideology serves to disguise this fact by presenting housework as natural for women and not worthy of a wage
* Oakley insists that the majority of housewives are dissatisfied with their lot, finding nothing inherently satisfying about their work, which is lonely, monotonous, and boring
* Women report feelings of alienation from their work more frequently than factory workers; this is due in part to their sense of social isolation as housewives – many of them had careers before marriage which they subsequently gave up; have no autonomy or control; responsibility for the work is theirs alone and if it is not done they risk an angry husband or sick children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

How do feminists examine the family and how this impacts women?

A

Family: key site of welfare; has explored the extent to which families remain the main source of care of children and older people and in particular, highlighted how much of this care is provided by women.
* Feminism has exposed the ways in which the traditional family of a married heterosexual couple and children has been privileged over and devalued other ways of living such as lone parent and gay and lesbian families
* The implications for social policy of the questioning of the public-private divide: it has translated a number of issues deemed ‘private’ into legitimate concerns of public policy, domestic violence is a prime example.
* It has turned the spotlight on the impact of public policies and practices on relations within the family e.g. a range of public policies, including childcare and social security, affect mothers’ access to an independent income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

How do feminists examine the state and how this impacts women?

A

State: women’s lives are more dependent on and determined by state policies than men’s - no single feminist theory of the state
Feminist conceptualisations of the state:
Liberal feminism: the neutral state, which acts as a benign and neutral arbiter between different interest groups and to which feminists can appeal to improve women’s position
Radical feminism: the patriarchal state, which serves men’s interests and reinforces gender inequalities.
Marxist feminism: the capitalist state, which sustains capitalism
Socialist feminism: combines Marxist feminists’ analysis of the capitalist state with radical feminism’s identification of the state’s patriarchal nature
Black and anti-racist feminism: the racist state, which reinforces racial as well as gender inequalities
Postmodernist feminism: the post-structuralist or postmodernist state, which does not represent a single set of interests or operate as an undifferentiated unity but which nevertheless has gendered effects
1. Feminists show that the state impacts on women in gender-specific ways and helps to construct gender relations, but at the same time, the activities of different women and women’s movements impact on the state (2006)
2. Feminists have exposed the discriminatory character of welfare programs and their function to reinforce sexist arrangements in domestic and public life’ in the face of a dominant literature, which simply did not use gender as a category of analysis (Gordon, 1990)
E.g the state can support and oppress women e.g. social security system - this can provide women with the independent income necessary to leave a relationship, yet in many countries it also serves to perpetuate their economic dependence within that relationship by basing entitlement on the couple rather than the individual

48
Q

How did Hernes describe a women-friendly state?

A

**Theory: Women-friendly state (coined by Norwegian feminist, Helga Hernes) **-
* she defines it as a state which would not force harder choices on women than on men
* women as well as men can be both autonomous individuals and parents
* injustice on the basis of gender is largely eliminated without an increase in other forms of inequality, such as among groups of women
* women are still less likely than men to have formal power as welfare state shapers - whether the state is regarded as patriarchal or women-friendly
* the state would interacts with families and helps to regulate the relationship between them and the labour market in ways that help to shape gender relations

49
Q

How do feminists examine the labour market/work and how this impacts women?

A

Labour market: the paid work that women do in the labour market often mirrors the unpaid work they do in the home, which helps to explain why it tends to be low paid, at the same time,
* If men are able to earn higher wages than women, it makes economic sense for a couple to pursue a traditional gendered division of labour, thereby setting up a vicious circle.
* The continued gender pay gap (17% in the UK) which operates to a greater or lesser extent world-wide is one example of how the labour market operates as a gendered institution - reflects continued occupational segregation, which means that women and men are often doing different kinds of work.
* Men still find it easier than women to climb occupational hierarchies; women both hit glass ceilings and get held back on sticky floors.
* Despite their increased participation in the labour market world-wide, women find themselves part of workplaces that are imbued with a masculinist, exclusionary ethos - more extreme forms, this ethos involves sexual harassment

Work: instead of equating work with paid work, as often still happens, feminist analysis has broadened our understanding of work to include caring, housework and also voluntary (Irving,2008)

50
Q

How do feminists examine care/dependance/time and citizenship/community and how this impacts women?

A
  • Care: it was something of a breakthrough to reveal that care is work and often very demanding work. Feminist research has demonstrated the importance of this work in both its paid and unpaid forms
  • It has explored the gendered processes of care and the relations involved in caring and being cared for, together with the values associated with caring** (Leira and Saraceno, 2000)**

Dependence: in contrast to the dominant preoccupation with dependence on welfare in the public sphere, feminist analysis has explored the implications of women’s economic dependence on men in the private sphere and how that has been underpinned by welfare policies
* It has also revealed the unequal relationship of interdependence of which it is a part, in which men are often dependent on women for care and servicing (Lister, 2003)

Citizenship: feminist scholarship has exposed women’s traditional exclusion from full citizenship to be not accidental but a product of the gendered assumptions upon which mainstream notions of citizenship have been constructed (Hobson and Lister, 2002)

Nation and community: have highlighted how women’s relationship and men’s relationship to nation and community are constructed differently
* Women are often treated as cultural symbols of the nation and as responsible for maintaining community cohesion.
* What they wear and how they behave in both public and private spheres, are judged through the prism of nation and community

Time: feminist analysis treats time as a gendered scarce resource alongside and interacting with status, money and power
* It is a resource alongside and essential for undertaking different forms of work and for active citizenship

51
Q

What’s the difference between essentialist feminism and difference feminism?

A

Essentialist feminism - celebrate the difference between men and women - physically and place in society and philosophies, alongside approaches to life. Men and women should be treated differently in society
**Constructivist feminism **- we should all be equal, it’s not about the role. Choose own gender, everyone should be treated equally because in the present there is nothing that women cannot do that men can

52
Q

What are the problems with essentialism?

A
  • Essentialism is the idea that all women share the same fundamental essence – all women are essentially the same and all share the same experiences of oppression
  • Difference feminists argue that **liberal, Marxist, and radical feminists are essentialist **– they see all women as the same 🡪 as a result, they fail to reflect the diversity of women’s experiences and they exclude other women and their problems e.g. some argue that the preoccupation of western feminism with sexuality is irrelevant to women in poorer countries, where access to clean water and primary healthcare are far more pressing problems
53
Q

What changes has feminism led to within society?

A

To sociology:
* Sex previously not considered, focused on public rather than private (romantic and intimate lives were not considered, feminist sociology began to talk about sex and consent, about domestic labour,
* SOCIETY HAS A HIERARCHY THAT GIVES MEN MORE POWER THAN WOMEN), favouring of methodologies (quantitative methodologies to qualitative and quantitative methods,
e.g Oakley’s study, class is one of the key ways in which society is organised, until the 80’s only the man would be asked what he earned, not the woman because economic success was seen to be the men’s success, feminist sociology has changed this)

To society:
* Women’s rights (is pornography violence against women? Recent issue), attitudes toward women, work, sexuality.
* White people get to determine what is racist, men determine what is sexist (the** power evidence is interesting, the majority telling the minority how to behave**)
* James Messerschmitt: Subordinate and hegemonic masculinity. Intersectional issue. Working class men may feel threatened by women taking their jobs. In movies, men are seen to be dominant, muscles, young and handsome.
* Femininity is associated with homosexuality; men always try to portray themselves as being ‘masculine’, aggressive and macho

54
Q

What are some general evalautions of feminism?

A

EV – the strength of feminism is that it redresses the way in which women have been systematically ignored from malestream sociology. As a perspective it focuses on the issues and meanings of being female, and the oppression of women by patriarchal forces
EV – there are many branches and types of feminism which means that they all develop of each other strengths and weaknesses – making a feminism that is inclusive of everyone and constantly develops over time, to be better each time and focus on working on the weaknesses of other branches
EV: ethnocentric, largely ignoring black women. It ignores the fact that for black women racial oppression may be of equal or greater significance
EV – it **ignores the positive way **in which many women view the family and relationships with women

55
Q

What are action theories?

A

Action Theories

  • They are ‘micro’ level, bottom-up approaches that focus on the actions and interactions of individuals
  • Action theories are more voluntaristic – they see individuals as having free will and
    choice
  • Humans possess agency – the
    ability to act as free agents, creating and shaping society through our choices, meanings, and actions.
  • All 4 action theories emphasise action or interaction, they differ in how far they see a
    role for structural explanations of behaviour.
    Weber and symbolic interactionism assume that
    the social structure can influence how we act.
    Phenomenology and ethnomethodology reject the very idea that there is a social structure ‘out there’ influencing our behaviour. For them, what we call ‘society’ is a construct, not a real thing.
56
Q

Explain the key details of Weber’s social action theory

A

Max Weber: Social Action Theory

  • Weber saw both structural and action approaches as necessary for a full understanding of human behaviour
  • The level of cause: explaining the **objective structural factors **that shape people’s behaviour
  • The level of meaning: understanding the subjective meanings that individuals attach to their actions
  • Unless we account for both of these levels, our explanation will be incomplete or false
57
Q

Explain the types of rational action that Weber believed in

A

Types of action
- There are an infinite number of subjective meanings that actorsmay give to their actions
- Weber attempts to classify actions into four types, based on their meaning for the actor:
1. Instrumentally rational action: is where the actor calculates the most efficient means of achieving a given goal
E.g. a capitalist may calculate that the most efficient way of maximising profit is to pay low wages. This** action is not about whether the goal itself is desirable** – e.g. it could be distributing charity or committing genocide. It is simply about the most efficient way of reaching that goal, whatever it may be
2. Value-rational action: involves action towards a goal that the actor regards as desirable for its own sake e.g. a believer worshipping their god in order to get to heaven. Unlike
instrumental rationality, there is no way of calculating whether the means of achieving the goal are effective – e.g. the believer has no way of knowing whether performing a particular ritual will gain him salvation

58
Q

Explain the two other types of action that Weber belives in

A

Types of action
* There are an infinite number of subjective meanings that actors may give to their actions
1. **Traditional action
: involves customary, routine, or habitual actions. Weber does not see
this type of action as rational, because no conscious thought or choice has gone into it. Rather, the actor does it because
‘we have always done it’**
2. Affectual action: is action that expresses emotion – e.g. weeping out of grief, or violence sparked by anger. Weber sees affectual action as important in religious and political movements with charismatic leaders who attract a following based on their emotional appeal

59
Q

Explain evaluations of Weber’s Social Action theory

A

Evaluation

  • His ideas are a** valuable corrective** to the **over-emphasis on structural factors **that we see in
    functionalism etc. and an affirmation that we must also understand actors’ subjective meanings, if we want to explain their actions adequately
  • Schutz: Weber’s view of action is too individualistic and cannot explain the shared nature of meanings. E.g. when a person at an auction raises their arm, they mean that they are making
    a bid, but Weber does not explain how everyone else present also comes to give this gesture the same meaning
  • EV - Weber advocated the use of verstehen or empathetic understanding of the actor’s subjective meaning – where we put ourselves in the actor’s place to understand their motives
    and meanings. However, as we cannot actually be that other person, we can never be sure we have truly understood their motives
60
Q

Explain Mead’s theory about symbols and how they are perceived

A

Symbols vs Instincts
- Observed that, unlike animals, our behaviour is not shaped by fixed, pre-programmed instincts
- We respond to the world by giving meanings to the things that are significant to us
- We create and inhabit a world of meanings. We do this by attaching symbols to the world.
- A symbol is something that stands for or represents something else

61
Q

Explain Mead’s theory about how we interpret other people’s interactions

A

Taking the role of the other
- We interpret other’s meanings by taking the role of the other – putting ourselves in the place of the other person and
seeing ourselves as they see us
- Our ability to take the role of the other develops through social interaction
e.g we first do this as young children through imitative play when we take on the role of significant others, such as parents and learn to see ourselves as they see us
- We come to see ourselves from their point of view and from the point of view of the wider community – the generalised other (LINK TO SOCIALISATION)
- To function as members of society, we need the ability to see ourselves as others see us.
Through shared symbols, especially language, we become conscious of the ways of acting that others require of us (LINK TO FUNCTIONALISM – allows for collective consciousness, value consensus and solidarity

62
Q

Explain Blumer’s 3 key principles about how we give meanings to things

A

Blumer identified 3 key principles:

  • Our actions are based on the meanings we give to situations, events, people etc. Unlike animals, our actions are not based on automatic responses to stimuli
  • The meanings we give are not fixed at the outset of the interaction, but are negotiable and changeable to some extent
  • The meanings we give to situations are the result of the interpretive procedures we use –especially taking the role of the other
  • Blumer argues that although our action is partly predictable because we internalise the expectations of others, it is not completely fixed. There is always some room for negotiation and choice in how we perform our roles – even where very strict rules prevail, as in total institutions such as prisons (link to Goffman)
63
Q

Explain Goffman’s dramturgical model

A

Goffman: describes how we actively construct our ‘self’ by manipulating other people’s impressions of us.
- We are all ‘actors’ acting out ‘scripts’ using ‘props’ resting ‘backstage’ between ‘performances’ we present to our ‘audiences’ and so on
- Our aim is to carry off a convincing performance of the role we have adopted – just as the actor aims to persuade the audience that he is really Hamlet

64
Q

Explain what Goffman means by impression management

A

Impression management
- We must control the impression our performance gives. This involves constantly studying our audience to see how they are responding, and monitoring and adjusting our performance to present a convincing image
- We have many techniques for impression management; language,
tone of voice, gestures, and facial expressions, as well as props and settings such as dress, make-up
As in the theatre, there is a ‘front’ or stage where we act out our roles, while backstage, we can step out of our role and be ourselves

65
Q

Explain what Goffman argued about the roles we play within society

A

Roles
- Goffman argues there is a gap or role distance between our real
selves and our roles. Roles are only loosely scripted by society and we have a good deal of freedom in how we play them – e.g. some teachers are strict, and some are easy going.
* Link to crime and w/c – some turn to crime due to frustration but others continue to obey – FREEDOM AND FREE WILL
- Role distance also suggests that we do not always believe in the role we play and that our role performance may be cynical or calculating – the actor sometimes resembles a confidence trickster, manipulating his audience in accepting an impression that conceals his
true self and real motives

66
Q

Explain evaluations for symbolic interactionism

A
  • EV** (P)**: Interactionism largely avoids the determinism of structural theories it recognises that people create society through their choices and meanings – we create our own worldview (postmodernism)
  • EV (N): It is more a loose collection of descriptive concepts than an explanatory theory
  • EV** (N)**: Focuses on face-to-face interactions and ignores wider social structures such as class inequality
  • EV (N): Fails to explain the origin of labels. It cannot explain the consistent patterns we observe in people’s behaviour
  • EV (N): Reynolds (interactionism lacks structure) sent a questionnaire to 124 interactionists, 84 responded, concepts they felt were essential, the most popular were – role, self, and interaction. Only two chose power or class – concept that structural sociologists see as crucial
  • EV** (N)**: Not all action is meaningful – like Weber’s category of traditional action, much is performed unconsciously or routinely and may have little meaning for actors – interactionism lacks the
    means to explain it
  • EV (N): Goffman’s dramaturgical mode; interactions are often improvised and unrehearsed – it is about reactions and understanding the meanings of what is being said and gestures
  • EV (N): Ethnomethodology argue that interactionism is correct in focusing on actors’ meanings but that it fails to explain how actors create meaning
67
Q

Explain the key details of phenomenology

A
  • The term ‘phenomenon’ is used to describe things as they appear to our sense.
  • Some philosophers argue that we can** never have definite knowledge of what the world outside our minds is really like ‘in itself**’ – all we can know is what our senses tell us about it
  • Husserl – argues that the world only makes sense because we impose meaning and order on it by constructing mental categories that we use to classify and ‘file’ information coming from our
    senses
    E.g. a category such as four-legged furniture for eating off’ enables us to identify a particular set of sensory data as ‘table’
  • We can only obtain knowledge about the world through our mental acts of categorising and giving meaning to our experiences
  • The world as we know it is, and can only be, a product of our society
68
Q

Explain Schutz’s phenomenological theory and what he argues about typifications

A

Schutz’s phenomenological theory; argues that the categories and concepts we use are not unique to ourselves – rather, we share them with other members of the society
Typifications
- Schutz calls these shared categories typifications; enable us to organise our experiences into a shared world of meaning
- The meaning of any given experience varies according to its social context
- Meanings are potentially unclear and unstable – especially, if others classify the action in a different way from oneself
- Typifications stabilise and clarify meanings by ensuring that we are all ‘speaking the same language’ – all agreeing on the meaning of things.
- This makes it possible for us to communicate and cooperate with one another and thus to achieve our goals. Without shared typifications, social order would become impossible
- Members of society to a large extent to have a shared ‘life world’ – a stock of shared typifications that we use to make sense of our experience
- Schutz calls this ^^** ‘recipe knowledge’**: like a recipe, we can follow it without thinking too much and still get the desired results in everyday life
- Husserl: the world for him is as we know it can only be a product of our mind
- Schutz: the social world is shared, inter-subjective world that can only exist when we share the same meanings

69
Q

Explain what Schutz argues about ‘The Natural Attitude’ and why Berger and Luckmann disagree with this

A

The Natural Attitude
- Society appears to us as real, objective existing outside of us
- Schutz: uses example of posting a letter to a bookshop to order a book. We assume that some unknown and unseen individuals (postal workers, bookshop owner) will perform a whole series of operations and that all this will result in our receiving the book.
- The fact that we do get the book encourages us to adopt what he calls ‘the natural attitude’ – it leads us to assume that the social world is a solid, natural thing out there.
- HOWEVER, for Schutz it simply shows that all those involved share the same meanings, and this allows us to cooperate and achieve goals

Berger and Luckmann: while Schutz is right to focus on shared common-sense knowledge, they** reject the view that society is merely an inter-subjective reality**. Reality is socially constructed, once it has been constructed, it takes on a life of its own and becomes an
external reality that reacts back on us
E.g. religious ideas may start off in our consciousness, but they become embodied in powerful structures such as churches, which then constrain us – by influencing laws about our sexual relationships

70
Q

Explain the key details of Ethnomethodology

A

Emerged from Garfinkel. His ideas stem from phenomenology, but he rejects the idea of society as a real objective structure ‘out there
- Garfinkel is interested in how social order is achieved. Social order is created from the bottom- up. Order and meaning are not achieved because people are ‘puppets’ whose strings are pulled by the social system
- Social order is an accomplishment – something that** members of society actively construct in everyday life **using their common-sense knowledge
- Ethnomethodology is interested in the methods or rules that we use to produce the meanings in the first place

71
Q

Explain what Garfinkel means by indexicality and reflexivity

A

Indexicality and reflexivity
- Sees meanings as always potentially unclear **
- Nothing has a fixed meaning; everything depends on the context
- Indexicality; is clearly a threat to social order because if meanings are
inherently unclear or unstable, communication and cooperation become difficult and social relationships may begin to break down (anomie; normlessness)
- Indexicality suggests that we cannot take any meaning for granted as fixed or clear – yet in everyday life, this is exactly what we do most of the time
- What enables us to behave as if meanings are clear and obvious are reflexivity; refers to the fact that we use
common-sense knowledge in everyday interactions** to construct a sense of meaning and order and stop indexicality from occurring – similar to Schutz’s idea of typifications

72
Q

Explain how Garfinkel used experiments to test the existance of social order

A

Experiments in Disrupting Social Order
- Garfinkel; conducted ‘breaching experiments’ e.g. they acted as lodgers in their own families – being polite, avoiding getting
personal etc.
- ^^Aim was to disrupt people’s sense of order and challenge their reflexivity by undermining their assumptions about the situation
- Garfinkel: concludes that by challenging people’s taken for granted assumptions, the experiments show how t
he orderliness of everyday situations is not inevitable
but is actually an accomplishment of those who take part in them
- ^^Social order is participant produced by members themselves

73
Q

1.

Explain Garfinkel’s theories about suicide and reflexivity

A

Suicide and reflexivity
- Garfinkel is interested in the methods we use to achieve reflexivity; to make sense of the world
- Suicide: coroners make sense of deaths by selecting particular features from the infinite number of possible ‘facts’ about the deceased e.g. mental health. They then treat these features
as a real pattern e.g. they may use this information to conclude that ‘typical suicides’ are mentally ill
- Garfinkel: humans constantly strive to impose order by seeking patterns (cause and effect of positivity – functionalism)
e.g. patterns that suicides are mentally ill becomes part of the coroner’s taken for granted knowledge about what suicides are like
- When faced with future cases with similar features, the coroner interprets them as an example of the** assumed pattern (the assumed patterns become self-reinforcing, but it tells us nothing about any external reality)
- Garfinkel is critical of conventional sociology – accuses it of merely using the same methods as ordinary members of society to create order and meaning
- E.G. positivists such as Durkheim take it for granted tha
t official suicide statistics are social facts** that tell us the real rate of suicide. They are merely the decisions made by coroners, using their
common-sense understanding of what types of people kill themselves; no more than an elaborate version of the coroners’ common-sense understandings

74
Q

Explain evalutions of ethnomethodology

A
  • EV (P): Draws attention to how we actively construct order and meaning, rather than seeing us as simply puppets of the social system, as functionalism does
  • EV (N): Craib: argues that its findings are trivial; Ethnomethodology seem to spend a lot of time** ‘uncovering’ taken-for-granted rules **that turn out to be no surprise to anyone e.g. one study found that in phone conversations, generally only one person speaks at a time
  • EV** (N): EM argues that everyone creates order and meaning by identifying patterns and producing explanations that are essentially fictions. If so, this must also apply to EM itself, and so we have no particular reason to accept its view**
  • EV** (N)**: EM denies the existence of wider society, seeing it as merely a shared fiction. Yet, by analysing how members apply general rules or norms to specific contexts, it assumes that a structure of norms really exists beyond these contexts. From a functionalist perspective, such norms are social facts, not fiction
  • EV(N): EM ignores how wider structures of power and inequality affect the meanings that individuals construct e.g. Marxists argue that common-sense knowledge is really just ruling class ideology, and the order it creates serves to maintain capitalism – false consciousness and
    distorts reality
75
Q

Explain Giddens structuration theory

A
  • Giddens: there is a** duality of structure**. Structure and action are two sides of the same coin; neither can exist without the other
  • Through our actions we produce and reproduce structures
    over time and space
    , while these structures are what makes our actions possible in the first place – structuration
  • Giddens illustrates this with language – language is a structure; it is made up of a set of rules of grammar that govern how we can use it to express meanings. This structure seems to** exist independently of any individual, and it constrains out behaviour**
    E.G. if we wish to use a language to communicate, we must obey its rules, otherwise, we will not be understood
  • **BUT structure also depends on actions **e.g. a language would not exist if no one used it. It is produced and reproduced over time through the actions of individuals speaking and writing it – these actions can also change the structure. People give words new meanings and
    create new rules
76
Q

Explain what Giddens argued about how humans reproduce the strcuture society through agency

A

Reproduction of structures through agency
Giddens: structure has two elements:

  • Rules – the norms, customs and laws that govern or affect action
  • Resources – both economic and power over others
  • Rules and resources can be either reproduced or changed through human action e.g. obeying the law reproduced the existing structure, while inventing new technology may change it
    Reproducing them:
    1. Society’s rules contain a** stock knowledge about how to live our lives. Earning a living, shoppingapply to this knowledge to everyday situations
    2. We reproduce existing structures through our action **because we have a deep-seated need for ontological security
    ; a need that it is orderly, stable and predictable (tend to encourage
    action and that maintains existing structures, rather than changing them)
77
Q

Explain what Giddens argued about how humans change the strcuture society through agency

A

Change of structures through agency
1. We** ‘reflexively monitor’ our own action. We constantly reflect on our actions and their results, and we can deliberately choose a new course of action. Tradition no longer dictates action** and where individuals become more reflexive; e.g increasing inclusivity and reducing discrimination CIVIL RIGHTS
2. Our actions may change the world, but not always as we intended. They may have unintended consequences, producing changes that were not part of our goal (E.g. technological innovations and scientific discoveries – science useful when it comes to IVF also led to **nuclear weapons **

78
Q

Explain evaluations of Giddens Structuration theory

A

Evaluation

  • EV: Giddens makes an important attempt to overcome the division between structure and action in sociological theory
  • EV: Archer argues that he underestimates the capacity of actors to change structures to resist change e.g. slaves may wish to abolish slavery but lack the power to do so – **power and inequality **is important tobacknowledge
  • EV: Craib: structuration theory is not really a theory at all, because it** does not explain what actually happens in society**. Just describes the kinds of things we will find when we study society, such as actions, rules, resources etc.
  • EV: Craib: Giddens fails to explain how his theory applies to** large-scale structures such as the economy + the state**
79
Q

Explain what post-modernism argues and its viewpoint of the world

A
  • Postmodernists suggest society has become much more fragmented and individuals aren’t so connected to societal norms due to an increase in choice:
  • Individuals are** no longer seen as producers of goods but as consumers**
  • Increase in **secularization and distrust of social institutions **has given people more choice
  • Lyotard believes that there’s been a rejection of metanarratives; people now draw their own conclusions from multiple sources
  • Growth of ‘fake news’ means that what people perceive as** real may be wrong**
  • The** secularization of society and the increase in science** as the main belief system have led to a** lack of faith in institutions**;
    Science has led to further environmental issues and aided capitalists in creating inequality, Lyotard argues this is why nuclear weapons have been developed but **cancer hasn’t been cured yet **
  • **Increased diversity due to globalization has led to a rejection of mass culture **
  • Growth in individualism has meant that** culture is no longer a homogeneous entity **but instead a ‘pick and mix’
  • Relativist position; No one has special access to the truth – including sociologists. All accounts of reality are equally valid
80
Q

Explain Baudrillard’s theories about hyper-reality

A

Baudrillard:

  • People respond to** media images**, not people or places, eg when important/figures die, there is an outpouring of grief, but people aren’t mourning a real person just the idea of them
  • It is no longer possible to separate out reality from representation, thus leading to the creation of ‘hyperreality’, the combination of the two
  • Symbols are perceived as more important than real things, brands and designer labels portray an image that isn’t real; proliferation of signs and symbols as so extensive that reality becomes confused with fiction. The** images are everything, the reality nothing**: a condition called the simulacrum
  • Hyper-reality = distortion of what’s real in mass culture, in social media, adverts etc
81
Q

Explain what Strinati and Foucault argued about media saturation and conformity within society

A

Strinati:
* Increase in new media has created an** overload of information** that people are **unable to process; media saturation **
* Impact on cultural norms*, individual’s sense of identity and perceptions of society; far-ranging impacts on politics, religion, education, healthcare etc

Foucault:
* Concept of the panopticon, a prison design where inmates are constantly surveilled from a central point
* He applied this to broader social contexts, where people behave as if they’re being **watched, leading to self-regulation and conformity within society
**

82
Q

Explain evaluations of postmoderism

A

Evaluations:

** Ignores power and inequality** and the bourgeoisie’s control over institutions such as the** media and healthcare**
Hypodermic-Syringe Model; states that the mass media has a direct, immediate, and powerful effect on their audiences
The media** “injects” ideas, attitudes, and behaviours into the minds of individuals, who passively accept and absorb them without question
* EV: Philo and Miller (Marxist perspective) – it ignores power and inequality **e.g. the idea that **media images are unconnected with reality ignores the ruling class’ use of the media as a tool of domination (
ALTHUSSER – MEDIA IS AN ISA**)
EV: postmodernists are wrong to claim that people cannot distinguish between reality and media image (LINK Gramsci – class consciousness, aware of exploitation)
EV: Lyotard’s theory is self-defeating: why should we believe a theory that claims that no theory has the truth? – meta-narrative itself

83
Q

Explain what late moderism argues and its viewpoint of the world

A

Late modernism:
* Late modernity refers to an** era of change between the modern and postmodern era, created by Giddens**
* introduction of** risk within society as the death of old certainties such as job security leave **
* Liquid modernity refers to an era of fluidity, flexibility and change - Bauman
* Individualisation; people have become** less community-minded and more focused on their individual goals, needs and aspirations at the expense of family and others
* Increased insecurity within relationships **(increased divorce
), employment, science, etc)
* Reflexivity, people are much **more likely to question their place within society **as a result of increasing changes due to globalization e.g **use of AI **
* Disembedding; the lifting out of social relation from local contexts of interaction. Today we no longer need face-to-face contact in order to interact – disembedding breaks down geographical barriers and makes **interaction more impersonal **
* Increased interconnectedness through social media and technology, though their often impersonal and the increased surveillance of people

84
Q

Explain what Giddens argues about how late modern society and changes in romantic love + relationships

A

Giddens:
* Romantic love is the idealization of people being fulfilled and eternally happy through** falling in love; caused the idea of ‘till death do us part’**
* Increase in reflexivity, the ability of an individual to reflect on their actions and have a desire for self-improvement
Compartmentalize elements of their lives; people have begun to see that there is more to life than family etc
Led to the idea of plastic sexuality; the removal of the function of child-bearing from sex, leading to increased choice and diversity in sexual partners **
* Romantic love has now been replaced by confluent love, as love has become much more transactional and only exists when it benefits the individual; prompting an increase in serial monogamy to satisfy individual desires **
* Social pressure to have a
‘perfect’ relationship
has meant that people choose their own identity and what they desire from a relationship thus impacting the** longevity of relationships **
* There is a ‘duality of structure’- people are not just** ‘free’ to do whatever they want **– their freedom comes from existing structures

85
Q

Explain what Beck argues about cosmopolitiansim and globalisation with late modern society

A

Beck:
* Beck’s central concept is the “risk society,” where modernity is characterized by the prevalence of manufactured risks and uncertainties
* Industrialization and technological advancements have led to new and unforeseen risks, such as environmental pollution and nuclear disasters

Cosmopolitanism and Globalisation:
* Beck highlights the emergence of a cosmopolitan outlook, where individuals are increasingly connected beyond national boundaries
* Global challenges like climate change and economic interdependence require collective action on a global scale

Detraditionalization and Institutional Change:
* Beck discusses how** traditional institutions lose their influence**, and individuals become responsible for constructing their own life paths. Detraditionalization leads to the renegotiation of social roles and relationships
* This means we must constantly take account of the risks attached to the different courses of action open to us – **reflexive modernisation **

86
Q

Explain what Bauman argues about inequality and risk within late modern society

A

Bauman:

  • Inequality: Bauman highlights the persistence of inequality in late modern society, with some individuals benefiting from **flexibility and choice **while others are left vulnerable and marginalized
    Individualization of Risk: Late modernism also emphasizes the individualization of risk, where individuals are responsible for managing risks such as job insecurity, health, and financial stability
  • Liquid Modern Ethics: Bauman raises questions about the ethical implications of living in a liquid modern society, where** moral values and norms are constantly shifting and evolving**
87
Q

Explain evalutions of late moderism

A

Evaluations:
Hypodermic syringe model: the audience is viewed as** passive recipients of media messages, and the media is believed to have the power to shape individuals’ thoughts, beliefs, and behaviours without any resistance or critical thinking** on the part of the audience
* Definitions of class may have slightly changed, but there’s still a polarization of views that exemplify structural forces of society
* Modernity is just a Western ideal as opposed to a global one, as other societies have rejected it
* Elliot is critical of media usage outside of the West; where there may be a lack of digital technologies
* The risk and insecurity is due to capitalism and perhaps not social change; EV: Rustin: it is capitalism, with its pursuit of profit at all costs, that is the source of risk, not technology as such. (LINK to state crimes like greed, selfishness, and competitiom

88
Q

Explain what positivist believe about whether sociology is a science

A

Positivists believe that it is possible and desirable to apply the logic and methods of the natural science to the study of society – doing so will bring us true,** objective knowledge**
* Believe that reality exists outside and independently
of the human mind

* Society is an objective factual reality – it is a **real ‘thing’ made up of social facts **that exists ‘out there’, independently of individuals, just like the physical world

89
Q

Explain what positivists argue about patterns, laws and verificationism

A

Patterns, laws, and inductive reasoning
- Reality is not random or chaotic but patterned, and we can observe these empirical patterns or regularities. It is the job of science to observe, identify, measure, and record these patterns systematically (laboratory experiments)
- Positivists believe that ‘real laws are discoverable’ that will explain these patterns through** inductive reasoning**
- Induction involves** accumulating data** about the world through careful observation and measurement

Verificationism
- Can develop a theory that explains all our observations so far, after many more observations have confirmed or verified the theory, we can claim to have discovered the truth in the form of a general laws
- The patterns we observe, whether in nature or in society, can all be explained in the same way – by finding the** facts that cause them **

90
Q

Explain what positivists argue about objective quantitative research

A

Objective quantitative research
- Positivists believe that as far as possible sociology should take the experimental method used in the natural sciences, since this allows the** investigator to test a hypothesis in the most
systematic and controlled way**
- Experiments involve examining each possible causal factor to observe its effect, while simultaneously** excluding all other factors**
- Positivists use quantitative data to uncover and measure patterns of behaviour – allows them to produce mathematically precise statements about the relationship between the facts they are investigating
- Positivists believe that researchers should be detached and objective; through methods like quantitative methods such as experiments, questionnaires, structured interviews structured
non-participant observation and official statistics
- These methods** produce reliable data **that can be checked by other researchers repeating the
research
EV: These methods decrease validity!!

91
Q

Explain how Durkehim studied suicide, how positivism influenced him and evaluate the study

A

Positivism and suicide
- Believed that if he could show that even such a highly individual act had social causes, this would establish sociology’s status as a distinct and genuinely scientific discipline
- Durkheim observed that there were patterns in the suicide rate e.g. rates for Protestants were higher than Catholics
- Concluded that these patterns could not be the product of the motives of individuals, but were social facts – they must be caused by other social facts
- Durkheim claimed to have discovered a
‘real law’ that different levels of integration and regulation
produce different rates of suicide

EV: Durkheim boxed his reasons up, not allowing free will but also allowed his bias to overtake his judgement and thereby, making his research subjective

92
Q

Explain what interpretivists believe about whether sociology is a science

A

Interpretivist sociologists do not believe that sociology should model itself on the natural sciences
- Interpretivists** criticise positivism’s scientific approach as inadequate or even as completely unsuited** to the study of human beings
- WEBER: we should try to understand (verstehen) human behaviour by putting ourselves in the shoes of those we are studying and focusing on interpreting the meanings behind people’s
action
- HOWEVER, this approach still stresses the importance of adopting a rigorous and systematic approach, stressing that making sense of** human behaviour derives from a careful interpretation**
of it – hence this alternative approach is known an interpretivism

93
Q

Explain what positivists argue about verstehan and why it’s important in research

A

Verstehen and qualitative research
- **Interpretivists reject the logic and methods **of the natural sciences
- To discover meanings people, give to their actions, we need to see the world from their viewpoint; involves abandoning the detachment and objectivity favoured by positivists, should use verstehen to grasp their meanings
- These methods produce **richer, more personal data high in validity **and give the sociologist a **subjective understanding of the actor’s meanings **

94
Q

Explain how Douglas and Atkinson studied suicide, how interpretivism influenced them and how they disagree with Durkheim’s study

A

Douglas – individuals have free will and they choose how to act on the basis of meanings. To understand suicide, we must uncover its meanings for those involved, instead of imposing our own meanings – like Durkheim’s 4 types of suicide
- Douglas also rejects Durkheim’s quantitative data from official statistics – there are no objective facts but simply** social constructions** resulting from the way coroners** label certain deaths as suicide.
- Douglas proposes we use qualitative data from case studies of suicides
- Atkinson
rejects the idea that external social facts determine behaviour and agrees that statistics
are socially constructed. He argues that we can never know the ‘
real state’ of suicide**, even using qualitative methods, since we can never know for sure what meanings the deceased held

95
Q

Explain what postmoderism and feminism argue about whether or not sociology is a science

A

Argue** against the idea of a scientific sociology. They regard natural science as simply a meta-narrative
- Despite its claim to have special access to the truth, science is just one more ‘big story’; its account of the world is
no more valid than any other **
- Given the postmodernist view that there are so many different truths as there are points of view, a scientific approach is dangerous because it claims a monopoly of the truth and so** excludes other points of view**
- Some feminists, notably poststructuralist feminists, share this view of scientific sociology
the quest for a single, scientific feminist theory is a form of domination, since it covertly excludes many groups of women.Other feminists argue that the quantitative scientific methods favoured by positivists are also oppressive and cannot capture the reality of women’s experiences
- Science is an undesirable model for sociology to follow because, in practice, science has not always led to the progress that positivists believed it would E.G. the emergence of ‘risk society’,

96
Q

Explain Popper’s argument about ‘the fallacy of induction’

A
  • Popper: the main reason why we should reject Verificationism is what he calls** ‘the fallacy of
    induction’ **– induction is the process of moving from the observation of particular instances of
    something to arrive at a general statement or law
  • A generalised statement can be disproved by one obervation of it being false
  • WE CAN** NEVER prove a theory is true simply by producing more observations that support or
    verify it**
97
Q

Explain the hypothetico-deductive method argued by Popper

A
  • Popper believed that sociology could be viewed as a science provided it subjected itself to continual testing or falsification. Sociology can proceed just like a natural science, by using the hypothetico-deductive method
    Social Phenoma - Systematic Observation - Confirm Hypothesis
    \/ \/
    Hypothesis - Data Collection + Anaylsis \/
    |
    Refute Hypothesis Establish Theory
    |
    Revise Hypothesis
98
Q

Explain Popper’s arguments about falsification and what a scientific and good theory must have

A
  • A **scientific statement **is one that in principle is capable of being falsified – proved wrong by the evidence
  • We must be able to say what **evidence would count as falsifying the statement when we come to
    put it to the test **

Popper argues that agood theory has two features:

  • It is in principle falsifiable but when tested, stands up to all attempts to disprove it
  • It is bold – it claims to explain a great deal. It makes big generalisations that precisely predict a large number of cases or events, and so is at **greater risk of being falsified **than a timid theory that only tries to explain a small number of events
  • For a theory to be** falsifiable, it must be open to criticism from other scientists**
  • Popper: science is essentially a public activity. Everything is open to criticism, so that the flaws in a theory can be readily exposed and better theories developed
99
Q

Explain what Popper argues about whether sociology is a science

A

Implications of Sociology
* Popper: believes that much sociology is unscientific because it consists of theories that cannot
be put to the test with the possibility that they might be falsified

- E.G. Marxism predicts that there will be a** revolution leading to a classless society**, but that it has not yet happened because of the false consciousness of the proletariat. The prediction cannot
be falsified
. If there is a revolution, Marxism is correct and if there is not a revolution Marxism is still correct

  • Popper: believes that sociology can be scientific, because it is capable of producing hypotheses that can in principle be falsified E.G. Ford – hypothesised that comprehensive
    schooling would produce social mixing of pupils
    from different social classes – she was able to test and falsify this hypothesis through her empirical research
100
Q

Explain Kuhn’s argument about whether sociology can be a science or not

A
  • Scientists work within paradigms; frameworks of scientific laws, concepts, theories, methods and assumptions
  • Scientists** rarely question the paradigm + are blinded to any contradictions in investigations by the paradigm** – any anomalies cause work to be scrutinised for errors
  • When many anomalies exist in the paradigm a scientific revolution happens and the original paradigm is replaced with a new one
  • Sociology cannot be a science as it is preparadignamic – there is no one set paradigm, rather a set of competing theories
101
Q

Explain what Realism and specifically Keat + Urry argue about whether sociology can be a science

A
  • Realists = both natural and social science attempt to explain the causes of events in terms of underlying structures and processes. Although these structures are often unobservable, we can work out that they exist by observing their effects E.G. we cannot directly see a thing called ‘social class’, but we can observe its effects on people’s life chances
  • Closed systems: those where the researcher can control and measure all the relevant variables, and therefore can make** precise predictions**
  • Open systems: those where the researcher cannot control and measure all the relevant variables and cannot make precise predictions
  • Realists argue that **sociologist’s study open systems where the processes are too complex to make exact predictions **
  • Realists believe that a structured reality exists but, unlike positivists,** disagree that this reality is necessarily observable directly**
  • Realists believe that interpretivists are also wrong in assuming that sociology cannot be scientific. Interpretivists believe that minds are not directly observable so they cannot be studied scientifically. Realists argue that science can study unobservable phenomena, then this is **no barrier to studying meanings
    scientifically*
102
Q

Explain the Functionalist viewpoint on how sociologists should influence social policy and evaluate it

A

Positivism and Functionalism

  • Durkheim took the view that **sociology was a science **and would discover both the cause of social problems and scientifically based solution to them
  • e.g Durkheim’s analysis led him to propose a meritocratic education system + the abolition of inherited wealth to foster a sense that society was fair, which would promote **social cohesion **
  • These policies help society run smoothly and efficiently
  • e.g educational policies are seen as promoting equal opportunity + social integration, while health and housing policies assist the family in performing its functions more efficiently
  • Sociologists role is to provide the state with objective, scientific information
  • Functionalists favour social policies that are sometimes referred to as ‘piecemeal social engineering’ – they favour a **cautious approach, tackling one specific issue at a time **

EV: the piecemeal approach has been criticised – Marxists argue that educational policies aimed at equal opportunity for children of different classes are often defeated by influence of poverty in wider society – social problems such as under-achievement are simply aspects of a wider structure of class inequality

102
Q

Explain the Social Democractic viewpoint on how sociologists should influence social policy and evaluate it

A

Social Democratic Perspective
* Favours a major redistribution of wealth and income from the rich to the poor
* Townsend, argue that they should be involved in researching social problems and making policy recommendations to eradicate them
E.G. Townsend conducted extensive research on** poverty**. He made recommendations for policies such as **fairer, higher benefit levels, and more public spending on health, education, and welfare services **
* Black Report on **class inequalities in health **made 37 recommendation; free school meals for all children, improved working conditions, better benefits for the disabled and more spending to improve housing. The Labour government had originally commissioned the report in 1977 but it was only completed in 1980, the year after Thatcher’s conservative government came to power. The new government refused to implement the report’s recommendations on grounds of cost, and even tried to **restrict its publication **

EV: Marxists
* Reject the idea that even policies as far-reaching as those proposed by the Black Report are enough to solve the problem. It is capitalism that is ultimately responsible for these inequalities and so the problem cannot be solved without abolishing capitalism
* The capitalist state is unlikely to introduce costly public spending policies to benefit the working class

EV: Postmodernists
* Criticise attempts by sociologists to influence policy. It is impossible to** discover objective truth**
* All knowledge produced by research is uncertain, and so sociological findings cannot provide a satisfactory basis for policymaking
* Sociologists can only take the role of ‘interpreters’, offering one view of reality among many, and not the** role of ‘legislators’, as modernist sociologists** such as functionalists and social democrats may have tried – meta-narratives

103
Q

Explain the Marxist viewpoint on how sociologists should influence social policy and evaluate it

A
  • Society as divided by a fundamental **conflict of interest in which the ruling capitalist class exploit the labour of the working class **– proletariat vs bourgeoisie
  • **Don’t see social policies **as benefiting all members of society, the state represents the ruling class, and its social policies serve the interests of capitalism
  • Provide ideological legitimation: to mask capitalist exploitation. e.g gives capitalism a ‘caring face’ (Pearce)
  • Maintain the labour force for further exploitation: e.g. the NHS serves capitalism by keeping** working fit enough to work** - preventing revolution
  • Marxists recognise that social policies do sometimes provide real, if limited, benefits to the working-class – such gains ae constantly threatened with reversal by capitalism’s tendency to go into periodic crises of profitability - leading to** cuts in state spending on welfare**

Role of Sociologists
* Sociologist’s main role should be to **criticise capitalist social policy, not to serve the capitalist state **

EV: Critics argue that Marxist views on social policy and the role of sociologists are** impractical and unrealistic**
EV: Social Democrats criticise them for rejecting the idea that sociological research can help bring about progressive policies within the existing capitalist system e.g. poverty researchers have at times had some positive impact on policy

104
Q

Explain the Feminist viewpoint on how sociologists should influence social policy and evaluate it

A
  • Society is patriarchal, benefiting men at women’s expense, and the state perpetuates women’s subordination through its social policies
    E.G. Family policies may assume that the** ‘normal’ family is a conventional nuclear family.** State assumes this and offers benefits to married couples but not to cohabitating ones

Feminist research has had an impact in a number of policy areas e.g. in education, it has influences policies such as:
1. Learning materials: that promote more positive images of females – **GIST, WISE, remaking the curriculum and textbooks focused on strong, independent, business led women who are successful
2. Teacher training: to sensitise teachers to the need to avoid gender bias and promote inclusiveness for both sexes
3. Women’s refuges for women escaping domestic violence (
CHISWICK 1971**) e.g. the Women’s Aid Federation supports a national network of over **500 such services, often with funding from local and central government **

EV: Many feminists reject the view that reformist social policies can liberate women e.g both Marxist and radical feminists call for more far-reaching changes that the existing state cannot deliver

105
Q

Explain the New Right viewpoint on how sociologists should influence social policy and evaluate it

A
  • Believe that the state should have only minimal involvement in society - opposed to using state provision of welfare to deal with social problems
  • State interventions rob people of their freedom to make their own choices and undermines their sense of responsibility – leads to greater social problems, such as crime and delinquency

MURRAY: generous welfare benefits and council housing for lone parents act as ‘perverse incentives’ that weaken the family’s self-reliance. Encourages the **growth of the dependency culture **

  • Role of sociologists as being to propose alternative policies to the present ones. These policies should aim to restore individuals’ responsibility for their own and their families’ welfare, rather than leaving this to the state – lassaire faire

E.G. Breakdown Britain, a report by Conservative think tank, the Social Justice Policy Group, proposes include marriage preparation and parenting classes + support from the tax and benefit system for mothers who stay at home. Report argues the** governments have stripped citizens of responsibility** for their own welfare and neglected.

New Right Influence on Social Policy
* New Right support a strong ‘law and order’ policy and research by right realist criminologists, such as **Wilson and Kelling ‘Broken Windows Theory’ **– influential in the widespread introduction of **zero-tolerance policies **

EV: SOCIAL CONTROL EVIDENT (FOUCAULT) – SUPER-PANOPTICON
EV: Quality and the objectivity of the social research, used by the New Right have been questioned E.G. the validity of the data on which Murray based his claims about a link between absent fathers and delinquency has been widely challenged
EV: Feminism + Foucault + Postmodernism reject social policies that go aganist the strict control that NR attempts to take over citizens - freewill is need and minorities should not be demonised, criminalised, and labelled – but helped and supported

106
Q

Explain the arguments about whether sociology should inform social policy based on different theories and evidence of how sociologists have influenced social policy

A
  • Social policy refers to the activities and legislative outcomes of central and local government and their agencies. They generally have some bearing on human welfare
    Social problems = Worsely - social behaviour that causes public friction or private misery + needs collective action to solve it
  • Consensus theorists: argue that sociology should underpin social policy and contribute to the reform of society
  • Critical theorists: critical of the relationship between sociology and social policy and argue that the role of sociology should be to bring about radical change rather than piecemeal reforms
  • Sociology is an academic subjects, its relationship to social policy should be independent - e.g Postmodernists argue that sociology has no contribution to make to social policy
  • Giddens: Sociology is to inform policy makers and assess the results of policy in order to promote an understanding of society
  • Worsley - sociology **isn’t always connected to social issues **+ can **exist without informing social policy **
  • Brewer -** sociology should address social problems + policies**
  • Townsend: work on poverty was responsible for social policies like the minimum wage and family and working tax credits
    Roberts: talks of a golden age in the 40s and 50s when sociologists actively supported reforms of the newly established welfare state
  • Sociology can claim some** credit for raising awareness about social problems **and instigating a social policy response from the government. e.g some feminists claim that raising awareness about gender inequality led to the Equal Pay Act and the Sex Discrimination Act
  • Others see social policy influenced primarily by other factors such as ideology, self-interest, and electoral popularity - it can be influenced by sociological research, but only when it suits and benefits central or local government
107
Q

Explain why sociology doesn’t always influence social policy

A
  • Clash of ideologies - critical ideologies (like Marxism) clash with more moderate + conservative ideologies
  • Costs - sociologists look at ideal solutions that may not be practical - Black Report’s recommendations weren’t implemented on the basis of being too expensive
  • Methoodolgoies - interprevist methods are often** too small-scale** to be implemented by governments who look at big impact policies
  • Think Tanks - government policy is often influenced by experts that propose ideas for social policy + they often have connections ot these ministers
  • Electoral popularity - research findings might point to a policy that would be unpleasant with voters
  • Impact of globalisation - role of international governmental organisations such as the World Bank + World Trade Organisaton influence social policy - especially on **social spending + the economy **
108
Q

Explain Comte + Durkheim’s beliefs about sociology as a science + its role due to their positvist beliefs

A
  • Comte + Durkheim, the creation of a better society was **not a matter of subjective values **or personal opinions about what was ‘best’
  • Sociology’s role as a science it should discover the truth about how society works, uncovering the laws that govern its proper functioning
  • Equipped with this knowledge, social problems could be solved and human life + improved
  • Scientific sociology would reveal the one correct society
  • Sociologists would be able to say objectively and with scientific certainty what was
    really best for society
    EV – Science caused biological differences and** Femininsts don’t believe that sociology can be a science**
    (KUHN – PARADIGM – **SOCIOLOGY WILL NEVER AGREE WITH EACH
    OTHER **– RAINBOW ALLIANCE)
109
Q

Explain Marx’s beliefs about sociology as a science + its role due to his positvist beliefs

A

Karl Marx
* Debate whether or not Marx was a positivist
* Saw himself as a scientist + believed his method of historical analysis, historical materialism - could reveal the line of development
of human society
(primitive communist)
* Development involved an evolution through a series of different types of class-based society, leading ultimately to a future classless communist society
* Role of Marx’s sociology was to reveal the truth of this development to the
proletariat, since they would be the **class to overthrown capitalism

110
Q

Explain Weber’s beliefs about sociology as a science + its role due to his positvist beliefs

A

Weber
* Makes a **sharp distinction between value judgements and facts **that he argues that we
cannot derive the one from the other
* There is nothing about the fact that logically compels us to accept the value
* Weber’s view a value can be neither proved nor disproved by the facts: they belong to
different realms
* Weber still saw an essential role for values in sociological research + divided his role into four research stages

111
Q

Explain how Weber divided the research process into four stages and how he believed sociologists should act in all 4 stages

A
  1. Values as a guide to research
    * **Social reality is made up of a ‘meaningless infinity’ of facts **that make it impossible to study it in its totality
    * Researchers can select certain facts + study these in regard as **important based on our own values **
    E.G. feminists value gender equality and this leads them to study women’s oppression and to develop concepts such as **patriarchy **
  2. Data collection and hypothesis training
    * Must be objective and unbiased as possible when we are actually collecting the facts, and this means keeping our values and prejudices out of the process
    E.G. we should **not ask leading questions **
  3. Values in the interpretation of data
    * Facts need to be set in a theoretical framework so that we can understand their significance and draw conclusions
    * Our choice of theoretical framework or perspective is **influenced by our values **- must be explicit about them, spelling out our **values so that others can see if unconscious bias is present **
  4. Values and the sociologist as a citizen
    * Weber argues that scientists and sociologists are also human beings and citizens + must not dodge the moral and political issues their work raises by hiding behind words such as **‘objectivity’ or ‘value freedom’ **
112
Q

Explain what committed sociologists argue about how sociologists objectivity and values should influence their research

A
  • Myrdal argues that sociologists should not only spell out their values, but they should
    also openly** ‘take sides’ by espousing the values and interests of particular individuals or groups**
  • It is neither possible nor desirable to keep values out of research
  • Gouldner: value-free sociology is impossible: because either the sociologist’s own values, or those of their funders,
    are bound to be reflected in their work
  • Undesirable: since without values to guide research, sociologists are merely putting their services at the disposal of the highest bidder
113
Q

Explain what positivists in the mid-50s belived about objectivity and values and how this influenced their work

A
  1. The desire to appear scientific
    * Sociologists should remain morally neutral – their job is simply to establish the
    truth about people’s behaviour
  2. The social position of sociology
    * Gouldner: argues that by the 50s, American sociologists in particular had become more ‘spiritless technicians’
    * Sociologists were** no longer ‘problem makers’ who defined their own research
    problems** - became ‘problem takers’ who hired themselves out to other organisations to take on
    and solve their problems for them – DO THEIR DIRTY WORK
    * By leaving their own values behind them, sociologists were making a
    ‘gentleman’s promise’ that they would not rock the boat by criticising or questioning their paymasters
114
Q

Explain how Feminists, Marxists and Functionalists view objectivty and values in practice

A
  • Feminism: sees society as based on** gender inequality and promotes the rights of
    women**
  • Functionalism: sees society as harmonious and espouses conservative values
    that favour the status quo
  • Marxism: sees society as conflict-ridden and strives for a classless society
115
Q

Explain how Relativism views the objectivity of sociologists in practice should work

A

Objectivity and relativism
* If all sociological perspectives involve values, are their findings just a** reflection of their
values**, rather than a true picture of society

Idea of Relativism: which argues that
there is** no absolute or objective truth, just truths plural**

  1. Different groups, cultures, and individuals – including sociologists – have different
    views as to what is true
    . Each one sees the world in their own distinctive way, through
    their** own perspectives, concepts, values, and interests**
  2. There is no independent way of judging whether any view is truer than any other
116
Q

Explain how Postmodernism views the objectivity of sociologists in practice should work

A

Postmodernists take a relativist view of knowledge
* Reject the idea that any one account of the** social world is superior to any other- there is no privileged account** that have special access to the truth
- Any perspective that claims to have the truth is just a meta-narrative
or ‘big story’

- All knowledge, from whatever perspective is based on** values and assumptions **

EV: If this is correct, then it must apply to postmodernism too – which leads to the paradoxical conclusion that we should not believe what postmodernism says either