Theories Of The Family Flashcards
The functionalist perspective on the family
Is seen as a strut all theory because it claims that social structures in society (e.g family, education, religion) perform a number of ‘functions’ which shape and influence our behaviour.
George Murdock
Studied 250 society’s and found some form of the nuclear family existing in all of them - he believe that it was universal to all societies
He then argued that the nuclear family was essential and further argued that in all society the nuclear family performed 4 key functions
4 key functions of the nuclear family
Sexual - stable stratification of the sex drive with the same partner, prevents social disruption caused by a sexual ‘free for all’
Economic - meets the members economic needs such as food shelter
Reproduction - it reproduces the next generation without which societ could not continue
Education - primary education of socialisation of the young into societies shared norms and values
Criticisms of Murdock
The nuclear family is not universal - such as Nayar tribes of India practised polyandry (multiple husbands)
Marxists and feminists reject the ‘rose tinted ‘ consensus view that the family meets the needs of tooth individuals members of the family and the needs of wider society
Feminist say the family serves the needs of men and oppress women
What is Parsons ‘functional fit’
As society changes, the type of family changes to fit in with society such as the extended family is more fit for traditional society and the nuclear is best suited for industrial society
Why is the nuclear family more suited for todays society?
As we live in an industrial society which means that the basic family type is smaller because the family has fewer functions or perform than the extend family in a traditional society so there has been a loss of functions.
E,g children go to school instead of being home schooled
A geographically mobile workforce
In traditional pre industrial society, people often spent their whole lives living in the same village however, in contrast in modern society , industries are constantly springing up. Which requires people to move around which parsons argued it is easier for the smaller nuclear family to do so.
A socially mobile workforce
Modern industrial society is based on constantly evolving science and technology so it requires a skilled workforce. In modern society, an individuals Staus is achieve by their own efforts and ability, not fixed at birth by their social and family background, and r this makes a socially mobilise workforce possible.
Loss of functions
The pre industrial family was a multi functional unit. For example it was both a unit of production in which family members worked together. According to parsons when society industrialises, the family not only changes structure from extended to nuclear it also loses many of its functions
Evaluation of functionalism
Being out of date - ignores family diversity
Ignoring the harmful effects on the family - parents aren’t always loving and supportive e.g abuse
Feminists - ignores the exploitation of women, gender roles are socially constructed not biological and usually involve the oppression of women
Downplaying conflict - plenty of children resit parental control and rebel, ignores the fact that children actively create their pr own personalities
The Marxist perspective on the family
Marxists sociologists see capitalist society as based on an unequal conflict between two social classes: the capitalist class, who own the means of production and the working class, whose labour the capitalist exploit for profit
How do Marxist see society’s institutions
See all society’s institutions, such as the education system, the media, religion and the state, along with the family, as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism
Marxist and the function of the family
For Marxists, the functions of the family are performed purely for the benefit of the capitalist system. This view contrasts sharply with the functionalist view that the family benefits both society as a while and all the individual members of the family. They have identified several functions that they see as fulling for capitalism.
Inheritance of property- Marxist function
Marxists argue that the key factor determining the shape of all social institutions, including the family, is the mode of production - that is, who owns and controls society’s productive forces (such as tools, machinery, raw materials, land and labour)
I’m modern society, it is the capitalist class that owns and controls theses means of production. As the mode of production evolved, so too does the family
Called the earliest, classless society, ‘primitive communism’. - in this society, there was no private property instead, all members of society owned the means of production communally
At this stage of social development, there was no family as such. Instead, there existed what friedrich engles called the ‘promiscuous horde’, or tribe, I’m which there were no restrictions on sexual relationships
Inheritance of property - private property
As forces of production developed, society’s wealth began to increase. Along with with increase wealth came the development of private property, as a class of men emerged who were able to secure control of the means of production. This change eventually brought about the patriarchal monogamous nuclear family.
Engles view on private property
Engles view, monogamy became essential because of the inheritance of private property- men had to be certain of the paternity of their children in order to ensure that their legitimate heirs inherited from them
In Engles view the rise of the monogamous nuclear family represented a ‘world historical defeat of the female sex’ this was because it brought the women sexuality under male control and turned her into ‘a mere instrument for the production of children’
Marxist view on private property
Marxists argue that only with the overthrow of capitalism and private ownership of the means of production will women achieve liberation from patriarchal control. A classless society will be established in which the means of production are owned collectively, not privately. There will no longer be a need for the patriarchal family, since there will be no need to have a means of transmitting private property down the generations
Criticisms of Engles
It is not clear that the ‘promiscuous horde’ ever really existed (Murdock found that the nuclear family was universal)
According to the functionalist Murdock, the nuclear family existed before capitalism in many areas
Feminists- this theory can’t explain why gender equality exists within the family.
Ideological functions
Marxist argue rear reg family today also performs key ideological functions for capitalism. By ‘ideology’, Marxists mean a set of ideas or beliefs that justify inequality and maintain the capitalist system by persuading people to accept it as fair, natural or unchangeable.
One way which the family does this if by socialising children into the idea that hierarchy and inequality are inevitable. Parental power over children accustoms them to the idea that there always has to be someone in charge and this prepares them for a working life in which they wiki accept orders from their capitalist employers.
Ideological functions - David cooper (1972)
The family acts as an ‘ideological conditioning device’
The Morden nuclear family functions to promote values and ways of thinking about capitalism that ensure the reproduction and maintenance of capitalism
It does this in three main ways:
1. Making us believe that hierarchy and inequality are Normal
2. Providing a ‘safe heaven’ for workers, giving them the illusion that they are in control of their lives
3. By promoting consumption, which keeps capitalism going.
Ideological functions- Eli Zaretsky (1976)
According to him, the family also perform an ideological function by offering an apparent ‘safe heaven’ from the harsh and exploitative world of capitalism outside, in which workers can ‘be themselves’ and have a private life. However, zaretsky argues that this is largely an illusion - the family cannot meet its members needs. For example, it is based on the domestic servitude of women.
- the nuclear family provided comfort to alienated workers which enabled them to keep working and without the idea of family at home it would not be motivating, workers would less likely put up with exportation in order to earn money
Althusser: the family as a ISA
Althusser argued that in order for capitalism to survive the working class must submit to the ruling class or bourgeoisie. He suggested that the family is one of the ISA along with education and media. Through socialisation in the family we come to accept and support capitalism.
Social policies made by capitalists are not to be trusted. They are in place to:
- keep the workers alive (NHS) so that they can work for capitalists
- to keep people quite and make them think capitalism has a caring face
- benefits keeps people in poverty
A unit of consumption
Capitalism exploits the labour of the workers, making a profit by selling the products of their labour. For more than it pays them to produce these commodities. The family therefore plays a major role in generating profits for capitalists, since it is an important market for the sale of consumer goods:
- the media target children, who use ‘pester power’ to persuade parents to spend more
- children who lack the latest clothes or ‘must have’ gadgets are mocked and stigmatised by their peers.
Thus, Marxists see the family as performing several functions that maintain capitalist society: the inheritance of private property, socialisation into acceptance or inequality, and a source of profits.
In the Marxist view, while these may benefit capitalism, they do not benefit members of the family
Criticisms of the Marxist perspective
- Marxists tend to assume that the nuclear family is dominate in capitalist society. This ignores the wide variety of family structures found in society today
- feminists argue that the Marxist emphasis on class and capitalism underestimates the importance or gender inequalities within the family. In the feminist view, these are more fundamental than class inequalities and the family primarily serves the interests of men, not capitalism
- functionalists argue that Marxists ignore the very real benefits that the family provides for its members