Education External Factors Flashcards
External factors
Theses are factors outside the educational system. Such as the influence of home and family background and wider society.
Cultural deprivation
Theories that suggest that the working class children lack the necessary economic capital and view, attitudes and support that are needed to succeed within education. As the middle class are a dominate social group.
Language code - Bernstein
Working class
Working class: the restricted code, short , often unfinished, grammatically simple sentences. Unpredictable and may involve only a single word.
Context bound: speaker assumes the listener shares the same experiences. Limited vocabulary
Language codes - Bernstein
Middle class
Middle class: the elaborated code typically used by the middle class. Wider vocabulary and more grammatically complex, more varied, abstract ideas, universal
Context free: speaker assumes they share the same experiences
How do different language codes lead to success or failure in education
- as formal education is carried out in elaborated codes, this means that those who use the restrictive codes are at a disadvantage e.g language of exams
- Bernstein believed the elaborated code to be superior to the restricted as it allows individuals to deal with higher learnt concepts.
- middle class socialised into the elaborated code at an early age so they are fluent when they arrive at school
Evaluations of language codes
- victim blaming exercise
- schools are able to accommodate all kinds of language codes
- students can switch between both codes when necessary an advantage as they can understand everyone
- there’s no expectation that all children can speak the elaborated code
Parents education in working class families
Cultural deprivation theorists argue that parents attitudes to education are a key factor effecting children’s achievement. E.g Douglas study in 1964 Fond that working class parents places less value on education, as a result they were less ambitious for their children gave them less encouragement and took less interest in their education which led to children having lower levels of motivation and achievement
Parents education in middle class families
Leon Feinstein (2008) argues that parents own education is the most important factor affecting children’s achievement and, since middle class parents tend to be better educated, they are also able to give their children the advantage by how to socialise them. Educated parents are more aware of what is needed to assist educational progress. More successful in establishing good relationships with teachers and recognise the educational value of activities like Museums
Parenting style middle class
Educated parents parenting style emphasises consistent discipline and high expectations of their children, and this supports achievement by encouraging active learning and exploration.
Parenting style in working class family
Less educated parents parenting style is marked by harsh or inconsistent discipline that emphasises ‘doing as you’re told’ or ‘behaving yourself ‘. This prevents the child from learning independence and self control, leading to poorer motivating at school and problems interacting with teachers.
Use of income on middle class family’s
Better education parents tend to have higher incomes and they also spend their income in ways that promote their children’s educational success e.g Bersten and Young (1967) found that middle class mothers are more likely to buy educational toys, books and activities. This encourages reading skills and stimulate intellectual development. They also have a better understanding of nutrition and it’s importance on child development and with a higher income they can buy more nutritious food.
Use of income in working class families
Working class homes are more likely to lack these recourses such as educational book and this means children from such homes start school without the intellectual skills needed to progress.
Class, income and parental education
Feinstein notes that parental education has an influence on children’s achievement in its own right, regardless of class or income. Even within a given social class, better educated parents tend to have children who are more successful at school.
What is working class subculture?
Cultural deprivation theorists argue that lack of parental interest in their education reflects the subcultural values of working class. A subculture is a groups whose attitudes and values differ from those of mainstream culture
Barry sugarman 1970 view on working class subculture
He argues that working class subculture has four key features that act as a barrier to educational achievement.
Barry sugarman four key features that act as barriers to to educational achievement
- Fatalism - the belief in fate and ‘whatever will be will be’ and there is nothing you can do to change your status. This contrast with middle class views where they emphasises that you can change your position through your own efforts
- Collectivism - valuing being part of a group more than succeeding as an individual. Whereas middle class view that an individual should not be held back by group loyalists
- Immediate gratification - seeking pleasure now rather than making sacrifices in order to get rewards in the future. By contrast, middle class values emphasise deferred gratification, making sacrifices now for greater rewards later.
- Present time orientation- seeing the present as more important than in the future and so not having long term goals or plans. By contrast, middle class culture has a future time orientation that sees planning for the future important.
Working class children in subculture
Working class children internalise the beliefs and values of their subculture through the socialisation process and this results in the, underachieving at school.
But why do these values exist?
Sugarman argues that they stem from the fact that middle class jobs are secure careers offering prospects for continuous individual advancement. This encourages ambition, long term planning and willingness to invest time and effort into aging qualifications. By contrast, working class jobs are less secure and have no career structure through which individuals can advance. There are few promotions opportunities and earnings peak at an early age
Cultural deprivation theorists view on working class subculture
Cultural deprivation theorists argue that parents pass on the values of their class to their children through primary socialisation. Middle class values equips children for success whereas working class values fail to do so.
What is compensatory education?
A program which aims to tackle the problem of cultural deprivation - by providing extra resources to schools and communities in deprived areas. They intervene early I. The socialisation process to compensate children for deprivation they experience at home.
Example of compensatory education
Best known example is operation head start in the United sates - a mutual billion dollar scheme of pre school education in poorer areas introduced in the 1960s. Aim was ‘planned enrichment’ of the deprived child’s environment to develop skills and install achievement motivation.
The myth of cultural deprivation - NELL KEDDIE (1973)
Describes cultural deprivation as a ‘myth’ and sees it as a victim blaming explanation. She dismisses the idea that failure at School can be blamed on a culturally deprived home background. She points out that a child cannot be deprived of its own culture and argues that working class children are simply culturally different, not deprived and they fail because they are but at a disadvantage by ran education system that is dominated by middle class values.
Keddie argues that rather than seeing the working class culture as deficient, schools should recognise and build on its strengths and should challenge teachers anti Woking class prejudice
The myth of cultural deprivation - Troyna and Jenny Williams (1986)
Argue that the problem is not the child’s language but the schools attitudes towards it. Teachers have a ‘speech hierarchy’: they label middle class speech highest, followed by working class speech and finally black speech
The myth of cultural deprivation deprivation- TESSA BLACKSTONE AND JO MORTIMORE (1994)
Other critics reject the view that working class parents are not interested in their children’s education. According to Blackstone and mortimore, they attend fewer parents evenings, not because lack of interest, but because they work longer or less regular hours or are put off by the schools middle class atmosphere.