Theories Of Romatic Reationships ✅ Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the theories of romantic relationships?

A
  • Social exchange theory.
  • Equity theory.
  • Rusbults model.
  • Duck’s phase model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the social exchange theory focus on?

A

Explaining how maintaining is a two-way process (exchange) in which individuals focus on the rewards from being in the relationships v the cost.
Higher satisfaction = less likely to leave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the social exchange theory definition?

A

Likelihood of a person staying in a relationship determined by assessment of costs and benefits + how it measures up against what they expect or could achieve elsewhere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who proposed the social exchange theory?

A

Thibaut and Kelley.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are rewards in a relationship?

A
  • Companionship.
  • Being cared for.
  • Sex.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the costs in a relationship?

A
  • Effort.
  • Financial investment.
  • Time wasted (opportunity cost).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What type of theory is the exchange theory?

A

Economic. Focuses on maximising profit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the social exchange theory suggest ab commitment?

A

Dependent on the profitability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Thibaut and Kelley propose how we predict the likelihood of someone staying in a relationship?

A
  • Comparison level. (Working out profit).
  • Comparison of alternatives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the comparison level? Explain?

A

Standard which we judge our relationship.
- Influenced by previous relationships. (Previous bad relation = lower CL. Thus be happy in bad relation).
- social norms (general views) = influenced by TV.
IF profit exceeds CL then relation is worthwhile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is comparison level alternatives?

A
  • Weighs up if alternatives have larger profit. (Maybe not relation).
  • Higher profit = temptation to leave.
  • More rewarding current = More dependent on current (therefore relation is stable).
  • Differences in dependence may lead to lack of commitment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the stages of development?

A

1) Sampling stages = explore benefits and costs (find them for eachother).
2) Bargaining = rewards and costs are agreed.
3) Commitment = exchange of rewards stabilised (can focus on relationship)
4) Institutionalisation = Norms establish/relationship relaxed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give an example of the stages of development?

A

Sampling = Cost of relation = busy
Bargaining = allocate a day to meet
Commitment = can focus on getting to know eachother.
Institutionalisation = relationship fully established and relaxed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Positive evaluation of social exchange theory?

A
  • Supporting evidence = murder and Schmitt
    185 couples who lie together (same sex as well as heterosexuals). Completed questionnaire.
    F =
    Supports social exchange as happiest people believe their rewards were high v low costs.
  • real world application = relationship therapy
    Unsuccessful marriages frequently report lack of positive exchanges.
    Got an and levenson = ration of positive to neg in successful marriages is 5:1 v 1:1. Therfore theorypy like IBCT attempted to increase this ration. (Study 2/3 improvement of 60 distressed couples.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negatives of social exchange theory?

A
  • Confusion on what constitutes a cost/benefit as there is possible individual difference in this (ie benefit of constant attention could be annoying for some) this suggests that there is difficulty to classify all events in simple terms challenging this view of relationships.
  • cultural bias = may not fully explain arranged marriages as rewards and costs should be more to family that the individuals also no comparison level cuz it is permanent).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the equity theory?

A

By Elaine Hatfield in 1970.
That the other person in relationship is considered and rewards should be equal. (Focuses on equal ration) if not then relationship may not be maintained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is equality theory applicable?

A

Used in therapy to highlight imbalances which cause problems.

18
Q

How can equity change in a relationship?

A
  • Start = natural to contribute more than you receive.
  • If relationship developers but you continue to effort it will get less satisfying.
    Therefore showing equities important in maintaining relationships.
19
Q

How do you deal with inequity? (Add more cuz she hasn’t uploaded slide).

A
  • Partners will work to maintain if they view the relationship as salvageable. Options…
    1) Restoration of acc equality (voluntarily setting things right or surging each other to).
    2) Restoration of psychological equity (couples in inequitable relationships can distort reality convincing them self things are fine).
    3) They can leave (if unable to restore equity) eg. emotionally losing feelings or physical divorce.
20
Q

What is equities supporting evidence? Explain it?

A

Van yperen bunk 1990:
- Longitudinal study.
- Couples recruited form newspaper.
- obtained equity scores form each relationship + satisfaction levels a year later.
65% = viewed relationship as equal
25% men = felt over benefitted.
25% women = felt under benefitted.
F = those who viewed it as equal were more satisfied.

21
Q

What are weaknesses of the equity theory?

A
  • cultural influences = theory assumes neeed for equity is for all.
    Auger -Ryan 2007 compared individualists+ collectivist couples.
    F = collectivist more satisfied when over benefitted possibly due to thinking ab benefits to community. But individualist satisfaction was higher for equity.
  • Individual differences = not every relationship seeks equity
    There are stages in relationships where things get rough and equity does not occur eg. Illness.
22
Q

Who created the investment? What from?

A

Rusbolts.
Development of social exchange theory.

23
Q

What does the investment model explain? Brief explanation?

A

Why people persist in some relationship.
This is not just bc of positive benefits (satisfaction) but also investment and a sense of alternatives.
Predicts changes of commitment.

24
Q

Simple version of the investment model?

A
  • Satifaction.
  • Compaarison w alternatives.
  • Investment.
25
Q

Explain satisfaction level?

A

satisfaction = positive v negative emotional experience/extent to which other person fulfills needs.
Does not need to be high inorder to stay (investment increases satisfaction).
Having it strengthens commitment.

26
Q

Explain comparison with alternative?

A

Extent to which alternative may provide superior outcomes. Wo this may cause persistence due to lack of better options. (Have higher commitment).

27
Q

Explain investment? What are the types?

A

Investment = anything someone puts in a relationship that will be lost if they leave. (Contributes to stability bc its costly to break).
- Intrinsic = time + effort.
- Extrinsic = house, network, kids.
People invest in a relationship to build a foundation.
This needs to be high.

28
Q

What is commitment level? What determines it?
What does it decide>

A

Likelyhood of staying in a relationship.
- investment. (Essential)
- satisfaction. (not)
- low alternatives.
Eg. High investment + low alternatives + high satisfaction = dependent on relationship.
If you will stay or leave.

29
Q

What is research support? (Investment model)

A
  • Rusbult + Martz = Applied the model to abusive relationships.
    P=asked women in refuges why they stayed.
    F= commitment highest = when financial alternative low + investment high.
30
Q

Research support for the investment model? (Meta analysis).

A

Agnew = 38k participants, 137 studies over 33 years.
F=
- commitment as a powerful prediction of a breakup.
- commitment is main psychological factor to get someone to stay in a relationship.

31
Q

What is a weakness of the investment model?

A
  • Cultural bias.
32
Q

Who created a model for relationship breakdowns? What is it called?

A

Duck 2007
Model of breakdown = stages people go through when relationship is not working.

33
Q

How many stages are there in ducks theory? What are they called?

A

Five.
1) Intra-psych
2) Dyadic phase
3) Social phase
4) Grave dressing
5) Resurrection

34
Q

When does the model of breakdown occur? How do you move through the stages?

A

When someone in a relationship isn’t happy.
Each stage is marked by a threshold.

35
Q

Explain the intra-psychic phase? Threshold?

A
  • Unsatisfactory thoughts appear which are not shared.
  • Privately blaming this on other person.
  • Planing possible future.
    Threshold = “can’t take it anymore”
36
Q

Explain the dyadic phase? Threshold?

A
  • Can’t avoid talking about issue therefore dissatisfaction is shared.
  • OUTCOMES = agreement to try salvage or breakup.
    Threshold = “make sense to break up” conclusion.
37
Q

What is the threshold?

A

Point when perception of relationship changes.

38
Q

What is the social phase? Threshold?

A
  • Breakup is public + will speak external support.
  • External support = critical and judgey of other person. (May reveal what they hid before).
  • point of no return.
    Threshold = “I’m serious about this”
39
Q

What is the grave-dressing phase? Threshold?

A
  • Grave = end of relationship.
  • dressing = making yourself look better. (Spin relationship).
  • To retain social credit (protect future relations + friends).
  • will downplay good traits of partners.
    Threshold = time to move on.
40
Q

Explain the resurrection stage?

A
  • NEWLY ADDED by duck due to criticisms of it being incomplete.
  • Ex-partners will look forward to future relationships.
  • past mistakes will be learnt.
41
Q

What are the strengths of the duck phase model?

A

Real life application:
- Suggests various ways of reversing the breakdown depending on stage.
- Duck recommends first stage to focus on positive aspects of partners.
- But for dyadic phase communication improvement could benefit stability of relationship.
- Different repair strategies useful at certain stages.
Therefore useful in relationship council.

Face validity is strong:
- Stages are relatable.

Stage 5
- Modifications added due to criticisms of it being incomplete.

42
Q

What are weaknesses of the duck model of breakdown?

A

Culture bias:
- based on western experiences who accept breakups.
- moghaddam highlights how individualist cultures have more voluntay/frequent relationships but collectivist are obligatory and less easy to end.
- therfore research can’t be generalised.
- this will decrease the validty of ducks work.

Descriptive:
- less able to explain WHY breakdowns occur.
- fatal attraction theory argues this cause is in the attractive qualities that brought them together.
- relationship threatened by partners getting too much of what they want. Eg sense of humour becomes annoying.