Factors Affecting Attraction In Romantic Relationships: ✅ Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the factors that affect attraction in romantic relationships?

A
  • Self-disclosure.
  • Physical attractiveness.
  • Filter theory.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is self-disclosure and how does it effect attraction?

A

When a person voluntarily shares private aspects of the self with another person. (Intimate thoughts,experiences)
Can build relationship satisfaction but depends when and how much.
Greater disclosure = greater feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who first mentions self-disclosure and what did he say?

A

Jourard = that a relationship can only form w someone if you are able to build up trust.
Therefore reveal thoughts/info and build intimacy/commitment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is self-disclosure explained?

A

“The onion metaphor”
- There are different layers of disclosure (breath + depth).
- As trust is built the depth grows (should be gradual).
- Top breath layers are low-risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Regis and shaver say on self-disclosure?

A

That for a relationship to develop it has to be balanced. (Reciprocated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did has and Stafford find out about self-disclosure?

A

57% gay men + women said that self-disclosure was the main way they maintained and deepened their committed relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is research into self-disclosure in affecting attraction?

A

Sprecher et al
A = investigate role of self-disclosure in relationships.
M = 156 American uni students F + F and M + F on skype.
Condition 1 = reciprocal self disclosure (both talked).
Condition 2 = not.
R = C1 reported greater liking/closeness to person.
C = reciprocity of self-disclosure has positive outcome for romantic relations/attraction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did spreecher find?

A

Difference between self-disclosure given + received. Received was a better indication of liking.
Self disclosure positively correlated to relationship stability. (study on 50 couples) Overall disclosure predicted duration of relationship (if they would stay together for over 4 years).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the difference between depth and breath disclosure?

A

Depth has higher impact on relationship satisfaction than more “natural” breath.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the norms of self-disclosure?

A
  • Only moderately personal disclosure in early stages of relationship.
  • Reciprocity norm is expected in disclosure (if one person discloses more they expect it in return).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are strengths of the self-disclosure factor?

A
  • Evidence eg. Correlations w level of self-disclosure and satisfaction.
  • compatibility w filter theory (self-disclosures enables assessment of similarity of attitudes).
  • evidence supports that too much too early is off putting (depends on stage of relation/appropriateness).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are disadvantages of self-disclosure?

A
  • Culture bias = prediction that self-disclosure leads to more romantic relation is not applicable to all culture’s. (Based on western romantic relations).
  • Differences of types of self-disclosure w individualist (have more sexual thoughts) and collectivist (china).
  • Correlational evidence therfore meaning other factors are at play.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are physically attractive for each gender?

A

Women = youthful, childlike face, wide big eyes and small nose and chin. (Cunningham)
Men = broad shoulders, smaller hip-waist ration and higher fitness. (Brown et al)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who said that physical attraction is a huge part of romantic relations?

A

McNulty et al 2008.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the halo effect? How is this supported?

A

We perceive attractive people as having other positive attributes (kind eyes thus kind personality).
Therefore are more desirable and are treated differently.
Dion et al =
Attractive people consistently rated as successful, kid and social.
We behave more positively towards them.
Due to these beliefs we are further attracted to the individual.
(Overall have disproportionate influence by looks on our judgement to their other attributes eg personality.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the east wick study? 2011

A

May physical attraction just be as important to women as it is to men. But for women it is more for short-term relationships but serious is less important. But men more likely in Long-term relations.

17
Q

Explain the matching hypothesis?

A

We evaluate our own looks and this effects who we go for. (Equal social desirablility).
We opt for similar due to maximising chance of successful outcomes.

18
Q

What does are self-evaluation in the matching hypothesis have to be? Why and how? Overal who do people go for?

A

“Realistic” = bc then more likely to be reciprocated.
Using multiple factors.
Level 1 = physical attraction.
Level 2 = status or money.
Individuals “in their league”.

19
Q

What study does not support the matching hypothesis? Explain it?

A

Waster et al:
A = examine matching hypothesis.
M =
- Advertise a dance for freshers in an American uni.
- 376 M 376 W volunteer.
- Four independent judges rate attractiveness.
- individuals given a questionnaire. (Asses personality). = told this would determine paring.
- pairing done randomly.
- did questionnaire in middle of dance + months after.
F =
- Regardless of own attractiveness they responded more positively to physically attractive dates/more likely to ask for second date.
(Other factors like personality did not effect it).
Overal only wanted another date if person was good looking irrespective of own data.

20
Q

Explain the speed dating challenge to tradition views of attraction? (Eastwick and Finkle)

A

H = sex differences in preference does not predict real life choice. (Men= looks women = money).
P= longdisudinal speedating
F =
Before dates = showing traditional preferences.
After = ideal preferences had no sig sex difference acc the evaluation of a partners characteristics.

21
Q

Evaluation? If needed

A
22
Q

What is the filter theory? Name the filters?

A

Explanation of relationship formation (influences initial attraction). That series of factors limit the range of availability of romantic partners.
- social demography.
- similarities in attitudes.
- complementarity.

23
Q

How was the filter theory created?

A

Kerckhoff and Davis = compared attitudes/personalities of student couples in ST + LT.

24
Q

Do these factors vary of importance at difference stages of a relationship give example?

A

Start = someone lives in Australia (big importance).

25
Q

Explain the first filter social demography? What is the outcome?

A

Factors that influence chance of meeting person.
- proximity (more easily accessible).
- social class (“too different”)
-levels of education.
-ethnicity/religion.
Social circumstances limit realistic field. Homogamy (more likely to form relation w socially similar).

26
Q

Explain the second level? Similarities in attitudes how is it supported?

A

Individuals will look for partners w similar psychological factors (music, politics).

Kerchoff + Davis = this level spec important for ST couples (need for partners in early stage to agree = encourages self disclosure/deeper communication).

Donn Bryce = consistent finding that similarity causes attraction (little income relation = will fizzle out).

27
Q

Explain the 3rd level? Complementarity

A

Ability for romantic partners to meet each others needs.
Compliment = when have traits other lacks eg funny + likes to laugh.
Kerckhodd and Davis = most important for LT relations aka at later stages opposites attract.
(Partners feel they form a whole = ads depth to relationship).

28
Q

Positive evaluation?

A