Theories Of Romantic Relationships Flashcards
What is social exchange theory and explain how it links to open at conditioning
- an economic theory
- relationships run in a similar way to businesses- people are haggling in order to get the best deal
- based on the principles of open at conditioning- form and maintain relationships because they are rewarding- profitable
- if it ends it will stop being profitable be chase the costs outweigh the rewards
- relationships run like a balance sheet- partners are always trying to maximise their rewards and limit their costs
What does satisfactory depend on
- depends on the outcome
- ‘balance of rewards and costs’
- a successful relationship is profitable because the rewards outweigh the costs
What is the comparison level
- we develop a standard which we compare all our relationships against
- based on all of our experiences plus our views that we expect someone to fulfil
- if we judge the relationship to exceed our CL the relationship will be judged as worthwhile
- if the outcome is negative we will be dissatisfied
What is a comparison for alternatives
- we weigh up a potential increase in rewards from a potential partner minus any costs involved in ending our current relationship
What are the 4 stages that all relationships go through
- sampling
- bargaining
- commitment
- institutionalisation
What is the sampling stage
- rewards and costs are assessed in a number of relationships
What is the bargaining stage
- a relationship is costed out and sources of profit and loss are identified
What is the commitment stage
- relationship is established and maintained by a predictable exchange of rewards
What is institutionalisation stage
- interactions are established and the couple settle down
Main case study for social exchange theory
- rusbult and hartz
- investigated 100 women staying a women’s refuge
- all had been abused by their partners
- measured their commitment factors( length of relationship), independence factors( education/number of children), satisfactory( severity/ attribute of blame)
- 1/3 did not return
- 1/3 immediately returned
- 1/3 did return after some time
- women had felt the greatest commitment to their relationship when their economic alternatives were poor and investment were great
Evaluation of the theory
:( does not take equity into account
- this says that people not looking for a relationship in which they can over benefit, but in which the rewards for both parties are equal
:( difficult to quantify what rewards and costs are
- they are subjective and unique to each person
:( most of the research is artificial
:( inappropriate assumptions underlying the SET
-
What is equity theory
- another economic theory
- developed in response to significant criticisms of SET
- ‘equity’ means fairness in this sense
- what matters most is that both partners profit levels are the same
What if a relationship in unequal
- cause distress
- happens when one person gives a great deal and gets little in return (inequality)
- same is true for the other way around
- over benefiting and under benefiting are both examples of inequality
- under benefiting partner will feel the greatest dissatisfied
What are the perceived ratios of inputs and outputs
- inequity doesn’t mean inequality
- two people can put in various amounts and still maintain equity
- person holds subjective views on the relative inputs and outputs of themselves and their partner
- if we fear inequity might try and change our inputs and outputs
- it’s not the size that matters it’s the ratio
What is profit
- rewards are maximised and costs are minimised