theories of romantic realitonships - rusbults investment model Flashcards

1
Q

rusbults investment model

A

commitment deoends on three factors

investment model is a development of the soical exhnage theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

factor 1 - statsifaction

A

based on the conept of the comparison level

satisfying relationship is judged by compairng rewards and costs

seen to be profitbale if it had many rewards and few costs

each partner is geerally satisfied if they are getting more out of the relationshop than they expect based on previosu norms and experinces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

factor 2 - compariosn wiht lternaitves

A

compariosn with alternaitves results in romantic partners asking if their needs could be better met outside of their current relaitobship are alternaitves more rewarding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

factor 3 investment

A

anything we would lose if the relaitonship came to an end

intrinsic investment - any resources we put directly into the relaitonshop
tnagiable things such as money or possessuons or intagiables such as energy emotion and self disclosures

extrinsic investments - resources that previosuly did not feature in the relationshop but are now closely associated wiht it can be tanguable such as car or mutual friends or children

if partners in a relaitonhip expeirnce hugh levles of satisfaction and the laternaitves are less attractive and the sizes of thier investment are increasing then we can conifently predotc thayt partners will be committedd to their relaitonship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

satisaction versus commitment

A

commitment is the main psychological facotr that cuases people to stay in romantic relaitonshops

can help to explain why dissatisied partners may choose to stay in a relaitonshp - its becuase they are committed ot that partner

they have made investments that they do not want to see go to waste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

relationship maintenance mechanisims

A

put their partners interestst first (willingness to sacrifice)
promote the rlaitonshop (accomidatun)

committed partners think about eachother anf potential alernaitves in specific ways

they are unrealistically postive about hteir parnter (positve illusions)

negative about tempting alternaitves and other peopel realtionshops (ridiculign alternatives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strength

A

researhc support

meta-analysis by Benjamin le and agnew

reviewed 52 studies from late 1970s to 1999

together included 11000 participants in 5 countries

found that satisfaction comparison with alternatives and investment size all predicted relationship commitment

relationship in which commitment was greatest were the most stable and lasted longest

these outcomes were true for both men and women across all cultures in the analysis and for homosexual as well as heterosexual couples

validity to rusbults claims that these factors are universally importnat features of romantic relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

strength

A

explains absuive relationships

expalantions of relationships that involve intimate partner violence

Rusbult and Marty studied domestically abused women at a shelter and fount that those most likely to return to an absuive partner reported having made the greatest investment an having the fewest attractive alternatives

these women were dissatistfed with their relationships but still committed to them

therefor model shows that satisfaction on its own cannot explain why people stay in relationships commitment and investment are also factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

limitation

A

oversimplifies investment

views investent in a simplistic one-dimensional way

Good friend and Agnew point out that there is more to investment than just the resources you have already put into a realtionship

in the early stages partners will have made very few actual investments

Good friend and Agnew extende drusbults orignical model by including the investment partners make in their future plans

motivated to commit to each other because they want to see their cherished plans for the future work out

means that original model is limited because it fails to recognise the tue complexity of investment

especially ow planning for the future influences commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly