theories of religion Flashcards
what are the three main ways to define religion?
substantive definitions
functional definitions
constructionist definitions
what are substantive definitions?
focus on the content or substance of religious belief such as belief on God or the supernatural
widespread view of religion as a belief in God
(weber)
criticisms of substantive definitions?
leaves no room for beliefs and practices that perform similar functions to religions but don’t involve belief in God
Western bias because exclude religions such as Buddhism which don’t have a God
what are functional definitions?
focus on social or psychological functions it performs for individuals or society
Durkheim, contribution it makes to social integration
evaluation of functional definitions?
advantages: inclusive, allowing a wide range of beliefs and practices that perform functions such as integration
no bias against non-western religions e.g Buddhism
disadvantages: just because an institution helps integrate individuals into groups doesn’t make it a religion e.g. collective chanting at football matches provides a sense of integration but not a religion
what are constructionist definitions?
interpretivists approach focus on how members of society themselves define religion, not possible to produce a universal definition, since different individuals and groups mean different things by religion
don’t assume religions always involves a belief in God or the supernatural, or that it performs similar functions for everyone in all societies
evaluation of constructionist definitions
advantages: allows them to get close to the meanings people themselves give to religion
disadvantages: impossible to generalise about the nature of religion since people have widely differing views about what counts as religion
evaluation of constructionist definitions
advantages: allows them to get close to the meanings people themselves give to religion
disadvantages: impossible to generalise about the nature of religion since people have widely differing views about what counts as religion
what does Durkheim say about religion?
the sacred and the profane
totemism
the collective conscience
cognitive functions of religion
sacred and the profane
key feature of religion was a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane
sacred: things set apart and forbidden, that inspire feelings of awe, fear and wonder
profane: no special significance, ordinary and mundane
sacred things evoke such powerful feelings as they are symbols representing something of great power, sacred symbols vary between religions but all unite believers into a single moral community
Durkheim research of religion
studied the Arunta, an aboriginal Australian tribe, to understand the function of their belief system
totemism
the totem is the clan’s emblem (animal/plant) the shared totemic rituals reinforce group’s solidarity and sense of belonging
Durkheim says in fact they are worshipping society, although not aware, inspires feelings of awe as it represent power of the group
collective conscious
sacred symbols represents collective conscience, without these society would disintegrate
regular shared rituals reinforce collective conscience
rituals remind individual of the power of society, without which they themselves are nothing
religion performs important function for the individual, making us feel part of something greater than ourselves, strengthens us to face life’s problems
cognitive functions of religion
religion is the source of our cognitive capabilities, in order to think we need categories such as time and space
religion provides concepts and categories needed for understanding the world and communicating with others, provides basic categories
religion is the origin of human thought, reason and science
criticisms of Durkheim
evidence on totemism is unsound, no sharp division between sacred and the profane and that different clans share the same totems
Postmodernists say Durkheim’s ideas can’t be applied to contemporary society, increasing diversity has fragmented collective conscience so no longer a single shared value system for religion to reinforce