Theories of Punishment Flashcards
Utilitarian
justification lies in the useful purposes of punishment
Retributive
justification lies on the fact that people who commit crime deserve punishment
When should punishment not be inflicted? (4)
- When it is groundless
- When it is ineffective
- When it is unprofitable/too expensive
- When it is needless
(4) goals of Utilitarianism
- General deterrence
- Individual deterrence
- Incapacitation
- Reform/Rehabilitation
General Deterrence
reduce crime by discouraging others
Individual deterrence
if an offender has been punished before, won’t commit crime again
Incapacitaion
keeping them out of general circulation or physically prevent people from acting upon destructive tendencies
Reform/Rehabilitation
punishment can rehabilitate so wish to commit crimes will lessen
Criticism to Utilitarianism (3)
- Justifies punishment of an innocent person to minimize risk and appease society
- Moral objection to rehabilitation as punishment (community might want offender punished, not treated)
- Ignores dignity and rights of wrong doers
4 Types of Retribution
- Positive Retribution
- Negative
- Assaultive
- Victim-centered
Stephen’s principle
Assaultive retribution- Criminals should be hated
Morris princple
Protective retribution- Punishing pays deference to the individuals freely chosen act. Focus on offender
defendant has right to be punished. He is a human who made choice and we have to respect and accept that
Kant principle
Pro-retribution. Punishment respects humanity. Punishment should be imposed not to deter, but because person committed crime
Wechsler principle
Utilitarian retribution- satisfying community’s demand for retribution can keep people vested in legal system
Murphy & Hampton principle
Restorative justice- victim centered
Victim was harmed, D hurt victim, assumed control of victim In order for victim to balance the scales, D must be punished