Theories And Methods 💭 Flashcards

1
Q

Hegel’s dialect (Marxism)

A

Synthesis
|
Thesis—> <—antithesis

Taking an idea from earlier philosophy and applying it to history
Marx used this to explain how history moves through different stages and eventually it will move to a communist state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Neo Marxism - humanistic Marxism

A

Antonio Gramsci
- people choose to live under capitalism
- however this isn’t a free choice it’s because we aren’t aware of the alternatives
- we see any non capitalist options as restriction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gramsci’s Centaur

A

The human front represents state institutions like the media to convince us capitalism is the only legitimate system. The rear end represents the force to make us accept this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evaluating Gramsci’s work

A

Functionalists would argue that the media and education reflect the values of society rather than enforcing them as they are made of value consensus rather than capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Neo Marxism - scientific Marxism

A

Louis Althusser
Resists attempts to change Marx’s original meaning
- choice is an illusion
- the ISA and RSA prevent anyone from making a choice
- this hasn’t changed from Marx’s time to present and never will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluations to Althusser

A

He fails to add anything to Marx’s theory. He downplays the power of free will and the power of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Neo Marxism - the Frankfurt school

A

Theodor Adorno

Studied fascism

Authoritarian personality where people turned towards fascism even when they don’t agree

Jurgen Habermas argued that we have been convinced we need things in our capitalist society, creating a split between false needs and real needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluating the Frankfurt school

A

Theories and concepts are impossible to measure, define or observe ( bad sociology)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Post structural Marxism

A

Slavoj Zizek argues that capitalism has created a world so full of symbols that everything is meaningless. People have no ability to decode the world’s meanings and therefore understand it. This has led to a desire to return to a more animalistic and uncivilised era. The world is dominated by “the symbolic” ( a dominance of capitalist ideas and symbols)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Structuration

A

Giddens - people are shaped by societal influence but also play a part into what influence society has

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What do functionalists believe

A
  • society is a thing it is a structural theory
  • everyone and everything has a role to play
  • concern about the health of society as it’s a living thing it can become unhealthy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of functionalism

A

Durkheim - exists before functionalism breaks up into differing ideas

Structural functionalism - based on parsons interpretation of Durkheim work

Neo- functionalism - based on Mertons interpretation of Durkheims work

The new right - interpretation of functionalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Durkheim

A
  • family plays a part in socialising children and creating a value consensus
  • education teaches specialist skills and moral values
  • societies contain a sacred sphere and a profane sphere which both have functions that benefit society
  • some crime is positive and strengthens collective consciousness. Too much is an indication of anomie
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Integration and regulation

A

Integration - do people feel a part of society and can they impact what happens?

Regulation - do people understand where they fit in and do they know what’s expected of them?

Durkheim argues that too much or too little of them can lead to anomie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Durkheim - suicide

A
  • too much or too little regulation or integration causes higher suicide rates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of Durkheim

A

It’s unfocused and poorly defined, contains many terms and theory’s that can’t be measured scientifically going against his positivist beliefs

17
Q

Interpretations of anomie

A

Durkheim - anomie is the absence of strong integration and regulation

Structural functionalism - absence of values that keep society functioning

Neo-functionalism - state where individuals can’t achieve what they need to succeed

New right - state we are living in, underclass

18
Q

Structural functionalism

A

Society must stay the same in order to remain stable, any change is bad because society is organic and clearly works

19
Q

Evaluating structural functionalism

A

Parsons just takes durkheims ideas and changes their meaning, Kai T Erikson says that Parsons mixed his personal views with Durkheims terminology. Durkheims believed in social change not stagnation

Any theory that believes in social change like feminism or Marxism

20
Q

Neo- functionalism

A

Focuses on clarifying Durkheims thoughts.
Key concept of Mertons strain theory

21
Q

Evaluating Neo-functionalism

A

If society is taken from our relationship to our values then there should be measurable values of society. Merton only wrote about America, other counties don’t have these core values

22
Q

Evaluating Neo-functionalism

A

If society is taken from our relationship to our values then there should be measurable values of society. Merton only wrote about America, other counties don’t have these core values

23
Q

The new right

A

Both new right and functionalism are concerned with the health of society and need institutions to fulfil their roles adequately to keep society going

24
Q

Lyotard - rejection of meta-narratives

A

Jean Francois Lyotard argues that the key aspect of moving a society from modernity to
postmodernity is the rejection of metanarratives. A metanarrative is a ‘big story’ that explains
society, life or the world. This is the dominant idea of postmodernist
theories.

25
Postmodernism and Relativism
Lyotard argues that this has led to "relativism" - our worlds are different to each others, because they're shaped by our experiences and understandings as well as choices. So we literally all live in our world. This means that there is little point in conducting large scale research, as everyone's experiences are different.
26
Greater choice
Postmodernists argue that modern life is characterised by far greater choice than has previously been available. Two studies from the research methods component could be used here. Just make sure the topic sentence answers this question. Kendal Project: a huge survey that found far greater religious choice in a working- class northern town. People participated in many non-traditional religious practices. Becky Tipper: children typically constructed their own version of families, often including non-relations, animals and even inanimate objects. Adults increasingly would do the same.
27
Baudrillard- Hyperreality
Baudrillard talks about symbols, and how our ability to interpret symbols in different ways means that society is 'speeding up'. This is hyperreality. The two key examples to use are the media and religion. Research to consider: Baudrillard, Lizek
28
Late Modernity
Giddens argued that there is far greater, but not unlimited, choice in modern society. That is because we are shaped by society, but can in turn shape society back. For example, Giddens argued that gay men were pioneers of families of choice, and the communities that they formed became commonplace for everyone a decade later.
29
Late Modernity 2
Ulrich Beck argued that a consequence of greater choice and connection in modern life was a greater awareness of risk. With that awareness came our understanding that we could do little about it. In particular, in modern life we cannot combat the risks facing us, leaving us feeling helpless. Beck calls this "risk society".
30
Key Evaluations of Postmodernism
Marxists and feminists say that postmodernists underplay the levels of conflict in society. Postmodernists believe that structural inequality no longer exists, and any inequality is purely down to actions.
31
Key Evaluations of Postmodernism
Jurgen Habermas is the most famous critic of postmodernism. He argues that postmodernism is obscurant: it actually makes it harder, not easier, to understand the world. This is because it uses complex terms and philosophical ideas that don't have any particular meaning.
32
Social Action Theories
These theories suggest that we are shaped by actions- either our own, or the actions of those around us. The most simple of all of these is interactionism, or symbolic interactionism. You could also include discourse feminism in here, although you would emphasize different ideas- the point here would be that it's our actions and discussions of gender that create the discourse (e.g. conversation).
33
Weber & Interactionism
Weber argues that "social actions" - actions that involve anyone other than the "actor" - shape society. He says there is a "cause and effect" relationship- our actions cause other actions, and so on, altering society. This leads to him being viewed as an early interactionist- although this term wouldn't exist in his lifetime.
34
Weber's iron cage
Weber argued that this cause and effect causes social changes, for example the shift to capitalism. He argues that social actions shift towards rationalisation and away from 'enchantment, leading us to a bureaucratic and less passionate society.
35
Goffman- Performativity
Goffman's central argument is that we have no fixed self- we simply present ourselves in lots of different ways. For example, in one role a person may present themselves very differently to the same person in a different role. These presentations are influenced by how others respond, our own experiences, and our interpretations of the world and the roles we've fulfilled. Mortification is an attempt by institutions to change the way these roles are fulfilled, by stripping away our performances and reshaping them.
36
Phenomenology
"Typifications" Essentially, we view our experiences through the lens of past experience. "This event is like this other event, so it means this". It argues that we are shaped not by moral entrepreneurs, but by our own unique experiences- and interpretations of these experiences. This argument is by Albert Shultz,
37
Phenomenology
Essentially, phenomenologists argue that our understanding of the world is based entirely on past experience. This could be learnt from other people, but essentially, individuals continuously recreate the world by interpreting things (phenomena). Psychologists- this links to the idea of schema.
38
Ethnomethodology
Associated with Howard Garfinkel. It involves using conversation analysis to make sense of everyday life. Essentially, ethnomethodologists are interested in how we understand everyday life, rather than the huge conflicts or structures of structural theories.
39
Evaluating Social Action Theories
Many theories would say that, by picking up on tiny details of everyday life, Social Action Theories forget that the point of sociology is to encourage social change. Many would argue that Social Action Theories study the least important parts of society. Social Action Theories also share flaws with postmodernism, in that they can be obscurant. Habermas argues that, because social action theory dresses everyday concepts up in complex terminology, it actually makes the world harder to explain. Some postmodernists would argue that Social Action Theories tell us more about the researcher than the research group. For example, Conversation Analysis may tell us more about how ethnomethodologists understand the world, rather than everyday people. Weber is often criticised for selective use of information. Some have argued that his Protestant Ethic confuses cause and effect, and that Protestantism may actually be caused by Capitalism, rather than the other way round. Eisenstadt argues that there may in fact be no relationship. Marxists criticise his argument that capitalism is an inescapable "iron cage".