Theories Flashcards
Fredrick Taylor 1911—Scientific management
- Management that is rooted in quantitative measure
- Productivity improvements at the individual level leads to increases in efficiency, individual productivity, and profit
- Maximizing benefits to employer (efficiency and profits) and employees (wages and work environment)
- How to get more from workers
- Led to improved factory efficient and shared rewards with workers but organizational abused system leading to rise in labor unions and humanist movement
March & Simon, 1958
• Argue for developing a strong and foundational organizational literature, instead of just resting on psychology and sociology
• Introduced the concept of bounded rationality, which means that an individual’s decisions are bound by the number of alternative available to them
• 3 key assumptions
o Humans are choosers and decision makers
o Humans can do 1 or few things at a time
o Humans can only access a small amount of information from their environment and their memory (bounded rationality)
Weber 1922—bureaucracy
• Seminal work in OT
• 3 types
o Charismatic- built on personality of leader
o Traditional- based on established and traditional beliefs of the group
o Rational legal- based on reason, law and impartially
• Different types of authority will have different effects on the organizations structure (orgs based on charismatic and traditional authority are not as stable as those based on rational-legal author)
defining good theory
• Whetton 1989—domain; limitations; explanation
expectancy theory
- Vroom 1964 hypothesized that employees choose behaviors that have the highest probability of leading to valued outcomes.
- Porter and Lawler 1968 included individual differences, the relationship between performance and satisfaction, and a feedback loop in the model
- People will do what they think they can when they want something
future of management
- Doctor et all 1991—International application
* VanMaanen 1989—more descriptors
transformational leadership
- Burns 1978; bass 85, Allen 95 (use both styles)
- Rely on vision, symbols, values to move org
- Leaders learn org culture; develop new vision; transmit vision to followers
path goal theory
• birth of theory= Evans 1970 Ohio state leadership studies
• House 71, 96
• Job of leader is to motivate followers-influence followers expectations and their motivation
• Explains 4 kinds of leadership behavior (House & Mitchell 1974)
o Directive =lets subordinates know what is expected of them and gives specific guidance
o Supportive = friendly and approachable leader who shows concern for the status, wellbeing, and needs of subordinates
o Participative = leader who consults with subordinates, solicits their suggestions and takes these suggestions seriously into consideration before making decisions
o Achievement-oriented= sets challenging goals, expects subordinates to perform at their highest level, continuously seeks improvement in performance.
path goal theory explanation
• 4 leadership behavior influence 3 subordinate attitudes
o Satisfaction
o Acceptance of leader
o Expectations that effort will result in performance and that effective performance is path to rewards
• Assumes that the subordinate will want to achieve goals when they show to give personal payoff (house 1996)
• Different leadership styles can be enacted by the same leader in different situations (House & Mitchell 1974)
• Supportive leadership is most effective for subordinate who work on stressful, frustrating or dissatisfying tasks. (House & Mitchell 1974)
contingency theory of leadership
• Fiedler 67
o Leadership a function of situational control and leader motivation-task style works best in high or low control situations; relationship style in moderately controlled situations
o Effectiveness of task-oriented and relations-orientated leaders is contingent on the demands imposed by the situation
group/teams
• Hollenbeck et al 95
o 3+ persons, interdependence on collective task, social recognition as entity, team more developed
• IV’s
o Decision making, motivation, leadership, goals, person-team fit, justice/power, trust
• DVs
o Performance, commitment, innovation, group think, shared cognitions, failure, Org citizenship behavior
• Smith 1967
o A group’s two or more freely interacting individuals who share collective norms and goals and have a common identity
• Schein 1980
o 4 sociological criteria of groups=Two or more freely acting individuals, collective norms, collective goals, common identity
• A team is developmentally advanced, have toes to each other
• Research increased from 40s-70s (Zander 1979)\Likert 1961 include groups in or framework
• 3 aspects of team development (Ilhen et all 2005)
o Affective, behavioral, cognitive
• 3 stages of team development (Ilgen et al 2005)
o Forming
Trusting, planning, structuring
Issues: team potency, trust, information sharing/seeking, strategy development, team training, team memory
o Functioning
Bonding, adapting, learning
Issues: affect/emotions, diversity, conflict, work load sharing, learning from minority and best member
o Finishing
Team disbandment or reorganization
diversity
• Wittenbaum & Stasser 96
o Diverse groups have more access to info networks
o Leads to more creative
o Better quality decisions but the natural tendency to seek like others (shared interest) works against this
multidimensional commitment
• Meyer & Allen 97
Affective (AC) I want to stay
Continuance (OC) It is better to stay
Normative (NC) I should stay
social exchange
• Balu 64
o Employee commits to org based on perceived or support (POS)
job involvement
• Lodhal & Kejner 65
o Extent to which one is personally involved in a work role; involvement as psy-identification
• Brown 96
o Involvement moderately related to job satisfaction