Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

LAWS1001 > Theoretical Approaches & Debates/Critiques > Flashcards

Theoretical Approaches & Debates/Critiques Flashcards

1
Q

Social contract theory

A

Thomas Hobbes- agree to give up a certain percentage of our personal freedoms (follow a set of laws) to the government (leviathan) to ensure freedom, security, social order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Holmes definition of law

A

the law is what judges tell us it is - different judges interpret law in different ways aka LEGAL REALISM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Benjamin Cardozo’s definition of law

A

law is predictable with a limited certainty. if you break the law, it will be enforced w/punishment, but it’s also subject to interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Max Weber’s definition of law

A

If you break the law, it will be enforced by personnel holding themselves specially ready for that purpose- ex, courts, judges, lawyers. EXPLICIT rules enforced by SANCTIONS of public officials and private individuals. Authorized personnel create, interpret, and enforce the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hoebel’s law jobs

A

(1) define relationships/social change, (2) allocation of authority to coerce, (3) dispute settlement, (4) redefine relationships/social change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

social change

A

large number of people engaging relationships that are different from what they (or their parents) did previously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Major change in the evolution of legal system

A

As society becomes more heterogenous and populated, we rely less on shared beliefs and more on a formal (written) set of laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

17th and 18th century European settler views on Indigenous land

A

saw land as vacant, and indigenous people as having “no law” — little respect of their beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paul Russell: Main points

A

Canada’s judiciary system is formed of socio-economic development, political beliefs/ideology, and legal culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

There are TWO formal legal systems in Canada. What does this mean?

A

Canada is a BIJURAL country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Four principles of open secularism in Quebec

A

(1) freedom of conscience/religion (2) moral equality (3) neutrality of the state and (4) separation of church and state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indigenous beliefs of land

A

believed in creation myths- everything is organized in a greater reality, focuses on responsibility of earth and nature & TO EACH OTHER, rather than rights of the individual against the group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legal Positivism

A

Hobbes and Locke: Law as a set of commands/rules that are created by a sovereign entity. Focuses on what the law is, not what it ought to be. Ignores morality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Legal Realism

A

Holmes. Says that judges formulate the law’s meaning based on their own personal conception of Justice, or what the law ought to be. Not focused on what the law says, but more what’s going on “behind the scenes”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Natural law theory

A

Suggests an inherent link between law on morality- moral values and their place in law. Claims that law is only legitimate when it conforms to higher, universal principles of morality. Without this, society would inevitably fall apart. Aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Legitimacy of the law

A

why should we obey certain laws- what makes them legitimate? examined through legal positivism, legal realism, and natural legal theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Conflict approach

A

Social behaviour is best understood in terms of conflict & tension between groups and individuals.
Society is a location for struggle over scarce commodities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Consensus assumption

A

Legislature is built on democracy and majority vote/consensus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Durkheim’s assumption of law and society

A

law promotes solidarity in already-stable societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Weber’s assumption of law and society

A

law is always created, interpreted, and enforced by authorized personnel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Critiques of natural law theory

A

Only concerned w/ morality- doesn’t propose a link between law and society. Vague, varies by culture, too subjective, too religious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Critiques of legal positivism

A

Ignores concept of morality & justice (justifies evil laws) and human agency. Doesn’t account for impact of politics, economics, or culture on laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Legal Liberalism

A

Law as a reflection of the individual as the core actor in society- focusing on individual rights. Assumes that individuals are rational, self-interested, autonomous, and dignified. Law should protect liberty and equality. Also assumes that the law is neutral and acts in the equal interest of everyone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Critiques of legal liberalism

A

Flawed assumptions of individual: we are not always rational, self-interested, autonomous, and dignified. Eurocentric conception of society. Ignores tensions between liberty & equality. Law is NOT neutral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Utilitarianism approach

A

John Stuart Mill- a law is moral if it promotes overall happiness/benefit of everyone in society- not just for an indivivdual. Suggests “freedom of inquiry” approach, which Patrick Fitzgerald argues is not feasible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Critical Legal Studies

A

Law is a systematic means of power and is NOT neutral. Judges are also political actors and distribute power by making legal decisions that create winners/losers. Critical of judicial method- why so much power if their unelected? Argues that judges manipulate the law to reform it to their own personal idea of justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Critiques of critical legal studies

A

On the right track, but focuses too much on individual factors- needs to look at systemic factors of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Feminist Legal Theory

A

Rejects the neutrality of law- argues that that reinforces patriarchy and benefits men to the detriment of women. Jurisprudence as a historically male-dominated field and laws made in best interests of a male. Ex, spousal rape provisions

29
Q

Critical race theory

A

Argues that legal structures create and reinforce racism (ex, racialized people overrepresented in criminal justice system, slavery was allowed by law). Also presents the idea of jury nullification- acquitting a racialized man despite knowing he’s guilty

30
Q

Critical Aboriginal/Indigenous Legal Theory

A

Focus on the negative impact of legal structures on indigenous people- overrepresentation, discounting oral traditions of communication (in favour of western written traditions)

31
Q

Critiques of the critics?

A

Fails to deal with cross-cutting sources of discrimination and inequality. Unrealistic and debates about proper focus

32
Q

Indigenous assimilation

A

wanted to absorb indigenous culture into dominant society- make them the same and “disappear” into society- Indian act and residential school system

33
Q

The White paper

A

Pierre Trudeau- policy changes to “end special treatment” for indigenous people, advocate for assimilation

34
Q

The Constitution express

A

push for aboriginal treaties to be brought to the forefront and recognized in the constitution

35
Q

Truth and reconciliation commission

A

survivors of residential schools bring awareness to the issue

36
Q

Brian Tamanha

A

law is a mirror of society that functions to maintain social order.

37
Q

H.L.A Hart

A

legal positivism

38
Q

Conflict theory

A

Karl Marx- Law promotes interest of ruling class & perpetuates inequality. Focus on role of economy/mode of production, which affects social relations. Law is part of “superstructure” designed to control class conflict

39
Q

Consensus Approach

A

Society viewed as an organic (though imperfect) whole.
Focus on how different actors/institutions work together
Often involves “functionalist analysis”

40
Q

Emile Durkheim & Consensus Approach

A

Assumes shared values in society. TWO types of solidarity- mechanical and organic. TWO types of law- repressive vs. restitutive
Solidarity: mechanical (social integration based on common beliefs/values) and organic (social cohesion based on dependence individuals have on each other- more advanced societies). Repressive vs. restitutive laws

41
Q

Mechanical solidarity

A

social integration based on common beliefs/values

42
Q

Organic solidarity

A

social cohesion based on the dependence individuals have on each other- more advanced societies

43
Q

Repressive law

A

based on force/pressure, AGAINST will of people

44
Q

Restitutive law

A

requires offender to comply with law and potentially pay for harm done

45
Q

Rationalization

A

Max Weber: Rational vs. Irrational legal systems, formal vs. substantive law. Argues that modern law is authoritative and relies on a formal & rational system

46
Q

Rational legal system

A

Based on authority of modern democracy, legitimate (ex, officials who are elected)- yields predictable results

47
Q

Irrational legal system

A

Outcomes are unpredictable, not legitimate or rational

48
Q

Formal law

A

law as a fair set of rules

49
Q

Substantive law

A

establishing rights & obligations of individuals

50
Q

Roger Cotterrell

A

Outlines importance of social theory in legal studies, rejecting theories of Marx, Durkheim, Weber- “distrust of grand narratives leads to more modest view of social theory”

51
Q

Menkel-Meadow

A

Law is created by humans to govern themselves, create order & social control, and to provide justice at its best. Argues that modern law must take ideas & findings of other non-law disciplines seriously, because society isn’t entirely autonomous

52
Q

Brian Tamanaha

A

Law is implicated in almost everything in society- w/out boundaries. 3 key groups: legal sociologists, socio-legal scholars, critical legal studies.

53
Q

Tamanaha’s Legal sociologists

A

advance the science of society

54
Q

Tamanaha’s Socio-legal scholar

A

how legal actors/institutions actually operate

55
Q

Tamanaha’s Critical legal studies

A

exposing how law systematically furthers interests of powerful groups

56
Q

Rationalistic Model of Law

A

law is a rational way of preventing harm in society

57
Q

Functionalist Model of Law

A

law is a normative consensus (collective agreement) of society and how it should operate

58
Q

Conflict Model

A

law is a way to maintain power of the dominant class

59
Q

Moral Entrepreneur Model

A

law is created to reflect the moral preferences of several small activist groups

60
Q

Morton and Knoff’s argument regarding limits of the judiciary role

A

Judges shouldn’t be able to strike down legislation due to a lack of LEGITIMACY (not elected) and CAPACITY (experts in law, not policy).

61
Q

Left critiques of constitutional rights protection

A

judges fail to protect rights, threat to democratic action

62
Q

Right critiques of constitutional rights protection

A

judges need to interpret the law in a more broad and purposive approach, threat to judicial activism

63
Q

What do Brickey and Comack argue about our perception of law?

A

Must move away from a marxist perspective of law as a dominant form of capitalism and rethink of law as an important agent of social transformation

64
Q

Critiques of Marxist legal lens from Brickey and Comack

A

viewing law through a Marxist lens focuses on it’s oppressive role and fails to recognize the potential to use law for social change

65
Q

What are two ways we can move law away from oppressive capitalism?

A

(a) push law to it’s full limits to see where oppression lies, (b) push law to it’s limits to recognize group rights

66
Q

Brickey and Comack argue these four ways of pushing the law to its limit:

A

Mobilizing social movements, class action lawsuits, advance collective rights, combat structural inequality/tension in law:

67
Q

Class action lawsuits

A

one person/group as representative plaintiff for much larger group- act on behalf of others, move away from individualistic focus

68
Q

Combat structural inequality/tension in law

A

raise awareness of law’s inequality by showing how capitalism is inherently unequal- then chip away at it

LAWS1001 (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions