THEME 4 Flashcards

1
Q

Globalisation

A

The growing interdependency and integration of countries both economically and socially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Impacts of globalisation on consumers

A

More choice/quality of goods/services
Cheaper goods/services
More job opportunities
Enrichment
BUT
Exploitation of labour
Western job losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impacts of globalisation on producers

A

Producers in saturated markets can expand to untapped markets
Cheaper labour/other factors of production (offshoring)
Better labour
BUT
Small, local firms get outcompeted
Difficult to control/diseconomies of scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Impacts of globalisation on the government

A

PUTS PACOS

Less poverty in the world
Less unemployment
More tax revenue
More social cohesion between countries
BUT
Pollution
Tax avoidance by MNCs
Culture loss
Overdependence on exports/imports
Spread of economic shocks e.g. 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factors contributing to globalisation

A

Improvements in Transportation (cheaper to move abroad –> global/domestic markets closer in price)
Improvements in Tech/Communications (e-commerce; cheaper international calls)
Reduction of Trade Barriers; Trading Blocs (less protectionism; EU/NAFTA/APEC etc. –> economies of scale…)
Deregulation of markets and increased capital mobility
Increased significance of MNCs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Phillips Curve

A

A curve that shows the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment

Low U –> shortage of labour –> higher wage demands –> higher wage inflation

Draw diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stagflation

A

Inflation accompanied by stagnation in the rate of growth of output and an increase in unemployment in the economy; simultaneous increases in the inflation rate and the unemployment rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conflicts between objectives

A

BoP/Growth (Growth –> more consumption –> more imports [esp. if high mpm])
Inflation/Growth (Growth –> more spending/AD –> demand-pull inflation)
Distribution of Income/Growth (Growth –> assets more valuable –> rich gain more than poor)
Employment/Inflation (Phillips curve)
Environment/Growth (Growth –> more production –> more emissions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Absolute advantage

A

the ability to produce more of a given product using a given amount of resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Comparative advantage

A

The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of specialisation and trade

A

Lower price
More choice
Larger markets/EoS
Higher economic growth and living standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disadvantages of specialisation and trade

A

STUDM

Poss trade deficit if domestic G&S are uncompetitive
Higher unemployment
Unbalanced development
Global monopolies get larger
Spread of economic shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arguments for international trade

A

Increased access of producers to larger markets
International division of labour
Domestic producers more efficient due to foreign competition
More goods at lower prices
Technology spillover - developing countries can catch up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments against international trade

A

Can’t rely on foreign countries where national security is concerned e.g. food
Some industries forced out of business
Economies hurt by sudden changes in global demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Protectionism

A

The reduction of imports by a government through the imposition of high tariffs or quotas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasons for protectionism

A

Raise tax revenue
Protect infant industries
Protect geriatric industries
Protect employment
Retaliation
Protect strategic industries
Correct BoP disequilibrium
Protect the environment
Prevent dumping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Costs of protectionism

A

Higher prices/less choice for consumers
Inefficient resource allocation (distorts comparative advantage)
Regressive effect on distribution of income (tariffs fall on food, clothes etc., which low income households spend a lot on)
Production inefficiencies due to less competition
Trade wars
Difficulty of removing barriers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Methods of trade barriers + effects

A

Tariffs (deadweight loss)
Quotas (prices rise; imports fall; domestic output rises; NO tax revenue; loss of business to some importers; revenue to remaining importers up)
Embargoes (domestic output up; prices rise)
Rules/Regulations (increased costs for importers)
Domestic subsidies (reduces costs for domestic producers)
Preferential procurement policies (eliminates competition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluation of protectionist methods

DREAD

A

DREAD

Deadweight welfare loss/producer & consumer surplus
Potential retaliation, regressive effects, inefficiencies etc.
Elasticity of D&S
Amount of the tariff
Ability of domestic firms to increase output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Case against import controls

A

‘Second best’ way of controlling trade
Welfare loss for consumers
Higher costs too for importers of components/technology
World multiplier effects from reduction in trade
Threat of retaliation
Import controls cushions X-inefficiency - act as a barrier to entry
Bureaucratic cost of administering and enforcing import controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

International competitiveness

A

The ability to sell quality goods and services at competitive prices in foreign countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Main measures of international competitiveness

A

Unit labour costs (ULC) - improves when wage costs fall, worker skills/education improves, workers become more productive
Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) from WEF
Real exchange rate
Terms of trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Factors determining international competitiveness

FIR SUITS

A

FIR SUITS

Labour flexibility
Innovation
Regulation
Labour skills
ULCs
Infrastructure
Tax regimes
Economic stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Benefits of international competitiveness

A

Households: employment; wage growth; higher purchasing power
Firms: more FDI; higher demand; higher profit
Government: current account surplus; employment; fiscal improvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Economic effects of a fall in competitiveness

A

Unemployment - fall in exports (depends on new export markets being found; elasticity of goods)
Deterioration of BoP (but ER will adjust; does it really matter?)
Fall in actual economic growth (depends on other AD components)
Price levels fall
Impact on investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Balance of payments

A

Record of all UK financial transactions between the UK and other countries over a year
Current account; capital account; financial account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Current Account

A

Trade in goods
Trade in services
Investment income
Transfers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Capital account

A

Government investment grants; purchase and sale of patents; trade marks and land for foreign embassies; debt forgiveness; currency trading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Financial account

A

Portfolio investment (buying bonds and shares) and direct investment (buying land and factories)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Reasons for a BoP deficit

A

High value of sterling
Cheap imports - changing comparative advantage
Recession in EU/Rest of World
Increased UK income - economic growth
Poor quality/design/reliability/availability of UK goods - R&D gap
Insufficient productive capacity from UK suppliers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Reasons for a BoP surplus

A

A world boom causing an increase in demand for UK exports

A recession in the domestic economy causing a lower demand for imports

Improved quality, design, reliability and availability of UK goods

Weak pound making UK goods internationally competitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

2015 election - policies regarding international competitiveness

A

Need access to finance - hard for small/medium sized firm post-2008
Need access to expertise - R&D; Labour ideas implemented by the coalition - catapult centres which bring firms together to progress in the industry and target technological research
All parties had similar innovation policies
Differences: Labour wanted to increase corp tax; Tories wanted to keep it the same
Too much emphasis on debt: interest payments cause profits to fall, making corp tax fall
Crowdfunding, shares, venture capital etc. would be better for innovation
Labour proposed a small business administration like in the USA
Curcial for long-term prosperity (more investment, infrastructure, education)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Supply side policies to boost international competitiveness

A

Tax incentives for firms to increase R&D expenditure (May not invest though)

Education & training (better skills/occupational mobility) (Time lag)

Privatisation (may be inefficient; not much left to privatise)

Public spending on infrastructure (opportunity cost; time lag; can they afford it?)

Deregulation; lower corp tax (Unintended consequences)

Lower benefits/income tax (hurts the poor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Demand side policies to boost international competitiveness

A

Exchange rate policies (not a free economy)

Control inflation; macroeconomic stability –> encourage investment; keep prices low (difficult)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Impacts of a Current Account deficit

A

Higher standard of living
Better quality goods
BUT
Negative impact on AD and a fall in growth - long term if supply-side causes? (only if deficit is big; could be consequence of strong growth, so good)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Impacts of a Current Account surplus

A

Increase in international competitiveness
Greater confidence in the UK economy
Greater FDI
Exporting producers benefit –> employment
BUT
Inflationary pressure because injections are high relative to leakages
Increase in the value of the pound –> fall in international competitiveness
Living standards may fall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Economic policies to reduce a trade gap

A

Cyclical element of the deficit tends to be self-correcting
Lower ER improves the trade balance after a time lag, but this depends on the PED/PES for UK output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Marshall-Lerner condition

A

WIDEC only applies if PEDx + PEDm > 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Causes of a Current Account deficit

A

Demand-side: Strong domestic growth, overseas recession, strong pound
Supply-side: low productivity, low investment, high relative inflation, high labour costs, poor quality products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Policies to reduce a Current Account deficit

A

Expenditure-reduction and expenditure-switching
Caused by high demand for imports: tighten fiscal and monetary policy BUT may conflict with other objectives e.g. growth; depends on multiplier and confidence
Caused by price: protectionism BUT retaliation; WTO conflicts; imported inflation; X-inefficiency
Caused by strong pound: depreciation BUT Marshall-Lerner; J curve; imported inflation; floating rate; retaliation
Can use supply-side policies BUT time lag; no guarantee of success; expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

J-curve

A

PED for imports/exports inelastic in the short run, so a depreciation leads to a worsening deficit until contracts expire etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Exchange rate

A

The rate at which one currency is converted into another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Factors determining the exchange rate

A

GESTIC FRIG

Growth relative to other countries
Exports of goods/services (X up –> D£ up –> ER up)
Speculation or special factors such as political events
Trade performance with other countries
IR differentials (hot money flows)
Central bank official buying and selling
FDI inflows and outflows
Relative inflation (low inflation implies stability)
Imports of goods/services (M down –> D£ up –> ER up)
Government finances (confidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Free floating exchange rate

A

Value determined purely by supply and demand
Trade flows and capital flows affect the ER
No target for ER and no central bank intervention
Sterling floated since UK suspended ERM membership in 1992
Bank of England not intervened to influence ER since independence in 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Managed floating exchange rate

A

Value determined by market supply and demand
Some market intervention
Governments normally engage in managed floating if not part of a fixed ER system (pursued in the UK from 1973-1990)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Fully-fixed exchange rate

A

Pegged
Countries can improve competitiveness by cutting costs below other countries, knowing ER will be stable
Need large currency reserves to make this work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Benefits of a floating currency

A

Low need for foreign currency reserves
Freedom to set policy IR to meet domestic objectives
May help prevent imported inflation
Insulates an economy after an external shock, especially if export-dependent
Partial automatic correction for a current account deficit
Less risk of speculative attack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Benefits of a fixed currency

A

Certainty –> confidence for inward investment
Low costs of currency hedging for businesses
Stability helps control inflation
Can lead to lower borrowing costs (lower yields on bonds)
Imposes responsibility on government policies
Less speculation if the fixed ER is credible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Benefits of a strong currency

A

Lower import prices - higher living standards
Higher real purchasing power overseas
Cheaper raw materials –> SRAS up
Helps control inflation (tough competition for domestic producers; fall in imported input costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Costs of a strong currency

A

Cheaper imports leads to rising import penetration and larger trade deficit
UK exporters lose price competitiveness and global market share - difficult to recover
Damages profits/employment in sectors such as manufacturing
Negative impact on growth in the medium term
Some regions affected more than others - different export dependency; exposure to import competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Reasons for public expenditure

A

Efficiency and market failure: some markets (e.g. public goods) are allocatively inefficient. Others productively inefficient - a monopsony (e.g. NHS) can fix that
Equity and equality: certain goods have unequal burdens e.g. healthcare for elderly; education for poor
Macroeconomic management: Free market doesn’t account for externalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Reasons for changing size/composition of public expenditure

A

Income elastic (low income less revenue; high income high demand for more/better services)
Ideology (USA spends 38% GDP; Finland 58%)
Population (ageing e.g. Japan less productive; need more spending)
Economic crises (austerity post-2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Current and capital expenditure and transfer payments

A

Capital expenditure: spending on long-term investment goods (infrastructure)
Current expenditure: government consumption + transfer payments + debt interest
Transfer payments: mainly welfare, not included in GDP because there is no corresponding output
A current expenditure deficit is undesirable because the burden of borrowing will fall on future generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Can government spending improve living standards and equality?

A

Government efficiency: with the right controls/incentives, govt can be allocatively, productively and dynamically efficient. However, no profit motive
Disincentive effects: high tax/spend discourages work, so should be small. However, Nordic countries have similar activity rates/growth as UK/USA
Utility: principal-agent problem between politicians and taxpayers. However, this is because taxpayers would not make decisions in their best interests (public goods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Crowding out

A

If an economy is operating on its PPF curve, an increase in public spending will crowd out the private sector
Even below full employment, govt borrowing money to spend can lead to financial crowding out - higher D for finance –> higher IR –> less borrowing by firms to invest
May not happen: transfer payments don’t increase output; high U leads to crowding in (multiplier); could lead to growth, shifting PPF outwards, allowing for private sector growth
Free market economics disagree: higher tax is discouraging; low multiplier –> crowding in unlikely; public investment inefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Advantages of government borrowing

A

Spending on public services benefits people. Education is a supply side policy, increasing economic growth
Extra G increases GDP –> more tax revenue
Improvements in living standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Disadvantages of government borrowing

A

STOIC

Spending cuts to reduce the deficit
Increase tax to repay the debt - unpopular and reduce consumption
Opportunity cost of higher interest repayments
Danger of inflation
Potential ‘crowding out’ effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Composition of govt spending

A

Current spending on goods & services
Capital spending
Transfer spending
Interest on debt repayments

59
Q

Reasons for government spending

A

Provision of public and merit goods
Redistribution of income and wealth
Influencing regional resource allocation and industrial efficiency (done via regional policy)
Influencing the level of economic activity

60
Q

Macro benefits of state spending

A

AD injection into the circular flow
Boosts AD during slowdown
Regional employment increases due to investment
Improvements in LRAS from better national infrastructure/education/healthcare

61
Q

Micro benefits of state spending

A

A PIPE

Wider access to public/merit goods - living standards, econ. welfare up
Improved public service funding
Income inequality down if real value of welfare benefits rises
Relative poverty down if benefits low income families
Externality effects e.g. from better public transport and healthcare

62
Q

Factors influencing the size and pattern of govt spending

A

Level of GDP (more revenue; less demand)
Size and age distribution of population (higher pop. –> more pressure on services; ageing pop?)
Political priorities
Redistribution of income
Need for discretionary fiscal policy e.g. post-2008
Debt interest

63
Q

Hypothecated tax

A

A tax that is raised for a specific purpose

64
Q

Pigouvian tax

A

Tax to correct a negative externality (internalise it)

65
Q

Stealth tax

A

A new tax/tax rise introduced in a way that is difficult to notice it

66
Q

Fiscal drag

A

When tax allowances do not rise in line with prices and incomes

67
Q

Effect of an increase in income tax

A

Fairer income distribution
Lower incentive to work
Less economic activity
More tax revenue (Laffer curve)

68
Q

Effect of an increase in VAT

A

Worse income distribution
Greater incentive to work - need to
Tax revenue depends on elasticity
Inflationary wage-price spiral
Leakage –> less economic activity

69
Q

Absolute poverty

A

An absence of sufficient income to access basic human needs
Poverty line $1.90 a day (~800mn people)

Objective measure
Same standard across different locations/time periods
However, minimum level of income to meet basic needs varies by time and location

70
Q

Relative poverty

A

Lower standard of living than those around you
EU measure: below 60% median income

Allows comparison within a country
However, highly subjective; can change over time; can’t compare between countries; doesn’t take needs into account (pensioners have low income but low needs - mortgage paid off)

71
Q

Composite measures of poverty

A

HPI-1 (% not expected to reach 40; % that are illiterate; % of illiterate children; % that don’t have access to safe water and healthcare)
HPI-2 (Probability at birth of not surviving to 60; Adult literacy rate; population in relative poverty; rate of long-term unemployment)

72
Q

Lorenz curve

A

Graph showing how much the actual distribution of income differs from an equal distribution

73
Q

Gini Coefficient

A

Measure of inequality on a Lorenz curve. Higher = less equal
A/(A+B)

74
Q

Causes of inequality

A

AUSPICATE
Access to capital to start businesses
Unemployment
Social benefits
Pay differences
Inheritance
Corruption
Assets
Tax system
Education

75
Q

Consequences of inequality
SASHI

A

SASHI
Social consequences e.g. high crime rate
Access to capital - low for poor
Savings low (poor)
High poverty
Imports (rich)

76
Q

Interventionist policies to reduce inequality

MITSC

A

MITSC
Minimum wage - MW £7.70; LW £8.21 - boosts work incentives/take-home pay BUT might cost jobs; higher prices
Income tax - 45% might rise to 50% - progressive tax reduces inequality BUT risks brain drain/tax avoidance
Training - apprenticeship levy since 2017 - Helps raise productivity, jobs and real wages BUT time lag; free rider problem (?)
Service provision - NHS, state education - Access to merit goods not based on ability to pay BUT universal access less effective than targeted provision
Child care - £2,000 a year per child - improve incentives for mothers to work BUT quality of child care needs improving

77
Q

Causes of poverty in the UK

A

WASSUP P
Wages (low for unskilled/casual work)
Age (elderly have no income; imperfect information –> low pension investment; health)
Sickness & disability (can’t work as much; unemployable)
Social stigma around benefits –> might not claim; paperwork
Unemployment (long term –> unemployable)
Poverty trap (disincentive to look for work; job –> tax)
Parenthood (alone: leave child alone or no income)

78
Q

Causes of poverty in developing countries

A

Natural: Floods, famines, volcanoes, earthquakes, tornadoes, drought, inaccessible location, few natural resources etc.

Manmade: GOBEFACEUP - Govt policies; Overpopulation; Barriers to trade; Environmental degradation; Forced migration; Advice from IMF bad; Corruption; Exploitation; Unemployment; Political strife

79
Q

Consequences of poverty

A

Physical/mental health issues
Lower life expectancy
Bad education/less likely to stay in education

80
Q

Causes of change in absolute and relative poverty

A

GDP rises reduces absolute poverty, but often hurts relative poverty (depends on welfare state etc.)
Relative changes because of market force impacts on wages and wealth; changes in benefits and tax levels

81
Q

Relationships between causes of poverty

A

Debt/Unfair trade: unfair trade means LEDCs can never pay their debts off
Debt/War: must borrow to buy weapons
Disease/War: war creates dirty conditions and lack of stability for healthcare, making disease spread
Education/War: schools become dangerous; learning becomes difficult; kids at war
Education/status of women: Women don’t get education, so they can’t contribute to the economy

82
Q

Economic development

A

Cannot be defined precisely
Takes into account the quality of growth, not just the quantity (living standards; sustainability; freedom of choices)

83
Q

Indicators of a developed country

A

Can satisfy basic human needs
Opportunity to raise standard of living
Freedom to make choices
Growth is sustainable

84
Q

Indicators of a developing country

A

Focus on individual survival
Basic human needs barely met
Poor healthcare and sanitation
Low levels of education
Gender inequalities
Poor and unstable governance

85
Q

Indicators of development

A

Real GDP
Income equality
HDI (education, life expectancy, income etc.)
Access to clean water, internet; size of tertiary sector
HPI? (life expectancy, wellbeing, ecological footprint)

86
Q

What is HDI?

A

UN measure of development that attempts to rank all countries. The goals of development considered are standard of living (GDP per capita); Longevity (life expectancy); knowledge (adult literacy/enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education)

87
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of HDI

A

Reliable/easy to obtain indicators
Takes income into account, but qualified by cost of living
Figures recorded with consistency
With GDP and HDI, assumptions on healthcare and education can be made
Can judge success of govt policies
BUT
Fails to take into account income equality
Large disparities may exist between regions, genders or ethnicities
Life expectancy doesn’t tell us about quality of life
Knowledge is academic only - practical knowledge?
Omits important factors e.g. democratic freedom, HR abuses

88
Q

Human capital

A

The knowledge and skills embodied in individuals that facilitate the creation of personal, social and economic wellbeing

89
Q

Importance of high quality human capital

A

AT BAT
Attractive to MNCs because of lower costs in training workers
Training –> greater productivity
Basic needs of the economy met e.g. lorry drivers being able to read
Adaptable economy if flexible
Technological change contributions

90
Q

Constraints on human capital improvement

A

Government can’t afford education investment
Families too poor to send children to school
Culture e.g. lack of education for girls
AIDS/HIV (parents leave work, so children leave school; teachers leave work; MNCs pull out due to unprofitability)

91
Q

Weaknesses of human capital investment

A

Very expensive
Long run nature of the investment (ILO: hard focus on education would cause “a protracted period, approximately 15 years, of net costs”)
Brain drain

92
Q

Primary Product Dependency with examples

A

When a country is dependent on a single finite commodity
Most developing countries concentrate production on the primary sector (SSA: 95% of exports are primary products)
Can be hard commodities (copper, tin, iron ore) or soft (wheat, palm oil, rice, fruit)

2010 % of exports:
Angola: 97% oil
Zambia: 84% copper
Tanzania: 37% gold
Ghana: 39% gold, 26% oil, 17% cocoa

93
Q

Issues with Primary Product Dependency

A

P-P-P-P-PEN
Price fluctuations
Price naturally falls (supply naturally increases; demand falls as synthetic materials can be used)
Producer incomes and foreign exchange earnings fluctuate
Planning investment is difficult (uncertainty)
Protectionism can destroy an economy
Elasticity (Income inelastic products - Prebisch Singer)
Natural disasters can cause quick jolts

94
Q

Evaluation of PPD

A

Some countries have developed on the basis of their primary products e.g. UAE (when price is high, they can make a lot of money and reinvest it in diversification)
Some countries have natural resources with growing demand e.g. Congolese cobalt used in phones/electric cars
Comparative advantage
Food prices likely to rise because world population is rising, so demand for agricultural products rises, benefiting farmers

95
Q

Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis

A

The argument that countries exporting primary commodities will face declining terms of trade in the long run due to primary goods being income inelastic, which will trap them in a low level of development as more and more exports will need to be sold to ‘pay for’ the same volume of imports of secondary sector or capital goods.

96
Q

Terms of Trade

A

(Export prices/Import prices)*100
Ratio between the price of goods a country exports compared to those it imports
Countries export certain goods and need those earnings to fund imports
If ToT improves, the country can buy more imports with money from exports, and vice versa
Depends on elasticity (Elastic exports: ToT improves –> XD falls –> revenue falls)

97
Q

Thomas Malthus

A

Eighteenth-century English intellectual who warned that population growth threatened future generations because, in his view, population growth would always outstrip increases in agricultural production.

98
Q

Problems with population growth

A

GFUCW
GDP per capita falls
Food
Unemployment rises
Crime rates rise
Wages fall

99
Q

Benefits of population growth

A

Higher output
Cheap labour attracts FDI
Higher tax revenues

100
Q

Infrastructure and issues if it’s low quality

A

Transport - inability to transfer goods reduces trade; may reduce chances of kids getting to school; high supply costs and delays for businesses; reduces mobility of labour
Public utilities - power failures disrupt production; sanitation and clean water vital for good health
Public services - need for effective emergency services and adequate schooling/healthcare
Communications - inability to coordinate economic activity; underdeveloped radio/TV/internet makes communities insular

101
Q

Impacts of bad infrastructure

A

Higher supply costs
Delays for businesses
Reduces labour mobility

Need to invest more to deal with climate change (1901-1910 82 natural disasters; 2003-2012 >4,000)

102
Q

Examples of bad infrastructure

A

India: Irrigation is bad, making food production hard to sustain, especially when there is little rain e.g. 2012 - farms had to draw more power to pump water, and hydroelectric plants had less supply, leading to a blackout which left >700mn people without power
Brazil: 2011 - only 14% of roads were paved in 2011
SSA: combined power generation capacity of 48 countries is 68GW - about the same as Spain. 47 without South Africa: 28GW - about the same as Argentina. Africa only invests about 4% GDP into infrastructure

103
Q

Corruption

A

Dishonest exploitation of power for personal gain

104
Q

Types of corruption

A

Embezzlement, bribes, seizure of property, fraud, nepotism, spending on political aims e.g. weapons

105
Q

Where corruption occurs

A

Govt not accountable
Large-scale capital investment projects (payoffs unnoticed)
Accounting practices poorly formulated
Officials not well-paid
Elections not well-controlled
Weak legal structure
Lack of freedom of speech

106
Q

Effects of corruption

A

CAMEL PITS
Cost of business rises
Allocation of resources unfair
Monetary gains may be moved out the country
Environmental impacts
Legal system ineffective
Public funds wasted
Investment falls due to risk of contracts not being honoured
Trust in the economy falls
Small bribes reduce citizens’ economic wellbeing

Just 5 of top-25 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index are non-OECD

107
Q

Poor governance

A

Government failure - rulers of a country adopt policies that result in the country’s resources being allocated inefficiently, restricting growth

108
Q

Connection of civil war to PPD

A

A country at ‘peak danger’, with commodities comprising 32% of GDP, has a 22% risk of falling into civil war in a given 5-year period, which a country with no primary commodity exports has a 1% risk.
It is easy to capture and control the output of a gold mine or oil field compared to a sector of garment manufacturing or hospitality services.

109
Q

Connection of civil war to human capital

A

Young males (majority of combatants) are less likely to join a rebellion if they are being educated and/or have a comfortable salary, and can reasonably assume that they will prosper in the future

110
Q

Effects of political instability/conflict

A

Uncertainty –> potential economic breakdown
Unlikely to receive FDI, or even aid
Loss of life, damage to infrastructure, displacement of population, loss of investment/aid, impact on education, impact on healthcare etc.
Examples: Sudan, Iraq, Rwanda, Somalia, Turkey…

111
Q

Causes of debt

A

Legacy of colonialism (Indonesian independence in 1949 required assuming Dutch debt, much of it from fighting pro-independence rebels; Haiti paid 150mn francs for independence)
Odious debt (civil wars in Guatemala, El Salvador, Colombia; apartheid regime in South Africa; Duvaliers in Haiti) - should be written off?
1973 oil crisis (LEDCs had to borrow, and banks funded by OPEC deposits lent. Much of the borrowing was odious. 1970-92: LEDC debt up 2000%)
War
Decisions to borrow for major investment projects when economy was strong; borrowing money speculating export prices would rise, and being wrong (Zambia); currency depreciation

112
Q

Ability to finance debt

A

Japan debt $2.2tn, 42% GDP
Liberia debt $3.2bn (606% GDP)

113
Q

Problems with debt

A

SOURCE
Servicing the debt
Opportunity cost
Unsustainable debt (not used to increase export earnings)
Repayment ability
Conditions on borrowing
Expenditure on debt

114
Q

Debt cancellation

A

Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative 1996
Debt forgiveness if the country commits to ‘good’ policies for growth e.g. investing in people, free market practices, widening export base
By end of 2009, 35/41 identified countries benefited; $130bn cancelled
JUBILEE DEBT CAMPAIGN

115
Q

Advantages of debt forgiveness

A

SPUD FARM

Stability –> more FDI
Poverty alleviated
Unfair odious debt relieved
Development of infrastructure/human capital
Foreign exchange gap shrinks –> more investment
Aid less needed in the future
Rich countries benefit (exports)
Mutual gains e.g. environment better looked after

116
Q

Disadvantages of debt forgiveness

A

CAD GUM

Corrupt misuse?
Appropriate? May need conditions e.g. HIPC
Dependency culture
Govt policies needed as well to reduce poverty
Unfair to countries that managed finances well
Moral hazard

117
Q

Policies to boost development

A

Inward looking (protectionism; subsidies; restrict MNC activity) e.g. USSR, India (ISI economics pre-1990)
Outward looking (no protectionism; promote MNC activity; permit labour mobility; free trade; deregulation)

118
Q

Benefits and costs of inward looking policies to boost development

A

Self-reliance; develop while preserving culture; necessary forerunner to international trade (infant industries); preserve traditional forms of life
BUT
Distorts comparative advantage; Lack of competition; higher prices; consumer surplus falls

119
Q

Benefits and costs of outward looking policies to boost development

A

Welfare gains from tariff reduction; competition forces efficiency; benefit from world growth; EoS; qualify for World Bank aid
BUT
Infant industries can’t develop; deregulation –> collusion; brain drain; no gains from MNC profit (repatriated); tax incentives for FDI –> low revenue

120
Q

Interventionist approaches to development + criticisms

A

Import substitution; nationalisation; farmers forced to sell to the state at low prices; subsidies; over-valued exchange rates; encourage MNC activity
BUT
Slow growth; no profit motive –> inefficiency; govt failure; corruption?; fiscal deficit; BoP deficit

121
Q

Free market approaches to development + criticisms

A

Trade liberalisation; market liberalisation; supply-side policies; SAPs
BUT
Asymmetric information; externalities; absence of property rights (tragedy of the commons); investment decisions

122
Q

Aid

A

The voluntary transfer of resources from one country to another, or loans given on concessionary terms
Bilateral, multilateral, NGO, tied aid, emergency aid

123
Q

Advantages of aid

A

KID HARM

Kick-start economic development
Inequalities between countries shrink
Develop infrastructure –> investment
Human capital improvement
Absolute poverty reduced
Rebuilding disaster stricken areas
Multiplier effect

124
Q

Disadvantages of aid

ACID PIC

A

ACID PIC
Allocative inefficiency (distorts market forces)
Crowding out of domestic investment
Imperialistic uses through conditions
Dependency culture
Postpones economic restructuring
Ineffective due to limited resources
Corruption

125
Q

Harrod-Domar model

A

A model of economic growth that emphasises the importance of savings and investment

126
Q

FDI

A

The acquisition of non-financial assets of a country by foreign countries
Involves a flow of capital to build a factory, buy a business, or buy land/buildings

127
Q

Why are firms attracted to LEDCs?

A

Cheap labour/resources
Low tax
Subsidies
Setting up inside a customs union
Expanding market scope
Weak regulation

128
Q

Advantages of FDI

A

HER SPASM

Develops human capital
Provides employment
Government revenues up
Spillover effects e.g. copying tech
Higher labour productivity –> higher wages than from local firms
Access to world class tech and management
Crucial source of investment funds to encourage savings (Harrod-Domar)
Regional multiplier effects

129
Q

Disadvantages of FDI

A

Flaws in job creation (not many jobs due to capital tech; expats for managers, leaving only low paying unskilled work for locals)
Outcompetes local companies
Exploits job-hungry workers
Environmental risks taken
Race to the bottom –> low tax revenue
Repatriated profits
Deals with repressive political regimes

130
Q

Fair trade

A

Aims to reduce exploitation of producers, by giving them a ‘fair price’ for their product

Workers from co-operatives to get better bargaining power with MNCs
Businesses signing up to the ‘fairtrade’ label must treat workers well, take care of the envt etc. Pay a ‘fair price’ for the goods, plus a ‘premium’ to improve the product or the area e.g. schools
Fairtrade Foundation gives these firms certification to alleviate a consumer’s guilty conscience

131
Q

Benefits of fair trade

A

Guarantees the farmer a certain income
Protects farmers from price fluctuations
Money can be spent on improving the product/production methods, increasing competitiveness
Money can be invested into education, health, infrastructure etc.
Farmers not subject to monopsony power from developed countries

132
Q

Drawbacks of fair trade

A

Can be ‘middle men’ involved, reducing the benefit
Not all farmers benefit (awareness, membership fees etc.)
Market distortions - low price indicates oversupply
Reduces incentives to improve quality/productivity
Co-operatives discourage private enterprise
Dependency trap

133
Q

Alternatives to fair trade

A

Minimum price schemes
Minimum wage
Subsidy
Regulation
Unions

134
Q

Buffer stock schemes

A

A situation where a government intervenes to stabilise prices, often in markets for commodities (raw materials) e.g. agriculture, buy setting ceiling and floor prices. They influence these by buying/selling the needed amount to shift prices

135
Q

Criticisms of buffer stock schemes

A

Floor price too high –> constant surpluses
Ceiling price too low –> insufficient stocks
Costs of storage
All major producers must cooperate; no cheating

136
Q

Lewis model

A

A development approach which encourages the movement of labour from agriculture to industry (Marginal productivity in agriculture near 0 due to excess supply –> OC of moving = 0)

137
Q

Criticisms of the Lewis model

A

Industrial profits may not be invested locally, especially if made by TNCs
Reinvestment in capital equipment would hurt
Assumption of surplus labour in agriculture is unfair e.g. favelas in South America

138
Q

Financial sector

A

Connects lenders with borrowers through bond/stock markets, or intermediaries (commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, mutual funds etc.)

139
Q

Market failure in the financial sector

A

When financial markets fail to allocate financial products at the socially optimum level of output. This is a misallocation of resources

140
Q

Deregulation of financial markets

A

Lower reserve requirements (abolished in the UK in 1981); allowing commercial and investment banks to be joined, leading to a higher risk of bank failure

141
Q

Causes of financial market failure

A

Excessive risk by banks
Collusion to fix loan rates for self interest (LIBOR)
Monopoly pricing

142
Q

Types of financial market failure

A

SMEAR

Speculation and market bubbles (Buy low, sell high; wrongly high predictions can create bubbles e.g. housing/bitcoin, which then bursts)
Moral hazard - too big to fail
Negative externalities e.g. cost to taxpayer of bailout (£27bn estimated); loss of savings; lost jobs, income and growth in the economy
Asymmetric information (regulators don’t know what banks are doing)
Market rigging (LIBOR, FOREX)

143
Q

Role of the central bank

A

Implement monetary policy
Bank for the government
Bank for commercial banks
Regulate financial industry