THEME 4 Flashcards
Globalisation
The growing interdependency and integration of countries both economically and socially
Impacts of globalisation on consumers
More choice/quality of goods/services
Cheaper goods/services
More job opportunities
Enrichment
BUT
Exploitation of labour
Western job losses
Impacts of globalisation on producers
Producers in saturated markets can expand to untapped markets
Cheaper labour/other factors of production (offshoring)
Better labour
BUT
Small, local firms get outcompeted
Difficult to control/diseconomies of scale
Impacts of globalisation on the government
PUTS PACOS
Less poverty in the world
Less unemployment
More tax revenue
More social cohesion between countries
BUT
Pollution
Tax avoidance by MNCs
Culture loss
Overdependence on exports/imports
Spread of economic shocks e.g. 2008
Factors contributing to globalisation
Improvements in Transportation (cheaper to move abroad –> global/domestic markets closer in price)
Improvements in Tech/Communications (e-commerce; cheaper international calls)
Reduction of Trade Barriers; Trading Blocs (less protectionism; EU/NAFTA/APEC etc. –> economies of scale…)
Deregulation of markets and increased capital mobility
Increased significance of MNCs
Phillips Curve
A curve that shows the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment
Low U –> shortage of labour –> higher wage demands –> higher wage inflation
Draw diagram
Stagflation
Inflation accompanied by stagnation in the rate of growth of output and an increase in unemployment in the economy; simultaneous increases in the inflation rate and the unemployment rate.
Conflicts between objectives
BoP/Growth (Growth –> more consumption –> more imports [esp. if high mpm])
Inflation/Growth (Growth –> more spending/AD –> demand-pull inflation)
Distribution of Income/Growth (Growth –> assets more valuable –> rich gain more than poor)
Employment/Inflation (Phillips curve)
Environment/Growth (Growth –> more production –> more emissions)
Absolute advantage
the ability to produce more of a given product using a given amount of resources
Comparative advantage
The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost
Advantages of specialisation and trade
Lower price
More choice
Larger markets/EoS
Higher economic growth and living standards
Disadvantages of specialisation and trade
STUDM
Poss trade deficit if domestic G&S are uncompetitive
Higher unemployment
Unbalanced development
Global monopolies get larger
Spread of economic shocks
Arguments for international trade
Increased access of producers to larger markets
International division of labour
Domestic producers more efficient due to foreign competition
More goods at lower prices
Technology spillover - developing countries can catch up
Arguments against international trade
Can’t rely on foreign countries where national security is concerned e.g. food
Some industries forced out of business
Economies hurt by sudden changes in global demand
Protectionism
The reduction of imports by a government through the imposition of high tariffs or quotas
Reasons for protectionism
Raise tax revenue
Protect infant industries
Protect geriatric industries
Protect employment
Retaliation
Protect strategic industries
Correct BoP disequilibrium
Protect the environment
Prevent dumping
Costs of protectionism
Higher prices/less choice for consumers
Inefficient resource allocation (distorts comparative advantage)
Regressive effect on distribution of income (tariffs fall on food, clothes etc., which low income households spend a lot on)
Production inefficiencies due to less competition
Trade wars
Difficulty of removing barriers
Methods of trade barriers + effects
Tariffs (deadweight loss)
Quotas (prices rise; imports fall; domestic output rises; NO tax revenue; loss of business to some importers; revenue to remaining importers up)
Embargoes (domestic output up; prices rise)
Rules/Regulations (increased costs for importers)
Domestic subsidies (reduces costs for domestic producers)
Preferential procurement policies (eliminates competition)
Evaluation of protectionist methods
DREAD
DREAD
Deadweight welfare loss/producer & consumer surplus
Potential retaliation, regressive effects, inefficiencies etc.
Elasticity of D&S
Amount of the tariff
Ability of domestic firms to increase output
Case against import controls
‘Second best’ way of controlling trade
Welfare loss for consumers
Higher costs too for importers of components/technology
World multiplier effects from reduction in trade
Threat of retaliation
Import controls cushions X-inefficiency - act as a barrier to entry
Bureaucratic cost of administering and enforcing import controls
International competitiveness
The ability to sell quality goods and services at competitive prices in foreign countries
Main measures of international competitiveness
Unit labour costs (ULC) - improves when wage costs fall, worker skills/education improves, workers become more productive
Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) from WEF
Real exchange rate
Terms of trade
Factors determining international competitiveness
FIR SUITS
FIR SUITS
Labour flexibility
Innovation
Regulation
Labour skills
ULCs
Infrastructure
Tax regimes
Economic stability
Benefits of international competitiveness
Households: employment; wage growth; higher purchasing power
Firms: more FDI; higher demand; higher profit
Government: current account surplus; employment; fiscal improvement
Economic effects of a fall in competitiveness
Unemployment - fall in exports (depends on new export markets being found; elasticity of goods)
Deterioration of BoP (but ER will adjust; does it really matter?)
Fall in actual economic growth (depends on other AD components)
Price levels fall
Impact on investment
Balance of payments
Record of all UK financial transactions between the UK and other countries over a year
Current account; capital account; financial account
Current Account
Trade in goods
Trade in services
Investment income
Transfers
Capital account
Government investment grants; purchase and sale of patents; trade marks and land for foreign embassies; debt forgiveness; currency trading
Financial account
Portfolio investment (buying bonds and shares) and direct investment (buying land and factories)
Reasons for a BoP deficit
High value of sterling
Cheap imports - changing comparative advantage
Recession in EU/Rest of World
Increased UK income - economic growth
Poor quality/design/reliability/availability of UK goods - R&D gap
Insufficient productive capacity from UK suppliers
Reasons for a BoP surplus
A world boom causing an increase in demand for UK exports
A recession in the domestic economy causing a lower demand for imports
Improved quality, design, reliability and availability of UK goods
Weak pound making UK goods internationally competitive
2015 election - policies regarding international competitiveness
Need access to finance - hard for small/medium sized firm post-2008
Need access to expertise - R&D; Labour ideas implemented by the coalition - catapult centres which bring firms together to progress in the industry and target technological research
All parties had similar innovation policies
Differences: Labour wanted to increase corp tax; Tories wanted to keep it the same
Too much emphasis on debt: interest payments cause profits to fall, making corp tax fall
Crowdfunding, shares, venture capital etc. would be better for innovation
Labour proposed a small business administration like in the USA
Curcial for long-term prosperity (more investment, infrastructure, education)
Supply side policies to boost international competitiveness
Tax incentives for firms to increase R&D expenditure (May not invest though)
Education & training (better skills/occupational mobility) (Time lag)
Privatisation (may be inefficient; not much left to privatise)
Public spending on infrastructure (opportunity cost; time lag; can they afford it?)
Deregulation; lower corp tax (Unintended consequences)
Lower benefits/income tax (hurts the poor)
Demand side policies to boost international competitiveness
Exchange rate policies (not a free economy)
Control inflation; macroeconomic stability –> encourage investment; keep prices low (difficult)
Impacts of a Current Account deficit
Higher standard of living
Better quality goods
BUT
Negative impact on AD and a fall in growth - long term if supply-side causes? (only if deficit is big; could be consequence of strong growth, so good)
Impacts of a Current Account surplus
Increase in international competitiveness
Greater confidence in the UK economy
Greater FDI
Exporting producers benefit –> employment
BUT
Inflationary pressure because injections are high relative to leakages
Increase in the value of the pound –> fall in international competitiveness
Living standards may fall
Economic policies to reduce a trade gap
Cyclical element of the deficit tends to be self-correcting
Lower ER improves the trade balance after a time lag, but this depends on the PED/PES for UK output
Marshall-Lerner condition
WIDEC only applies if PEDx + PEDm > 1
Causes of a Current Account deficit
Demand-side: Strong domestic growth, overseas recession, strong pound
Supply-side: low productivity, low investment, high relative inflation, high labour costs, poor quality products
Policies to reduce a Current Account deficit
Expenditure-reduction and expenditure-switching
Caused by high demand for imports: tighten fiscal and monetary policy BUT may conflict with other objectives e.g. growth; depends on multiplier and confidence
Caused by price: protectionism BUT retaliation; WTO conflicts; imported inflation; X-inefficiency
Caused by strong pound: depreciation BUT Marshall-Lerner; J curve; imported inflation; floating rate; retaliation
Can use supply-side policies BUT time lag; no guarantee of success; expensive
J-curve
PED for imports/exports inelastic in the short run, so a depreciation leads to a worsening deficit until contracts expire etc.
Exchange rate
The rate at which one currency is converted into another
Factors determining the exchange rate
GESTIC FRIG
Growth relative to other countries
Exports of goods/services (X up –> D£ up –> ER up)
Speculation or special factors such as political events
Trade performance with other countries
IR differentials (hot money flows)
Central bank official buying and selling
FDI inflows and outflows
Relative inflation (low inflation implies stability)
Imports of goods/services (M down –> D£ up –> ER up)
Government finances (confidence)
Free floating exchange rate
Value determined purely by supply and demand
Trade flows and capital flows affect the ER
No target for ER and no central bank intervention
Sterling floated since UK suspended ERM membership in 1992
Bank of England not intervened to influence ER since independence in 1997
Managed floating exchange rate
Value determined by market supply and demand
Some market intervention
Governments normally engage in managed floating if not part of a fixed ER system (pursued in the UK from 1973-1990)
Fully-fixed exchange rate
Pegged
Countries can improve competitiveness by cutting costs below other countries, knowing ER will be stable
Need large currency reserves to make this work
Benefits of a floating currency
Low need for foreign currency reserves
Freedom to set policy IR to meet domestic objectives
May help prevent imported inflation
Insulates an economy after an external shock, especially if export-dependent
Partial automatic correction for a current account deficit
Less risk of speculative attack
Benefits of a fixed currency
Certainty –> confidence for inward investment
Low costs of currency hedging for businesses
Stability helps control inflation
Can lead to lower borrowing costs (lower yields on bonds)
Imposes responsibility on government policies
Less speculation if the fixed ER is credible
Benefits of a strong currency
Lower import prices - higher living standards
Higher real purchasing power overseas
Cheaper raw materials –> SRAS up
Helps control inflation (tough competition for domestic producers; fall in imported input costs)
Costs of a strong currency
Cheaper imports leads to rising import penetration and larger trade deficit
UK exporters lose price competitiveness and global market share - difficult to recover
Damages profits/employment in sectors such as manufacturing
Negative impact on growth in the medium term
Some regions affected more than others - different export dependency; exposure to import competition
Reasons for public expenditure
Efficiency and market failure: some markets (e.g. public goods) are allocatively inefficient. Others productively inefficient - a monopsony (e.g. NHS) can fix that
Equity and equality: certain goods have unequal burdens e.g. healthcare for elderly; education for poor
Macroeconomic management: Free market doesn’t account for externalities
Reasons for changing size/composition of public expenditure
Income elastic (low income less revenue; high income high demand for more/better services)
Ideology (USA spends 38% GDP; Finland 58%)
Population (ageing e.g. Japan less productive; need more spending)
Economic crises (austerity post-2008)
Current and capital expenditure and transfer payments
Capital expenditure: spending on long-term investment goods (infrastructure)
Current expenditure: government consumption + transfer payments + debt interest
Transfer payments: mainly welfare, not included in GDP because there is no corresponding output
A current expenditure deficit is undesirable because the burden of borrowing will fall on future generations
Can government spending improve living standards and equality?
Government efficiency: with the right controls/incentives, govt can be allocatively, productively and dynamically efficient. However, no profit motive
Disincentive effects: high tax/spend discourages work, so should be small. However, Nordic countries have similar activity rates/growth as UK/USA
Utility: principal-agent problem between politicians and taxpayers. However, this is because taxpayers would not make decisions in their best interests (public goods)
Crowding out
If an economy is operating on its PPF curve, an increase in public spending will crowd out the private sector
Even below full employment, govt borrowing money to spend can lead to financial crowding out - higher D for finance –> higher IR –> less borrowing by firms to invest
May not happen: transfer payments don’t increase output; high U leads to crowding in (multiplier); could lead to growth, shifting PPF outwards, allowing for private sector growth
Free market economics disagree: higher tax is discouraging; low multiplier –> crowding in unlikely; public investment inefficient
Advantages of government borrowing
Spending on public services benefits people. Education is a supply side policy, increasing economic growth
Extra G increases GDP –> more tax revenue
Improvements in living standards
Disadvantages of government borrowing
STOIC
Spending cuts to reduce the deficit
Increase tax to repay the debt - unpopular and reduce consumption
Opportunity cost of higher interest repayments
Danger of inflation
Potential ‘crowding out’ effect