Theme 3.1 and 3.2: Business growth and objectives Flashcards
BUSINESSMANNNNNNN
Why do firms grow?
-Make more sales and profit
-Gain monopoly power
-Owner’s objectives
- Diversify and enjoy risk bearing economies
-Exploit internal economies of scale
Why do some firms not grow?
-Not enough finances
-Regulations put in place to stop firms from growing too big
-Niche markets
-Diseconomies of scale
-Profit satisfice
What is organic growth
When firms grow by investing in themselves to increase output
E.g apple reinvested their profits to launch new products or a bank loan
What is inorganic growth?
When firms grow by merging or acquiring another company
E.g. when Google bought YouTube for $1.6 billion in 2016 and then made money from YouTube’s ads
What are the pros and cons of organic growth?
Firstly, using a bank loan or reinvesting profit to grow organically, a firm’s owner will keep control over the company. So the owner will take most of the firm’s profit.
However, if the owner grows organically by selling lots of shares, they will lose ownership to the shareholders. If the owner sets up many franchises, they will lose control to their franchise managers.
Secondly, organic growth is low risk because the firm expands by increasing its output in a market it is already familiar with and selling a good/service it is already good at producing. Inorganic growth is a much higher risk because a firm might move into a completely new market.
However, organic growth can also mean slower growth. Whereas a firm can grow very quickly inorganically by merging/acquiring
Definition of vertical integration
Vertical integration is when a firm integrates with another firm at a different stage of the same production process.
Definition of backwards vertical integration
When a firm integrates with another firm that is further away from consumers in the same production process
Definition of forward vertical integration
When a firm integrates with another firm that is closer to the consumers in the same production process
Definition of horizontal integration
Firms at the same stage of the production process join together
Definition of conglomerate integration
When a firm merges with another firm in a different industry
PROS of vertical integration
-Control of the supply chain - Can prevent other firms from entering the market, leading to huge profits. Prevents competition
-Removes intermediary costs - No middleman reduces extra costs
-Better access —> Increases quality and efficiency —> Increased profits
CONS of vertical integration
-Regulation can ban vertical integration as controlling the supply chain can prevent competition —> exploits consumers by charging high prices
-Cost from diseconomies of scale and acquisition —> increases costs which reduces profits
-Firms may lack expertise of other markets —> Increases costs which reduces profits
PROS and CONS of horizontal integration
Firstly, horizontal mergers can lead to economies of scale which reduce a firm’s LRAC, increasing their profit.
However, firms can also suffer from diseconomies of scale. Integrating with a new firm can lead to alienation; bureaucracy from the legal work involved in two firms integrating; and poor communication. These all increase a firm’s LRAC, decreasing their profit.
Secondly, horizontal integration can lead to rationalisation, when firms reorganise to avoid duplicated costs (e.g. only one accounting team will now be needed, not two).
However, rationalisation can lead to job losses because duplicated departments will be fired.
Thirdly, horizontal integration reduces wasteful competition because the two firms are now working together.
However, horizontal integration can lead to brand dilution if the firms’ brands are very different.
Dairy Crest Group is a British food producer which uses a large amount of milk in its production processes to make dairy products. In March 2013, Dairy Crest Group bought Proper Welsh Milk, a firm which specialises in selling fresh milk. This takeover could lead to advantages of:
A) horizontal integration
B) backward vertical integration
C) forward vertical integration
D) conglomerate integration
E) external economies of scale
B
PROS and CONS of conglomerate integration
Firstly, conglomerate integration can lead to risk-bearing economies. Integrating with an unrelated firm helps a firm diversify, reducing the cost of failure in one sector…because the firm will still make a profit in others.
However, firms can also suffer from diseconomies of scale. Integrating with a new firm you don’t even know can lead to alienation; bureaucracy from the legal work involved in two firms integrating; and poor communication, especially because the two firms are completely unrelated and will likely have very different attitudes. These internal diseconomies of scale all increase a firm’s LRAC, decreasing their profit.
Secondly, conglomerate integration can increase brand awareness. Consumers of one firm will become aware of the other, increasing both firms’ sales.
However, conglomerate integration can also lead to brand dilution, if one firm’s brand image negatively affects another. Like Pepsi diluting Quaker Oats’ healthy porridge image.
Thirdly, conglomerate integration can lead to knowledge transfers between firms which increases dynamic efficiency. Like the awesome tech Apple and Beats have innovated after conglomerately integrating.
However, conglomerate integration can fail if firms lack expertise. If Nando’s acquired Ferrari, Nando’s wouldn’t know how to run Ferrari so the business would fail.