Theme 3: War and Revolution Flashcards
What are the 3 key changes to examine?
- Political
-Structure
-Reform
-Ideology - Economic
-Reform
-Impact - Social
-Opposition
-Reform
-Repression
THE CRIMEAN WAR- When was it?
Began in 1853- 1856
-Alexander II
Who was the Crimean war between?
Russia and the Turkish, supported by Britain and France
How did the war end?
Treaty of Paris 1856
How significant was the POLITICAL impact?
-Not significant
-Didn’t change the Tsar’s ideology i.e. remained an autocrat BUT he did acknowledge the need to reform from above (rather than below) (ideology)
-Did lead to changes in local government e.g. creation of Zemstva but this was limited due to redemption payments (structure)
How significant was the ECONOMIC impact?
-Significant
-In 1854 the war cost roughly 45% of the government’s expenditure (impact)
-More money was printed by the government to combat high expenditure= high debts (impact)
-Highlighted the economic backwardness of Russia + need to industrialise (impact + lack of reform)
How significant was the SOCIAL impact?
-Significant
-Emancipation Edict 1861= peasants legally freed BUT impact reduced by redemption payments (impact)
-Education, military and judicial reforms introduced (repression)
-Led to established opposition groups e.g. Populist movement= ‘people’s will’ (opposition)
-Question the Tsars intentions e.g. did he want to improve peasants lives or control the ‘dark masses’? (opposition)
RUSSO-TURKISH WAR- When was it?
1877-1888
-Alexander II
RUSSO-TURKISH WAR- When was it?
How significant was the SOCIAL impact?1877-1888
-Alexander II
How significant was the POLITICAL impact?
-Not significant at all
-No change to the structure of government
-No change to Tsars ideology
How significant was the ECONOMIC impact?
-Significant
-Caused a financial crisis at an already tenuous time for the Russian economy e.g. the rouble collapsed (impact)
-Highlighted Russia’s failure to industrialise (lack of reform)
How significant was the SOCIAL impact?
-Treaty of San Stefano= significant positively because it strengthened the Tsars image e.g. territorial and money gains - significant initial sense of pride (impact)
-Treaty of Berlin= significant negatively because it meant Russia lost territorial gains- led to discontent in Russia BUT still minor discontent in comparison to other wars (opposition)
RUSSO-JAPONESE WAR- When was it?
1904-1905
-Nicholas II
How significant was the POLITICAL impact?
-Extremely significant
-Contributed to the October Revolution which in turn resulted in the formation of a Duma- elected representative body - step towards democracy (structure)
-Slight shift in Tsar’s ideology as he recognised change was needed but again desired to preserve autocracy= 1906 Fundamental Laws
-Image of the Tsar’s authority was shattered- humiliating defeat to a ‘racially inferior country’ (ideology)
How significant was the ECONOMIC impact?
-Significant
- Led to food shortages, high inflation and was exacerbated by bad harvests in 1905 (impact)
-Highlighted that Russia’s economy still in need of industrialisation (impact)
How significant was the SOCIAL impact?
-Significant
-High press coverage of the failure increased discontent in Russia (impact)
-Prestige of the Tsar was destroyed
-Increased opposition- Social Revolutionary groups and middle-class Zemstvo liberals, as well as urban revolutionaries
-Contributed to a series of reforms introduced by Stolypin, known as the ‘necktie era’ (repression)
1905 REVOLUTION- When was it?
-October 1905
-Nicholas II
What was the result of Bloody Sunday?
-Peaceful protests for minimum wages and improved living standards were disrupted by troops who fired upon the protestors
-Strikes broke out across St Petersburg- nearly 400,000 went on strike
-Broke peoples trust of the Tsar
What was the result of the Potemkin Mutiny?
-Poor conditions in the Navy caused sailors to mutiny
-After heavy looting and violence the Tsar ordered troops to fire upon the sailors
=Embarrassment for the Tsar’s authority + concern for security (needed army’s support to remain Tsar)