Khrushchev- depth study Flashcards
Q1. How far did de-stalinisation represent a genuine break from the past?
When did Khrushchev come to power?
1956-1964
Why did Khrushchev adopt a policy of de-stalinisation?
- Believed that the previous government, under Stalin’s extreme repressive rule, had tarnished the USSR’s reputation and image overseas- wanted to change that
- Thought the people of Russia would welcome a new form of government
- Khrushchev may have wanted to detract from the unpopularity of his own policies
What was the impact of khrushchev’s secret speech?
-February 1956
-Launched an attack against Stalin’s repressive rule, showing him as satanic
-Initiated the policy of de-stalinisation
What were the features of de-stalinisation?
-8 million political prisoners released from Gulags
- Erosion of the cult of personality enshrined under Stalin e.g. Stalin’s body removed from the Stalin Mausoleum, all images and pictures of Stalin removed, Stalingrad renamed Volgograd
-Relax in censorship e.g. books published, tourists allowed to travel
-Freedom of employment
What were the aims of Khrushchev?
- Introduce a policy of ‘reform communism’ i.e. aimed to improve living standards through policies which included industrial and agricultural reform as well as give the people of Russia greater freedoms
- Ensure movement away from the cult of personality
What two major changes did Khrushchev plan for the Soviet system of government?
- Democratisation of the Communist party- increase democracy
-Tuition fees abolished
-Pensions were increased
-Party membership consisted of more workers and peasants - Decentralisation of control
-Creation of the Svnarkhozy= regional economic councils
-Transfer power from soviet central government to svnarkhozy
What two major changes did Khrushchev plan for the Soviet system of government?
- Democratisation of the Communist party- increase democracy
-Tuition fees abolished
-Pensions were increased
-Party membership consisted of more workers and peasants - Decentralisation of control
-Creation of the Svnarkhozy= regional economic councils
-Transfer power from soviet central government to svnarkhozy
What evidence suggests that de-stalinisation was a genuine break from the past?
-Talks of ‘peaceful co-existence’ with the USA was a positive change
-‘The Thaw’ i.e. allowance of greater personal freedom, particularly in comparison to Stalin’s previous repressive rule
-Decreasing the gap between the rich and the poor improved the position of the majority in society
-Less repression used e.g. in the face of a coup Khrushchev re-assigned the members of the Anti-Party group to unimportant positions, rather than executing/torturing them
-The fact that Khrushchev was removed by a single vote in itself shows a break from the bloodshed in the past
What evidence suggests that de-stalinisation was not a genuine break from the past?
-Some historians argue that Khrushchev replaced the Cult of Stalin’s Personality with his own cult of personality- total power remained in Khrushchev’s hands
-There was never any discussion of a total democracy taking place- a genuine break= total democracy
-Khrushchev’s handling of the Hungarian uprising- going against ‘liberal’ policies as well as the Novocherkassk riots
-No religious tolerance allowed e.g. Orthodox churches were abolished
JUDGEMENT: Did de-stalinisation represent a genuine break from the past?
-No
-Still elements of repression and no discussion of a total democracy
HOWEVER
-Still significant changes made to people’s personal freedoms, as well attempting to restructure the soviet central government to decrease the gap between the rich and the poor- break from the past is still clear
Q2. How effectively did Khrushchev deal with the challenges posed by the cold war?
What are the two debates about Khrushchev’s handling of the cold war?
He was a ‘courageous failure’ or a ‘courageous success’
-Courageous= policies of de-stalinisation and peaceful co-existence
What evidence shows that he was a ‘courageous success’?
-Supported the signing of the Austrian State Treaty in 1955- indicates that Khrushchev was willing to co-operate with the USA over Austria’s independence
-Gained support from Tito, Yugoslavia’s leader, for handling of the Hungarian uprising
-Gained backing of other socialist states e.g. Poland and Romania
-Berlin Wall prevented the West taking control over Germany
-Handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis tested Kennedy’s diplomatic skills and resulted in a direct ‘hotline’ which strengthened ‘peaceful coexistence’
What evidence shows that he was a ‘courageous failure’?
-Invasion of Hungary did not follow ‘coexistence’ liberal ideals as repression was used (like Stalin would have)- preventing the spread of communism
- Similar idea as the the Berlin Wall i.e. separated many families
-Khrushchev was unable to deal with conflict from Tito, which he tried to do through appeasement. Allowing Tito autonomy led to other states demanding autonomy, which created instability for the Soviet Bloc
-Cuban Missile Crisis led to criticism for Khrushchev who was seen as weak for backing down to the USA
-Unable to maintain positive relations with China, as they claimed they were the real upholders of Lenin-Marxism