Theme 2 PT 3.1 MISTAKE Flashcards
MISTAKE IN A CONTRACTUAL SENSE:
1) Where a contracting party acts while under an incorrect impression regarding some or other fact that relates to or affects the contract between the parties
CONSENSUS Components
1) TERMS
2) PARTIES
3) ANIMUS CONTRAHENDI
MISTAKE:
1) Parties APPEARED to have reached an agreement.
HOWEVER:
2) One/ both have DIFFERENT subjective intention.
Types of Mistakes
1) Casual
2) Non-Casual
CASUAL:
1) Affects the mistaken party’s decision to
contract.
2) The party would either:
2.1) Have not contracted at all; OR
2.2) Would have contracted on different terms.
3) Relevant.
NON-CASUAL
1) The party would have still contracted regardless of the mistake .
2) Irrelevant.
MATERIAL (ESSENTIAL)
MISTAKE
1) Goes to the heart of the
contract
2) Completely negates
consensus.
3) No contract can be said to
have existed.
NON-MATERIAL MISTAKE
1) Does not exclude actual
agreement.
2) A valid contract comes into
existence.
3) The contract is voidable
(rescindable) if consensus
was reached in an improper
manner by way of misrepresentation, duress, undue influence or
commercial bribery
UNILATERAL MISTAKE
1) Where only ONE PARTY makes a casual mistake.
2) Dissensus (lack
of consensus):
3) Void
MUTUAL
MISTAKE
1) BOTH PARTIES make casual mistakes, but they make different mistakes.
2) Dissensus (lack
of consensus):
3) Void
COMMON
MISTAKE
1) BOTH PARTIES make the same casual mistake.
2) Consensus based on
common false supposition
(still void)
MATERIAL MISTAKE:
Parties must:
1) SERIOUSLY INTENT to contract;
2) Be of the SAME MIND AS TO THE MATERIAL ASPECTS
3) Be AWARE that all parties are of the same mind.
4) If one or more of the above is lacking= material mistake.
MISTAKE REGARDING THE PARTIES TO
THE CONTRACT
Case Example:
National and Overseas Distributors
Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Potato Board.
MISTAKE REGARDING MATERIAL
TERMS
Case Example:
Allen v Sixteen Investments Stirling
Investments (Pty) Ltd.
Du Toit v Atkinson’s Motors Bpk
1) Where a party is mistaken as to the contents of the obligations that the parties wish to create, any mistake arising there from is material.
CLASSIFICATIONS
1) Error in corpore
2) Error in negotio
3) error in persona
4) error in substantia/qualitate
5) error in motive
Error In Corpore
1) Mistakes can relate to the SUBJECT
MATTER of the contract.
2) MATERIAL MISTAKE
Error In Negotio
1) Mistake relates to the TERMS OR
TRUE NATURE of the contract
2) See Khan v Naidoo.
3) MATERIAL MISTAKE
Error In Persona
Mistake regarding the IDENTITY of
one of the parties to the contract
SOMETIMES MATERIAL.
Error in Substantia/
Qualitate
1) Mistake re an ATTRIBUTE OR
CHARECTERISTIC of the SUBJECT MATTER of the contract.
2) It does not render the
contract void.
3) USUALLY NOT REGARDED AS A MATERIAL
MISTAKE
Error In Motive
Mistake as to the party’s REASONS
for entering into the contract.
NON- MATERIAL