Theme 2 PT 3 Continued Flashcards
Error in substantia/qualitate
1) Mistake re an ATTRIBUTE OR
CHARECTERISTIC of the
SUBJECT MATTER of the
contract- i.e. it does not render the
contract void.
2) USUALLY NOT REGARDED AS A
MATERIAL MISTAKE
Error In Motive
1) Mistake as to the party’s REASONS
for entering into the contract.
2) NON-MATERIAL
NON-MATERIAL MISTAKE:
1) Does not affect consensus.
2) If parties are in agreement regarding material terms – contract comes into being.
Khan v Naidoo
1) The mistake must, therefore, be one which touches the agreement in a material or fundamental respect, for example, in relation to its subject-matter… For negation
of consensus
Allen v Sixteen Stirling Investment (Pty) Ltd
1) The court found that the plaintiff’s mistake was justus. [A
fair or reasonable mistake].
2) Material: [Error in corpore: Subject matter.]
Shepherd v Farell’s Estate Agency:
He mistakenly thought that the contract was substantially in terms of the advertisement and this mistake was
caused by the advertisement itself and the agency’s failure to draw attention to the conflict between the advertisement and the contract
Sonap Petroleum (SA) (Pty) Ltd (formerly known as Sonarep (SA) (Pty) Ltd) v Pappadogianis:
1) Justus error:
2) Material and Reasonable.
3) Allen v Sixteen Stirling Investments.
4) Material: Subject matter.
5) Reasonable
Kok v Obsorne:
1) The seller accepted an offer ostensibly made by two buyers jointly.
2) However, the offer was actually from only one buyer.
3) It was clear that the defendant in that instance would not have accepted the offer had he known the true position [error in persona].
Venter and Others v Credit Guarantee Insurance Corporation of Africa Ltd:
Error in persona is material only if the identity of a party is of vital importance to the mistaken party.
RECTIFICATION
1) Remedy for correcting mistakes in written
contracts.
2) Sometimes when committing negotiated terms to a written format—a failure to correctly indicate the common intention of the parties occurs.
3) Generally parties can correct themselves (by agreement) or simply perform as per the correct intention
RECTIFICATION
1) Rectification does not create a new contract, nor does it amend an existing contract; it merely serves to correct the written memorial of the agreement so as
to accurately express the true intention of the parties.
2) Boundary Financing Ltd v Protea Property
Holdings
WHEN CAN YOU APPLY (UNDER WHAT
CIRCUMSTANCES)?
1) Document does not reflect true intentions of parties—bona fide mistake.
WHO MAY APPLY?
1) A party to an incorrectly recorded agreement.
2) Ask for the document to be corrected to conform with the true intention of the parties.