theft crimes Flashcards
steps for theft crimes
- How the defendant obtained the property (trespass, delivery, or trick).
- Whether the defendant acquired custody, possession, or title to the property.
- Whether the defendant had the intent to permanently deprive (steal) the property at some time while still in unlawful possession of the property.
larceny
unlawful taking of property in someone else’s possession with intent to steal.
embezzlement
fradulent conversion OR misappropriation of property in your possession.
fradulent conversion; seriously interfere with rights of owner
Can infer intent to permanently deprive an example of serious interference
False Pretenses
obtaining title to property owned by someone else through fraud.
Larceny by Trick
obtaining possession, but not title, through fraud, with intent to steal.
title
legal ownership, and implies possession.
possession
full dominion and control over the property, but does not require title.
custody
physical control of property in someone else’s possession without full dominion over the property – possessor places strict limits on permissible use of the property.
ex: dressing room
extortion
Obtaining property of another by threat of future harm to the victim or their property
if present harm, probably robbery, not extortion
Receiving Stolen Property
a) Receipt of stolen property, known to be stolen, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner
b) This is a common law misdemeanor
Forgery
a) Fraudulently making a false writing with apparent legal significance with the intent to make wrongful
use of the document
b) Alteration must be material (e.g., change the meaning or effect of the document) to qualify (i.e., signing a
false signature on a will)
recovering of own property likely cannot be
larceny because you lack the requisite intent
receiving stolen property
The defendant Knowingly or should have known (constructive knowledge) received stolen property with the intent to permanently deprive owner of property.
Would a reasonable person think stolen or did the defendant behave in such a way that shows that d knew stolen.
receiving stolen property
constructive facts
- selling it for higher amount
- what the seller says = i.e. i should not have this
- lack of due diligence
- low price, lack of info