murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

felony murder crimes

A
BARRK: 
b-burglary (except b with intent to injure/kill)  
a- arsron 
r- rape (except statutory rape) 
r- robbery 
k- kidnapping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deadly Weapons Doctrine

A

intent to kill is inferred from the defendant’s use of an instrument that is designed to kill or that is used in a manner likely to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

malice is established by

A

Intent to Kill or intent to inflict serious bodily injury, or deadly weapons doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

depraved-heart murder

A

unintentional killing:
o Reckless or grossly negligent conduct;
o That creates an extreme risk to others; and
o Demonstrates a wanton indifference to human life and a conscious disregard of an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Unintended killing resulting from extreme risk creation that manifests a wanton disregard for human life (e.g., Russian roulette)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

effect of felony murder

A

Malice is automatically established by causing death during the commission of the “right type” of felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

felony murder rule statement

A

o An intentional or accidental killing;
o Proximately caused;
o During the commission or attempted commission;
o Of a serious or inherently dangerous felony (BARRK).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Right type of felony”

A

(1) felonies listed in a statute, or (2) felonies that are independent of the killing and inherently dangerous.

cannot be collateral like felony assault or battery where the intent is to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

abstract jurisdiction (majority)

A

is the felony, in the abstract, inherently dangerous? ex; practicing without a medical license is not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

context jurisdiction (minority)

A

was it inherently dangerous in the context?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Right connection to felony”

A

The death must be a foreseeable outgrowth of the felony.

Liberally applied – only coincidences are ruled out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Right time”

A

the death must be the result of injuries inflicted during the commission, attempt, or immediate flight from a felony.
 Felony starts when the defendant could be convicted of attempt.
 Terminates when the defendant reaches temporary safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

co-felon murder exceptions

A

1- does not know co-felons are armed and the co-felon himself is not harmed
2- police or victim kills
3- deserving victim; a co-felon is exempt from felony murder responsibility when anyone kills another co-felon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

degrees in murder

A

both need malice; there is some other ingredient that differentiates the degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

premeditation timing

A

can be brief; but sometime to contemplate and reflect to conflict murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

deliberation

A

quality of rational thought; diminished capacity or voluntary intoxication can limit the degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Second-degree murder

A

is any killing with malice, but without the additional element to prove first-degree murder. In a jurisdiction that defines first-degree murder only as murder with premeditation and deliberation, any murder committed without the purpose to kill must be second-degree murder

17
Q

voluntary manslaughter

A

intentional murder mitigated by adequate provocation

18
Q

voluntary manslaughter

mitigating circumstances

A

1- diminished mental capacity (minority) not as much as insanity
2- imperfect self-defense use of force was unreasonable

19
Q

involuntary manslaughter

A

unintentional killing- recklessness or criminal negligence

20
Q

misdemeanor manslaughter

A

died as a result of inherently dangerous misdemenor like battery or non-BARRK felony

21
Q

two issues when analyzing murder

A

actus reus + mens rea

22
Q

heat of passion trigger

A

the defendant must be adequately

provoked

23
Q

adequate provocation

A

a provocation that would lead a reasonable

or ordinary person to lose self-control and fly into a sudden homicidal rage

24
Q

first-degree elevation

A

Proof that the defendant’s decision to kill was done with
both premeditation and deliberation elevates second-degree murder to first-degree murder

The defendant must consciously decide to kill, so the only malice sufficient is intent to kill

25
Q

example of the misdemeanor-murder rule

A

, a defendant can be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter where he unintentionally caused a death during the commission of a misdemeanor or a felony that is not inherently dangerous. Here, the man pushed the roommate, which was a battery, but had no intent to kill the roommate, whose fragile brain condition was a factor in his death.

fact pattern: so when a simple punch or push, even if planned, ends up in death the resulting charge will likely be involuntary manslaughter

26
Q

imperfect self-defense

A

when the defendant’s use of self-defense is unjustified, but in an honest mistake. mitigates higher degrees of murder to voluntary manslaughter

27
Q

self-defense rule

A

must be a good faith, reasonable mistake as to the necessity of using deadly force in self-defense justifies a resulting homicide

28
Q

volitional/actus reus defense does not matter in

A

involuntary manslaughter because the act itself is unintentional

29
Q

best defense for involuntary manslaughter

A

was not criminally negligent, reckless, or unrelated to a misdemeanor

30
Q

difference btween solicitation and conspiracy

A

solitication is one person acting omn behalf of another whereas conspiracy is an agreement to work together

31
Q

solicitation with more than two people

A

if the person who was working for you pawned the job off to someone else you are still liable if your intended result occurs