Theft and Property Offenses Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is larceny?

A

Larceny is the taking and asportation of property from possession of another without consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two requirements of larceny?

A

Asportation and taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is required by asportation?

A

Asportation requires that the property be severed from the possession or custody of the owner and in possession of the thief. Even the slightest change in position can satisy asportation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the thief’s possession need to look like?

A

The thief’s possession need only be momentary and the thief does not have to remove the property from the place or premise where it was kept. They only need to detach it from the shelves or other location and move it slightly with the intent to deprive the owner permanently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What intent does larceny require?

A

Larceny requires the specific intent to permanently deprice the owner of its propery. The thief does not have to intend to use or keep the property. If the thief has the requisite mental state, then the theft is completed once they have captured and asportated the propery. At that point, it does not matter that the property is subsequently returned or the thief changes their mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What if a person takes something temporarily?

A

If a person takes property with the intent to temporarily use or conceal it, but intends to return it when they take it, that is not a theft because it lacks the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What if the return of the property has a condition?

A

If the return of the property has a condition (e.g. money) then it is still a theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the common law definition of larceny?

A
  1. A trespassory taking and
  2. Carrying away of
  3. Personal property
  4. Of another person
  5. With the intent to permanently deprive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What other property offenses build off of larceny? (3)

A
  1. Larceny by trick
  2. Embezzlement
  3. False pretenses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does title pass with larceny?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the act in larceny by trick?

A

Taking and asportation of property from possession of another with consent obtained by fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the intent in larceny by trick?

A

Intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does title pass with larceny by trick?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the act in embezzlement?

A

Conversion of property held via a trust agreement to one’s own personal use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the intent for embezzlement?

A

Intent to defraud the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does title pass with embezzlement?

A

No

17
Q

What is the act in false pretenses?

A

Obtaining title to property by consent induced by fraudulent misrepresentation

18
Q

Does title pass in false pretenses?

A

Yes

19
Q

What is the modern approach to larceny?

A

The modern approach includes larceny and all the other property offenses in one statute with punishment varying in degrees based on the value of the property. Value is an attendant circumstance. The state must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the value of the property.

20
Q

What is the single larceny doctrine?

A

The single larceny doctrine looks to the circumstances of the offene to determine whether one larceny or multiple offenses have been committed. Generally, items taken from the same room constitutes a single larceny.

21
Q

What are the circumstances to consider when determining if there has been one or multiple larcenies? (5)

A
  1. The location of the items stolen
  2. The lapse of time between their taking
  3. The general and specific intent of the thief
  4. The number of owners
  5. Were there any intervening events between the takings
22
Q

What is the continuing trespass doctrine?

A

The continuing trespass doctrine is the idea that when someone unlawfully takes something from someone, they are trespassing on that property, and it is a continuing trespass while the thief has it. If the intent changes to permanently deprive, the state can now prove all of the elements of larceny.

23
Q

What if an item is stolen from a thief?

A

If an item is stolen from a thief, it is still larceny. Central to the issue is possession. Someone can own something without having clear title to it.

24
Q

What happens when someone recevies stolen property?

A

When unkowingly receiving stolen property, the defendant lacks the intent required to commit larceny of the original item. Knowingly receiving it has the intent and is larceny.

25
Q

What is robbery?

A

A robbery is a theft accomplished by force or threats of immediate death or physical injury

26
Q

What is an armed robbery?

A

An armed robbery requires that the defendant be armed with a dangerous weapon

27
Q

What constitutes a dangerous weapon?

A

Dangerous weapon includes items that are by their nature capable of causing serious bodily injury or death. Dangerous weapon also includes items that are used or displayed in a way suchthat they reasonably appear capable of causing serious bodily injury.

28
Q

Is a defendant stating he has a weapon enough for armed robbery?

A

No. A mere statement that a person has a weapon is not sufficient to establish that the robbery was accomplished with a deadly weapon.

29
Q

What is the difference between common law robbery and armed robbery?

A

The use of a dangerous weapon

30
Q

What is the difference between common law robbery and larceny?

A

Common law robbery has the additional requirement that the victim be put in fear by the perpetrator

31
Q

What determines whether something is a theft or robbery?

A

Whether a taking is a theft or robbery is contingent upon whether and when violence or fear is imposed. To make that determination, courts focus on the temporal proximity of the use of violence or fear to the taking and not the location of the use of violence or fear.

32
Q

What is the continuous offense theory?

A

A minority of jurisdictions use the continuous offense theory where robbery is defined to extend to situations in which force is used after the taking, such as to retain property or facilitate escape.

33
Q

What is the common law defintion of burglary?

A
  1. The breaking and entering of
  2. A dwelling of another
  3. In the nighttime
  4. With intent to commit a felony
34
Q

What is the modern trend for burglary?

A

The modern trend has removed the nighttime element and has expanded to more buildings than just dwellings. But burglary of a dwelling has a more serious punishment.

35
Q

When is entry satisfied during a burglary?

A

Entry is accomplished by the intrusion into the building of any party of the body, an arm, a hand, a finger, or a foot, or an instrument inserted and utilized as a means of effectuating or attempting to effectuate a theft. Entry includes merely moving to a material degree a closed window or door.

36
Q

Does a burglary require completion of the intended felony?

A

No. The burglary is committed as soon as the defendant enters with the intent to commit the felony. Commission of the felony is not required.

37
Q

Is it a burglary if someone does not intend to commit the felony?

A

No. If someone enters a home without intent to commit a felony but then happens to commit one once inside, it is not a burglary because there was not a concurrence of the elements.