Theft Flashcards

1
Q

What section defines theft under the Theft Act 1968?

A

Section 1 – “A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the Actus Reus (AR) and Mens Rea (MR) of theft?

A

AR = Appropriation of property belonging to another
• MR = Dishonesty + Intention to permanently deprive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does ‘appropriation’ mean under Section 3 of the Theft Act 1968?

A

Any assumption of the rights of an owner – even if the property was acquired innocently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case shows that switching price labels is appropriation?

A

Morris (1983) – D assumed one of the owner’s rights by switching labels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does appropriation require lack of consent from the owner?

A

No – Lawrence (1971) showed appropriation can still occur with the owner’s apparent consent if there is dishonesty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Hinks (2000) tell us about valid gifts and theft?

A

Even a valid gift can be appropriation if it’s accompanied by dishonesty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can appropriation happen at a single point in time?

A

Yes – Atakpu and Abrahams (1994) confirmed appropriation is not a continuing act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ‘property’ under Section 4 of the Theft Act 1968?

A

Money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and intangible things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case showed body parts can be property under the Theft Act?

A

Kelly and Lindsay (1998) – body parts used for teaching/preservation were considered property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When can land be stolen under Section 4(2)?

A
  1. By a trustee/personal rep in breach of duty
    1. When someone severs something from land
    2. When a tenant removes fixtures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a “thing in action”?

A

What is a “thing in action”?
A: A right enforceable by law, e.g., a bank account – Darrow (2018) and Kohn (1979)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Oxford v Moss (1979) show?

A

Information is not property – D not guilty for reading an exam paper he returned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a proprietary interest?

A

When someone still retains a legal interest in property even if they gave it to someone else – Webster (2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Davidge v Bunnett (1984) show?

A

Using money for a different purpose than intended can be theft if there’s an obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can electricity be stolen?

A

No – but it is an offence under Section 11 to dishonestly use electricity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What natural things cannot be stolen under Section 4(3)-(4)?

A

Wild plants, fungi, and flowers unless picked for sale or reward; wild creatures unless tamed or kept in captivity.

17
Q

What does Section 5 of the Theft Act 1968 define?

A

Belonging to another’ — property belongs to any person with possession or control of it, or with a proprietary interest in it.

18
Q

Can you steal your own property under the Theft Act?

A

Yes – if someone else has a legal right to it.
Case: Turner (No. 2) (1971) – D took his own car from a garage without paying.

19
Q

What did Ricketts v Basildon Magistrates’ Court (2010) establish?

A

Property left outside a charity shop was not abandoned – it belonged to the charity once delivery was attempted.

20
Q

What is a ‘proprietary interest’?

A

A person can retain rights in property even if someone else has possession or control of it.
Case: Webster (2006) – MoD retained interest in a mistakenly sent second medal.

21
Q

What does Section 5(3) and 5(4) cover?

A

s5(3): Property received under obligation (e.g., to spend in a certain way)
• s5(4): Property received by mistake (must be returned)

22
Q

What happened in Davidge v Bunnett (1984)?

A

D was guilty of theft for using flatmates’ money meant for bills on personal gifts.

23
Q

What case supports theft by failure to return money received by mistake?

A

Attorney-General’s Reference (No. 1 of 1983) (1985) – overpaid wages not returned = theft.

24
Is motive relevant in deciding dishonesty under Section 2?
No – it’s irrelevant whether the appropriation benefits the thief or another.
25
What are the three statutory exceptions where D is NOT dishonest (Section 2(1))?
D believes he has a legal right 2. D believes the owner would consent 3. D believes the owner cannot be found (despite taking reasonable steps)
26
What did Holden (1991) show about dishonesty?
D was not dishonest if he had a genuine belief he had a right to the property (subjective test at the time).
27
What is the current test for dishonesty?
Ivey v Genting Casinos (2017) (confirmed in Barton and Booth): a. What did D believe the facts were? b. Was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary people?
28
What does Section 6 of the Theft Act require?
An intention to permanently deprive the other of the property.
29
What case supports intention to permanently deprive even when replacing items?
Velumyl (1989) – D took money and intended to return different notes = theft.
30
Does borrowing ever amount to theft?
Only if the item loses its ‘goodness, virtue and practical value’. Case: Lloyd (1985) – film borrowed and returned in time was not theft
31
Is conditional intent enough for theft?
No – D must intend to steal something specific. Case: Easom (1971) – D only intended to steal something of value, not theft.