Self-defence Flashcards

1
Q

What types of protection can self-defence be used for?

A

Protection of oneself, another person, or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What statute codifies self-defence?

A

Section 76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the legal test for self-defence?

A
  1. Subjective: Did D honestly believe force was necessary?
    1. Objective: Was the force used reasonable in the circumstances as D believed them to be?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Section 3(1) Criminal Law Act 1967 state?

A

A person may use such force as is reasonable in the prevention of crime or in effecting a lawful arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the rule on excessive force?

A

If excessive force is used, self-defence fails and D is guilty of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Section 76(3) CJIA 2008 cover?

A

It covers the subjective test – whether D believed force was necessary based on the circumstances as they appeared to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Section 76(4) CJIA 2008 state about mistaken belief?

A

If D genuinely believed in the need for force, they can rely on that belief—even if it was mistaken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case supports mistaken belief in self-defence?

A

Williams (1987) – D judged on his mistaken view of facts, regardless of whether the mistake was reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Section 76(7) CJIA 2008 say about reasonable force?

A

Force may be considered reasonable if it was instinctively and honestly done in the heat of the moment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case illustrates instinctive and honest action being potent evidence?

A

Palmer (1971) – Jury may accept that honest instinctive reaction is reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in Martin (2001)?

A

D was found guilty as the victim was fleeing and no longer a threat – excessive force used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why did self-defence fail in Hussain and another (2010)?

A

Because the attack was a revenge act after the threat had ended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule on retreat in self-defence?

A

There is no duty to retreat (Bird 1985), though showing unwillingness to fight may help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is pre-emptive self-defence allowed?

A

Yes, if there’s an imminent threat (R v Deana), but not if the threat is general or distant (Salih 2008).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens if D is the aggressor?

A

D may still use self-defence unless they were the aggressor throughout (Rashford 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the law say about householder cases?

A

Force must not be grossly disproportionate. It can be disproportionate under certain conditions (Crime and Courts Act 2013, s43).

17
Q

What case explores householder self-defence in detail?

A

Ray (2017) – force judged based on D’s belief, and jury considers factors like time of day, shock, and presence of others.

18
Q

Can a drunken mistake support self-defence?

A

No – O’Grady (1987) and s76(5) CJIA: intoxicated mistake cannot be relied on for self-defence.