Theft Flashcards
What is the act for theft + what does it say?
S.1 theft act 1968
“A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it”
What are the 5 sections for theft
S.2 dishonestly (MR)
S.3 appropriates (AR)
S.4 property (AR)
S.5 belonging to another (AR)
S.6 intention of permanently depriving the other (MR)
Actus reus of theft
S.3 appropriation
S.4 property
S.5 belonging to another
What is appropriation
Any assumption by a person of the rights of the owner
Cases for appropriation
R v Morris
Lawrence v MPC
R v Hicks
How is property defined
•money
•personal property
•real property eg land and building
•things in action eg bank account
•other intangible property rights with no physical presence eg copyright
Cases for property
Oxford v moss (knowledge of questions not property)
R v Marshall (unexpired tickets are property)
How is belonging to another defined
The owner is the person with possession and control of the property
Cases for belonging to another
R v Turner (No.2) (his car was under the control of the garage so theft)
R v Woodman (left metal scraps were capable of being stolen)
Property as a mistake case
AG Red (No.1) if the defendant doesn’t withdraw or return accidental money then there is theft
Mens rea theft
S.2 dishonesty
S.6 intention to permanently depriving
How is dishonesty defined
There cannot be a recklessness to steal so dishonesty must occur there are exceptions
When is there not dishonesty
S2(1)(a) genuine belief that there was a legal right to property
S2(1)(b) genuine belief the owner would have consented
S2(1)(c) the owner cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps
Test for dishonesty
Ivey v genting -> Barton and booth
Test the dishonesty against the reasonable and honest person of society
How is intention to permanently deprive defined
If they intend to treat the property as his own to dispose of regardless the owners rights and may occur if the D claims he only intended to borrow the goods for a period of time as it includes intention to borrow as long as may as well have been outright taking
Cases for intention to permanently deprive
R v Lavender
R v Lloyd (not intention as they returned the goods in the same condition)