Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 2 types of involuntarily manslaughter

A

Unlawful act manslaughter
Gross negligence manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is unlawful act manslaughter definined

A

Liability is built up from the lesser crime, for example, if the D intended to commit an armed robbery and killed someone while carrying out the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To prove unlawful act manslaughter what is needed to be proven

A
  1. A positive act
  2. An unlawful act
  3. Unlawful act should be dangerous
  4. The positive act can be done with the necessary mens rea
  5. Chain of causation be intact and death ensue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. A positive act UAM
A

Unlike murder the act cannot be an omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. unlawful act
    UAM
A

The unlawful act must be a crime and not a civil wrong
R v Ball
DPP v Newbury
R v lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Dangerous act (objective test)
    UAM
A

The reasonable person must recognise that the act of the D would cause the other person ‘some harm’
R v Church
R v JM and SM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What if it is an act against property?
UAM

A

Can be against property so long as church rule of reasonable sober person applies
R v Goodfellow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What if fear and apprehension UAM

A

Fear and apprehension will not be enough
R v Dawson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. The positive act be done with necessary mens rea
A

Must be shown there is the necessary MR
DPP v Newbury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Causing the death of the victim UAM
A

But be the factual causation, legal causation, more than minimal, can be broken by intervening act
R v cato
R v Kennedy
Kimsey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is gross negligence manslaughter

A

Breach of a duty of care leading to the death
Adomako
R v Broughton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elements needed for GNM

A
  1. Duty of care
  2. Breach of duty of care
  3. At the time of breach there was a serious and obvious risk of death
  4. It was reasonably foreseeable at the time of breach that it gave rise to serious and obvious risk of death
  5. The breach caused death (factual and legal)
  6. Ds actions so grossly negligent that they could be classed as a crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Duty of care GNM
A

The duty of care should be obvious
Singh
R v Wacker
R v Stone & Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Breach of duty GNM
A

Fails to meet applicable standard of care
Blythe v Birmingham
Bolam v Friern
Wacker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Serious and obvious risk of death GNM
A

More than a minimal or remote

17
Q
  1. It was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the breach of the duty that the breach gave rise to a serious and obvious risk of death GNM
A

Look at if obvious at the time of breach

18
Q
  1. Causing the death GNM
A

Factual and legal
R v Wacker

19
Q
  1. Breach must be gross GNM
A

For jury to decide and an objective test as to what is considered to be gross
R v Misra & Srivastava