Theft Flashcards
s.1 Theft Act 1968
“A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it”
Appropriation
S.3(1) Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner
R v Pitman and Hehl
Includes selling property not in D’s possession
R v Morris
There does not have to be an assumption of all the rights of the owner, the assumption of any of the rights will suffice ( here was swapping price labels)
Atakpu and abrahams
appropriation cannot be continuous - must exist in one specific moment in time
Eddy v niman
If D has intention to steal but doesnt actually approriate, not theft
V consents to appropriation
R v Lawrence: still be appropriation if V consents
R v Gomez: Consent received through deception is not real
R v Hinks: Includes receiving a gift
Property
s.4(1) says “property includes money and all other property, real and personal, including things in action and other intangible property”
Property
Real (land and buildings)
Personal (moveable items that can be stolen)
In action (debts/cheques Kohn)
Intangible (export quota AG for Hong kong v chan nai-keung)
Not property
Wild mushrooms, fungus, plants, shrubs,fruits,flowers (s.4(3))
Wild animals and carcasses (unless tamed s.4(4))
Land and interests in land (s.4(2))
Corpses and body parts (r v sharpe)
Unless body then for skill and art can be stolen (kelly and lindsay)
Bodily fluids can be (R v welsh)
Electricity (low v blease)
Information (oxford v moss)
Belonging to another
s.5(1) theft act ‘property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control if it, or having in it any proprietary right or interest’
R v Turner
You can steal your own property if you do not at the point of appropriation have the legal right to it or do not have possession or control of it
s.5(3)
Property received under an obligation to use it in a certain way will be seen as belonging to another unless it is used for that exact purpose (davidge v bunnett)
s.5(4)
Property received by the mistake of another still belongs to another (AG’s ref 1 of 1983)
R v Dyke & Munro
Money for charity belongs to the charity as soon as it is collected