Theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What elements (actus reus and mens rea) are required to be guilty of theft

A

ACTUS REUS
appropriation
of property
belonging to another

MENS REA
dishonesty
intention to permanently deprive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is theft defined - act, section, definition

A

Section 1 Theft Act - “A person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Appropriation - act, section, definition

A

Section 3 Theft Act - “Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is included in appropriation?

A

Taking something and keeping it
Selling
Destroying and damaging it
Modifying or changing it
Lending it to someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Appropriation case and also the case which states you don’t need to touch anything to appropriate it

A

McPherson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the case of A____ and A____ tell us about appropriation

A

Appropriation can be a continuing act but the jury decides when it stops
Atakpu and Abrahams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the case of R v M___ tell us about appropriation

A

Swapping labels in a store is appropriation
R v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the case of N___ tell us about appropriation

A

If there is no appropriation there is no theft – even if there is intention to steal
Niman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does s.3 Theft Act tell us about appropriation

A

Someone who purchases stolen items without knowledge is not guilty, even if they find out the items were stolen at a later date - R v Adams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the case of G____ tell us about appropriation

A

If the owner consents to the appropriation this will not be theft – UNLESS this consent is obtained by deception
Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the case of L__tell us about appropriation

A

Theft can be found even where the victim consented to the appropriation
Lawrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the case of H____ tell us about appropriation

A

There can be appropriation even if something is given as a gift – if there is deception
Hinks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is property defined in Section 4 Theft Act

A

“Includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is included in property

A
  • Money
  • Personal property - phone, bag etc.
  • Real property - Buildings
  • Things in action - money in a bank account
    Intangible property - things that cannot be seen but can class as property
    Bodily fluids - R v Welsh
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cases for things in action

A

R v Kohn - cheques
Darroux v X - overtime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Things that are not classed as property

A

Corpse - R v Sharpe
Confidential Information - Oxford v Moss
Electricity - Low v Blease

17
Q

Things that are not classed as property unless something happens to them

A

Wildflowers - Unless they are resold for profit - section 4(3) Theft Act

Wild animals - unless they are pets/possessions - Section 4(4) Theft Act

Body Parts - Unless skill is being applied to them - R v Kelly and Lindsay

18
Q

Belonging to another - section with definition

A

Section 5 Theft Act 1968
Property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having in it any proprietary right or interest

19
Q

Things that are included in ‘belonging to another’

A
  • Another person owning something
    • Another person having possession or control of something
    • Wide interpretation of ‘belonging to’ - includes stealing your own property in some situations (R v Turner) - car at garage
    • Obtaining another persons property by mistake and keeping it (s.5(4)) (AG’s Ref) - extra wages
      Being given another persons property for a specific reason and using it for something else (under an obligation - s.5(3) (Davidge v Bunnett) - gas bill, christmas presents
20
Q

Includes if someone else has a ‘proprietary interest’ over the property. Explain what this means and include a case.

A

S.5(2) states that property held in trust belongs to anyone who has the right to enforce the trust, and an intention to defeat the trust is an attempt to deprive the person of that property

R v Marshall
D resold partly used underground tickets

21
Q

Due to the case of Ivey v Genting, what does the jury have to ask when considering dishonesty?

A

What was the state of D’s knowledge or belief as to the facts?

Were their actions dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people?

22
Q

However, section 2 does state what will NOT be classed as dishonest:

A

D has the right to deprive the owner of the property (R v Dobinson 1977)

D would have consent of the owner in the circumstances (R v Holden 1991)

Person who the property belongs to cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps (R v Small 1988)

23
Q

Dishonesty is left to the jury to decide - case

A

R v Feely

24
Q

Intention to permanently deprive - section and definition

A

Includes “treating the thing as his own to dispose of regardless of the other’s rights”

Also includes borrowing and returning it in a less valuable way

25
Q

Two cases for ITPD

A

R v Lavender - council doors - moved from building to house - guilty

R v Lloyd - borrowed films from cinema, returned them in time and undamaged - not guilty

26
Q

What does the case of R v Easom tell us - ITPD

A

ITPD does not include condition intent (only would steal something valuable)

27
Q

What does the case of R v Raphael tell us - ITPD

A

ITPD does include using their property for ransom

28
Q

What does the case of R v Velumyl tell us - ITPD

A

ITPD includes intention to replace something with identical property.

29
Q

What does the case of R v Fernandes tell us - ITPD

A

ITPD includes intending to return property but cannot be sure of its return

30
Q

What does the case of R v Mitchell tell us about ITPD

A

ITPD does not include just abandoning property.