The Supreme Court and Civil Rights Flashcards

1
Q

Who was Bork and what was his mistake

A

(1987) A Supreme Court nominee who was rejected due to a partisan battle over his nomination. He was very vocal about his belief that Roe v Wade had little/no legal basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the SC ruling on USAID in 2025

A

The court rules (5-4) that Trump’s restricting of $2bn to projects of USAID which were already completed was an overextension of his powers. Those judges who dissented criticised the judicial activism of their colleagues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Trump v US 2024

A

Helf that presidents had immunity from criminal prosecution for acts conducted under their core constitutional authority as president.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What kind of cases to the courts avoid taking in order to avoid controversy

A

Healthcare - specifically drug pricing and universal healthcare.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was 3030 Creative LLC v Elenis (2023)

A

Case wherein a website creator did not want to public announcements for gay marriage - was a violation of anti-discrimination laws. However, the website won.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a pragmatist/constructuralist approach v an originalist approach to the constitution

A
  1. interpreting the constitution in line with changing societal circumstances.
  2. interpreting the constitution in line with the way it was written and the founding father’s intentions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Department of homeland security v Regents of the Uni of California (2020)

A

Trump’s attempt to rescind the DACA (deferred action for childhood arrivals) was “arbitrary and capricious” .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the measures to promote equality in the US

A

Affirmative action, voting rights and representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of how affirmative action is positive v how it has been limited

A

Sonia Sotomayor: “ignoring race will not equalise a society that is racially unequal”
The Rooney Rule - ensures that NFL candidates for head coaching positions must must have at least 2 ethnic minority.
Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard ruled that Harvard’s admissions process violated the 14th amendment of equal protection under the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Examples of Voting Rights improving racial equality

A

Civil rights act 1964, Voting rights act 1965 (large parts of which have been gutted by SC rulings such as Shelby v County holder).
NAACP - encouraging people to vote (they have been struggling under Trump)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an example of how it may be argued that justices are not politically independent.

A

2010, Obama’s state of the union address critiqued the Citizens united ruling.
2025, Trump called a federal judge’s ruling “a disgrace”, with Vance saying that judges don’t have legitimate authority to limit a president’s power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did justice Marshall say about his role as a judge.

A

“You do what you think is right and let the law catch up”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many states had legalised gay marriage when Obergefell won?

A

12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What Hawaii v Trump (2018)

A

The case which ruled that Trumps “travel ban” on 7 (predominantly Muslim) countries was not a violation of the constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Dobbs V Jackson

A

The 2022 SC case which overturned Roe v Wade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was Bostock v Clayton County (2020)

A

The SC case which ruled that workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or transexuality was incompatible with the civil rights act 1974.